Gemini 3.5 Flash

import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  model: 'google:gemini@3.5-flash',
  inputs: {
    audios: [
      'https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/a5174661-ac4a-4ffd-a1ac-0ea1b0a458b5.mp3'
    ]
  },
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'Analyze the attached wind-turbine technician recording and produce a concise service memo. Include the turbine identifier, reported issue, inspection findings, exact measurements and thresholds, work completed, post-service test result, required follow-up, deadline, and work-order reference. Use a short heading followed by no more than five bullets. Do not add facts that are not stated in the audio.'
    }
  ]
})

import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
            "inputs": {
                "audios": [
                    "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/a5174661-ac4a-4ffd-a1ac-0ea1b0a458b5.mp3"
                ]
            },
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "Analyze the attached wind-turbine technician recording and produce a concise service memo. Include the turbine identifier, reported issue, inspection findings, exact measurements and thresholds, work completed, post-service test result, required follow-up, deadline, and work-order reference. Use a short heading followed by no more than five bullets. Do not add facts that are not stated in the audio."
                }
            ]
        })


asyncio.run(main())

curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "c3828cb7-b662-4d36-b1e0-493017610af8",
      "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
      "inputs": {
        "audios": [
          "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/a5174661-ac4a-4ffd-a1ac-0ea1b0a458b5.mp3"
        ]
      },
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "Analyze the attached wind-turbine technician recording and produce a concise service memo. Include the turbine identifier, reported issue, inspection findings, exact measurements and thresholds, work completed, post-service test result, required follow-up, deadline, and work-order reference. Use a short heading followed by no more than five bullets. Do not add facts that are not stated in the audio."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]'

runware run google:gemini@3.5-flash \
  inputs.audios.0=https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/a5174661-ac4a-4ffd-a1ac-0ea1b0a458b5.mp3 \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="Analyze the attached wind-turbine technician recording and produce a concise service memo. Include the turbine identifier, reported issue, inspection findings, exact measurements and thresholds, work completed, post-service test result, required follow-up, deadline, and work-order reference. Use a short heading followed by no more than five bullets. Do not add facts that are not stated in the audio."

{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "c3828cb7-b662-4d36-b1e0-493017610af8",
  "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
  "inputs": {
    "audios": [
      "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/a5174661-ac4a-4ffd-a1ac-0ea1b0a458b5.mp3"
    ]
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "Analyze the attached wind-turbine technician recording and produce a concise service memo. Include the turbine identifier, reported issue, inspection findings, exact measurements and thresholds, work completed, post-service test result, required follow-up, deadline, and work-order reference. Use a short heading followed by no more than five bullets. Do not add facts that are not stated in the audio."
    }
  ]
}

import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  outputFormat: 'JSON',
  model: 'google:gemini@3.5-flash',
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'Analyze the following landlord term sheet for a neighborhood physical therapy clinic. Identify material financial, operational, legal, and schedule risks from the tenant\'s perspective. Distinguish explicit terms from ambiguities, cite the relevant language, and prioritize issues that should be negotiated before the letter of intent is signed. Do not provide legal advice or assume facts not stated.\n\nTERM SHEET\nPremises: Approximately 4,800 rentable square feet at Harbor Point Commons, Suite 210.\nTerm: Ten years beginning on the earlier of (a) the clinic opening to patients or (b) 120 days after landlord delivers the premises.\nBase rent: $42.00 per rentable square foot in year one, increasing 3.5% annually.\nAdditional rent: Tenant pays its proportionate share of taxes, insurance, common-area maintenance, security, landscaping, snow removal, management fees, and capital expenditures. Controllable CAM increases are capped at 5% annually; taxes, insurance, utilities, security, snow removal, and capital expenditures are excluded from the cap.\nDelivery: Landlord will deliver the premises broom-clean with existing building systems in their current condition. Tenant accepts the premises as-is.\nTenant improvements: Landlord provides an allowance of $55.00 per rentable square foot, reimbursed after the clinic opens, final lien waivers are supplied, and tenant is not in default. Tenant pays all costs above the allowance. No deadline for reimbursement is stated.\nPermits: Tenant is responsible for all zoning, accessibility, health, signage, and construction approvals. The term sheet contains no permit contingency or termination right.\nOpening requirement: Tenant must open within 120 days after delivery and continuously operate during the term. Failure to open on time triggers rent commencement and a charge of $750 per day.\nUse: Outpatient physical therapy and related rehabilitation services only.\nExclusivity: Landlord will not lease another space in the center to a physical therapy clinic, excluding current tenants, their successors, hospital-affiliated providers, fitness operators, chiropractors, and tenants occupying more than 10,000 square feet.\nAssignment: Any assignment, sublease, merger, sale of substantially all assets, or change in control requires landlord consent, which may be withheld in landlord\'s sole discretion. Landlord may recapture the premises.\nGuaranty: Full personal guaranty from both founders for the entire term and all extensions.\nRelocation: Landlord may relocate tenant once during the term to comparable premises in the center with 90 days\' notice. Tenant must remain open during the move. Landlord pays reasonable physical moving costs; the term sheet does not address permits, downtime, new improvements, patient communications, or business interruption.\nRepairs: Tenant maintains and replaces all systems serving the premises, including HVAC, plumbing, electrical equipment, doors, glass, and fire-safety components, regardless of age or cause of failure.\nCasualty: Landlord may terminate after material damage. If landlord elects to restore, rent abates only when the entire premises is unusable. No outside restoration deadline is stated.\nRenewal: One five-year option at then-current fair market rent, but never less than 110% of the final year\'s rent. Tenant must give notice 15 months before expiration.\nHoldover: 200% of the final month\'s base rent plus additional rent and consequential damages.\n\nReturn only JSON matching the supplied schema. The summary should be an executive overview suitable for the clinic\'s founders. The keyPoints list should contain the most consequential issues in descending priority, with practical tenant-side recommendations.'
    }
  ],
  jsonSchema: {
    type: 'object',
    properties: {
      summary: {
        type: 'string',
        description: 'A concise executive summary of the overall risk profile and immediate negotiation priorities.'
      },
      keyPoints: {
        type: 'array',
        description: 'Material issues ordered from highest to lowest priority.',
        items: {
          type: 'object',
          properties: {
            category: {
              type: 'string',
              enum: [
                'schedule',
                'financial',
                'operational',
                'assignment',
                'guaranty',
                'exclusivity',
                'repairs',
                'relocation',
                'casualty',
                'renewal',
                'other'
              ]
            },
            severity: {
              type: 'string',
              enum: [
                'critical',
                'high',
                'medium',
                'low'
              ]
            },
            issue: {
              type: 'string',
              description: 'A clear statement of the risk or ambiguity.'
            },
            evidence: {
              type: 'string',
              description: 'The relevant language or fact from the term sheet.'
            },
            impact: {
              type: 'string',
              description: 'The plausible business consequence for the tenant.'
            },
            recommendation: {
              type: 'string',
              description: 'A practical tenant-side negotiation request or next step.'
            }
          },
          required: [
            'category',
            'severity',
            'issue',
            'evidence',
            'impact',
            'recommendation'
          ],
          additionalProperties: false
        }
      }
    },
    required: [
      'summary',
      'keyPoints'
    ],
    additionalProperties: false,
    name: 'response',
    strict: true,
    schema: {
      type: 'object',
      properties: {
        summary: {
          type: 'string'
        },
        keyPoints: {
          type: 'array',
          items: {
            type: 'string'
          }
        }
      },
      required: [
        'summary',
        'keyPoints'
      ],
      additionalProperties: false
    }
  }
})

import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "outputFormat": "JSON",
            "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "Analyze the following landlord term sheet for a neighborhood physical therapy clinic. Identify material financial, operational, legal, and schedule risks from the tenant's perspective. Distinguish explicit terms from ambiguities, cite the relevant language, and prioritize issues that should be negotiated before the letter of intent is signed. Do not provide legal advice or assume facts not stated.\n\nTERM SHEET\nPremises: Approximately 4,800 rentable square feet at Harbor Point Commons, Suite 210.\nTerm: Ten years beginning on the earlier of (a) the clinic opening to patients or (b) 120 days after landlord delivers the premises.\nBase rent: $42.00 per rentable square foot in year one, increasing 3.5% annually.\nAdditional rent: Tenant pays its proportionate share of taxes, insurance, common-area maintenance, security, landscaping, snow removal, management fees, and capital expenditures. Controllable CAM increases are capped at 5% annually; taxes, insurance, utilities, security, snow removal, and capital expenditures are excluded from the cap.\nDelivery: Landlord will deliver the premises broom-clean with existing building systems in their current condition. Tenant accepts the premises as-is.\nTenant improvements: Landlord provides an allowance of $55.00 per rentable square foot, reimbursed after the clinic opens, final lien waivers are supplied, and tenant is not in default. Tenant pays all costs above the allowance. No deadline for reimbursement is stated.\nPermits: Tenant is responsible for all zoning, accessibility, health, signage, and construction approvals. The term sheet contains no permit contingency or termination right.\nOpening requirement: Tenant must open within 120 days after delivery and continuously operate during the term. Failure to open on time triggers rent commencement and a charge of $750 per day.\nUse: Outpatient physical therapy and related rehabilitation services only.\nExclusivity: Landlord will not lease another space in the center to a physical therapy clinic, excluding current tenants, their successors, hospital-affiliated providers, fitness operators, chiropractors, and tenants occupying more than 10,000 square feet.\nAssignment: Any assignment, sublease, merger, sale of substantially all assets, or change in control requires landlord consent, which may be withheld in landlord's sole discretion. Landlord may recapture the premises.\nGuaranty: Full personal guaranty from both founders for the entire term and all extensions.\nRelocation: Landlord may relocate tenant once during the term to comparable premises in the center with 90 days' notice. Tenant must remain open during the move. Landlord pays reasonable physical moving costs; the term sheet does not address permits, downtime, new improvements, patient communications, or business interruption.\nRepairs: Tenant maintains and replaces all systems serving the premises, including HVAC, plumbing, electrical equipment, doors, glass, and fire-safety components, regardless of age or cause of failure.\nCasualty: Landlord may terminate after material damage. If landlord elects to restore, rent abates only when the entire premises is unusable. No outside restoration deadline is stated.\nRenewal: One five-year option at then-current fair market rent, but never less than 110% of the final year's rent. Tenant must give notice 15 months before expiration.\nHoldover: 200% of the final month's base rent plus additional rent and consequential damages.\n\nReturn only JSON matching the supplied schema. The summary should be an executive overview suitable for the clinic's founders. The keyPoints list should contain the most consequential issues in descending priority, with practical tenant-side recommendations."
                }
            ],
            "jsonSchema": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "summary": {
                        "type": "string",
                        "description": "A concise executive summary of the overall risk profile and immediate negotiation priorities."
                    },
                    "keyPoints": {
                        "type": "array",
                        "description": "Material issues ordered from highest to lowest priority.",
                        "items": {
                            "type": "object",
                            "properties": {
                                "category": {
                                    "type": "string",
                                    "enum": [
                                        "schedule",
                                        "financial",
                                        "operational",
                                        "assignment",
                                        "guaranty",
                                        "exclusivity",
                                        "repairs",
                                        "relocation",
                                        "casualty",
                                        "renewal",
                                        "other"
                                    ]
                                },
                                "severity": {
                                    "type": "string",
                                    "enum": [
                                        "critical",
                                        "high",
                                        "medium",
                                        "low"
                                    ]
                                },
                                "issue": {
                                    "type": "string",
                                    "description": "A clear statement of the risk or ambiguity."
                                },
                                "evidence": {
                                    "type": "string",
                                    "description": "The relevant language or fact from the term sheet."
                                },
                                "impact": {
                                    "type": "string",
                                    "description": "The plausible business consequence for the tenant."
                                },
                                "recommendation": {
                                    "type": "string",
                                    "description": "A practical tenant-side negotiation request or next step."
                                }
                            },
                            "required": [
                                "category",
                                "severity",
                                "issue",
                                "evidence",
                                "impact",
                                "recommendation"
                            ],
                            "additionalProperties": False
                        }
                    }
                },
                "required": [
                    "summary",
                    "keyPoints"
                ],
                "additionalProperties": False,
                "name": "response",
                "strict": True,
                "schema": {
                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {
                        "summary": {
                            "type": "string"
                        },
                        "keyPoints": {
                            "type": "array",
                            "items": {
                                "type": "string"
                            }
                        }
                    },
                    "required": [
                        "summary",
                        "keyPoints"
                    ],
                    "additionalProperties": False
                }
            }
        })


asyncio.run(main())

curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "6a3d3618-3b31-40d1-b031-be59d8809686",
      "outputFormat": "JSON",
      "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "Analyze the following landlord term sheet for a neighborhood physical therapy clinic. Identify material financial, operational, legal, and schedule risks from the tenant's perspective. Distinguish explicit terms from ambiguities, cite the relevant language, and prioritize issues that should be negotiated before the letter of intent is signed. Do not provide legal advice or assume facts not stated.\n\nTERM SHEET\nPremises: Approximately 4,800 rentable square feet at Harbor Point Commons, Suite 210.\nTerm: Ten years beginning on the earlier of (a) the clinic opening to patients or (b) 120 days after landlord delivers the premises.\nBase rent: $42.00 per rentable square foot in year one, increasing 3.5% annually.\nAdditional rent: Tenant pays its proportionate share of taxes, insurance, common-area maintenance, security, landscaping, snow removal, management fees, and capital expenditures. Controllable CAM increases are capped at 5% annually; taxes, insurance, utilities, security, snow removal, and capital expenditures are excluded from the cap.\nDelivery: Landlord will deliver the premises broom-clean with existing building systems in their current condition. Tenant accepts the premises as-is.\nTenant improvements: Landlord provides an allowance of $55.00 per rentable square foot, reimbursed after the clinic opens, final lien waivers are supplied, and tenant is not in default. Tenant pays all costs above the allowance. No deadline for reimbursement is stated.\nPermits: Tenant is responsible for all zoning, accessibility, health, signage, and construction approvals. The term sheet contains no permit contingency or termination right.\nOpening requirement: Tenant must open within 120 days after delivery and continuously operate during the term. Failure to open on time triggers rent commencement and a charge of $750 per day.\nUse: Outpatient physical therapy and related rehabilitation services only.\nExclusivity: Landlord will not lease another space in the center to a physical therapy clinic, excluding current tenants, their successors, hospital-affiliated providers, fitness operators, chiropractors, and tenants occupying more than 10,000 square feet.\nAssignment: Any assignment, sublease, merger, sale of substantially all assets, or change in control requires landlord consent, which may be withheld in landlord's sole discretion. Landlord may recapture the premises.\nGuaranty: Full personal guaranty from both founders for the entire term and all extensions.\nRelocation: Landlord may relocate tenant once during the term to comparable premises in the center with 90 days' notice. Tenant must remain open during the move. Landlord pays reasonable physical moving costs; the term sheet does not address permits, downtime, new improvements, patient communications, or business interruption.\nRepairs: Tenant maintains and replaces all systems serving the premises, including HVAC, plumbing, electrical equipment, doors, glass, and fire-safety components, regardless of age or cause of failure.\nCasualty: Landlord may terminate after material damage. If landlord elects to restore, rent abates only when the entire premises is unusable. No outside restoration deadline is stated.\nRenewal: One five-year option at then-current fair market rent, but never less than 110% of the final year's rent. Tenant must give notice 15 months before expiration.\nHoldover: 200% of the final month's base rent plus additional rent and consequential damages.\n\nReturn only JSON matching the supplied schema. The summary should be an executive overview suitable for the clinic's founders. The keyPoints list should contain the most consequential issues in descending priority, with practical tenant-side recommendations."
        }
      ],
      "jsonSchema": {
        "type": "object",
        "properties": {
          "summary": {
            "type": "string",
            "description": "A concise executive summary of the overall risk profile and immediate negotiation priorities."
          },
          "keyPoints": {
            "type": "array",
            "description": "Material issues ordered from highest to lowest priority.",
            "items": {
              "type": "object",
              "properties": {
                "category": {
                  "type": "string",
                  "enum": [
                    "schedule",
                    "financial",
                    "operational",
                    "assignment",
                    "guaranty",
                    "exclusivity",
                    "repairs",
                    "relocation",
                    "casualty",
                    "renewal",
                    "other"
                  ]
                },
                "severity": {
                  "type": "string",
                  "enum": [
                    "critical",
                    "high",
                    "medium",
                    "low"
                  ]
                },
                "issue": {
                  "type": "string",
                  "description": "A clear statement of the risk or ambiguity."
                },
                "evidence": {
                  "type": "string",
                  "description": "The relevant language or fact from the term sheet."
                },
                "impact": {
                  "type": "string",
                  "description": "The plausible business consequence for the tenant."
                },
                "recommendation": {
                  "type": "string",
                  "description": "A practical tenant-side negotiation request or next step."
                }
              },
              "required": [
                "category",
                "severity",
                "issue",
                "evidence",
                "impact",
                "recommendation"
              ],
              "additionalProperties": false
            }
          }
        },
        "required": [
          "summary",
          "keyPoints"
        ],
        "additionalProperties": false,
        "name": "response",
        "strict": true,
        "schema": {
          "type": "object",
          "properties": {
            "summary": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "keyPoints": {
              "type": "array",
              "items": {
                "type": "string"
              }
            }
          },
          "required": [
            "summary",
            "keyPoints"
          ],
          "additionalProperties": false
        }
      }
    }
  ]'

runware run google:gemini@3.5-flash \
  outputFormat=JSON \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="Analyze the following landlord term sheet for a neighborhood physical therapy clinic. Identify material financial, operational, legal, and schedule risks from the tenant's perspective. Distinguish explicit terms from ambiguities, cite the relevant language, and prioritize issues that should be negotiated before the letter of intent is signed. Do not provide legal advice or assume facts not stated.

TERM SHEET
Premises: Approximately 4,800 rentable square feet at Harbor Point Commons, Suite 210.
Term: Ten years beginning on the earlier of (a) the clinic opening to patients or (b) 120 days after landlord delivers the premises.
Base rent: \$42.00 per rentable square foot in year one, increasing 3.5% annually.
Additional rent: Tenant pays its proportionate share of taxes, insurance, common-area maintenance, security, landscaping, snow removal, management fees, and capital expenditures. Controllable CAM increases are capped at 5% annually; taxes, insurance, utilities, security, snow removal, and capital expenditures are excluded from the cap.
Delivery: Landlord will deliver the premises broom-clean with existing building systems in their current condition. Tenant accepts the premises as-is.
Tenant improvements: Landlord provides an allowance of \$55.00 per rentable square foot, reimbursed after the clinic opens, final lien waivers are supplied, and tenant is not in default. Tenant pays all costs above the allowance. No deadline for reimbursement is stated.
Permits: Tenant is responsible for all zoning, accessibility, health, signage, and construction approvals. The term sheet contains no permit contingency or termination right.
Opening requirement: Tenant must open within 120 days after delivery and continuously operate during the term. Failure to open on time triggers rent commencement and a charge of \$750 per day.
Use: Outpatient physical therapy and related rehabilitation services only.
Exclusivity: Landlord will not lease another space in the center to a physical therapy clinic, excluding current tenants, their successors, hospital-affiliated providers, fitness operators, chiropractors, and tenants occupying more than 10,000 square feet.
Assignment: Any assignment, sublease, merger, sale of substantially all assets, or change in control requires landlord consent, which may be withheld in landlord's sole discretion. Landlord may recapture the premises.
Guaranty: Full personal guaranty from both founders for the entire term and all extensions.
Relocation: Landlord may relocate tenant once during the term to comparable premises in the center with 90 days' notice. Tenant must remain open during the move. Landlord pays reasonable physical moving costs; the term sheet does not address permits, downtime, new improvements, patient communications, or business interruption.
Repairs: Tenant maintains and replaces all systems serving the premises, including HVAC, plumbing, electrical equipment, doors, glass, and fire-safety components, regardless of age or cause of failure.
Casualty: Landlord may terminate after material damage. If landlord elects to restore, rent abates only when the entire premises is unusable. No outside restoration deadline is stated.
Renewal: One five-year option at then-current fair market rent, but never less than 110% of the final year's rent. Tenant must give notice 15 months before expiration.
Holdover: 200% of the final month's base rent plus additional rent and consequential damages.

Return only JSON matching the supplied schema. The summary should be an executive overview suitable for the clinic's founders. The keyPoints list should contain the most consequential issues in descending priority, with practical tenant-side recommendations." \
  jsonSchema.type=object \
  jsonSchema.properties.summary.type=string \
  jsonSchema.properties.summary.description="A concise executive summary of the overall risk profile and immediate negotiation priorities." \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.type=array \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.description="Material issues ordered from highest to lowest priority." \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.type=object \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.category.type=string \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.category.enum.0=schedule \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.category.enum.1=financial \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.category.enum.2=operational \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.category.enum.3=assignment \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.category.enum.4=guaranty \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.category.enum.5=exclusivity \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.category.enum.6=repairs \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.category.enum.7=relocation \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.category.enum.8=casualty \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.category.enum.9=renewal \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.category.enum.10=other \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.severity.type=string \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.severity.enum.0=critical \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.severity.enum.1=high \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.severity.enum.2=medium \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.severity.enum.3=low \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.issue.type=string \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.issue.description="A clear statement of the risk or ambiguity." \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.evidence.type=string \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.evidence.description="The relevant language or fact from the term sheet." \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.impact.type=string \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.impact.description="The plausible business consequence for the tenant." \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.recommendation.type=string \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.properties.recommendation.description="A practical tenant-side negotiation request or next step." \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.required.0=category \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.required.1=severity \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.required.2=issue \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.required.3=evidence \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.required.4=impact \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.required.5=recommendation \
  jsonSchema.properties.keyPoints.items.additionalProperties=false \
  jsonSchema.required.0=summary \
  jsonSchema.required.1=keyPoints \
  jsonSchema.additionalProperties=false \
  jsonSchema.name=response \
  jsonSchema.strict=true \
  jsonSchema.schema.type=object \
  jsonSchema.schema.properties.summary.type=string \
  jsonSchema.schema.properties.keyPoints.type=array \
  jsonSchema.schema.properties.keyPoints.items.type=string \
  jsonSchema.schema.required.0=summary \
  jsonSchema.schema.required.1=keyPoints \
  jsonSchema.schema.additionalProperties=false

{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "6a3d3618-3b31-40d1-b031-be59d8809686",
  "outputFormat": "JSON",
  "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "Analyze the following landlord term sheet for a neighborhood physical therapy clinic. Identify material financial, operational, legal, and schedule risks from the tenant's perspective. Distinguish explicit terms from ambiguities, cite the relevant language, and prioritize issues that should be negotiated before the letter of intent is signed. Do not provide legal advice or assume facts not stated.\n\nTERM SHEET\nPremises: Approximately 4,800 rentable square feet at Harbor Point Commons, Suite 210.\nTerm: Ten years beginning on the earlier of (a) the clinic opening to patients or (b) 120 days after landlord delivers the premises.\nBase rent: $42.00 per rentable square foot in year one, increasing 3.5% annually.\nAdditional rent: Tenant pays its proportionate share of taxes, insurance, common-area maintenance, security, landscaping, snow removal, management fees, and capital expenditures. Controllable CAM increases are capped at 5% annually; taxes, insurance, utilities, security, snow removal, and capital expenditures are excluded from the cap.\nDelivery: Landlord will deliver the premises broom-clean with existing building systems in their current condition. Tenant accepts the premises as-is.\nTenant improvements: Landlord provides an allowance of $55.00 per rentable square foot, reimbursed after the clinic opens, final lien waivers are supplied, and tenant is not in default. Tenant pays all costs above the allowance. No deadline for reimbursement is stated.\nPermits: Tenant is responsible for all zoning, accessibility, health, signage, and construction approvals. The term sheet contains no permit contingency or termination right.\nOpening requirement: Tenant must open within 120 days after delivery and continuously operate during the term. Failure to open on time triggers rent commencement and a charge of $750 per day.\nUse: Outpatient physical therapy and related rehabilitation services only.\nExclusivity: Landlord will not lease another space in the center to a physical therapy clinic, excluding current tenants, their successors, hospital-affiliated providers, fitness operators, chiropractors, and tenants occupying more than 10,000 square feet.\nAssignment: Any assignment, sublease, merger, sale of substantially all assets, or change in control requires landlord consent, which may be withheld in landlord's sole discretion. Landlord may recapture the premises.\nGuaranty: Full personal guaranty from both founders for the entire term and all extensions.\nRelocation: Landlord may relocate tenant once during the term to comparable premises in the center with 90 days' notice. Tenant must remain open during the move. Landlord pays reasonable physical moving costs; the term sheet does not address permits, downtime, new improvements, patient communications, or business interruption.\nRepairs: Tenant maintains and replaces all systems serving the premises, including HVAC, plumbing, electrical equipment, doors, glass, and fire-safety components, regardless of age or cause of failure.\nCasualty: Landlord may terminate after material damage. If landlord elects to restore, rent abates only when the entire premises is unusable. No outside restoration deadline is stated.\nRenewal: One five-year option at then-current fair market rent, but never less than 110% of the final year's rent. Tenant must give notice 15 months before expiration.\nHoldover: 200% of the final month's base rent plus additional rent and consequential damages.\n\nReturn only JSON matching the supplied schema. The summary should be an executive overview suitable for the clinic's founders. The keyPoints list should contain the most consequential issues in descending priority, with practical tenant-side recommendations."
    }
  ],
  "jsonSchema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "summary": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "A concise executive summary of the overall risk profile and immediate negotiation priorities."
      },
      "keyPoints": {
        "type": "array",
        "description": "Material issues ordered from highest to lowest priority.",
        "items": {
          "type": "object",
          "properties": {
            "category": {
              "type": "string",
              "enum": [
                "schedule",
                "financial",
                "operational",
                "assignment",
                "guaranty",
                "exclusivity",
                "repairs",
                "relocation",
                "casualty",
                "renewal",
                "other"
              ]
            },
            "severity": {
              "type": "string",
              "enum": [
                "critical",
                "high",
                "medium",
                "low"
              ]
            },
            "issue": {
              "type": "string",
              "description": "A clear statement of the risk or ambiguity."
            },
            "evidence": {
              "type": "string",
              "description": "The relevant language or fact from the term sheet."
            },
            "impact": {
              "type": "string",
              "description": "The plausible business consequence for the tenant."
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "type": "string",
              "description": "A practical tenant-side negotiation request or next step."
            }
          },
          "required": [
            "category",
            "severity",
            "issue",
            "evidence",
            "impact",
            "recommendation"
          ],
          "additionalProperties": false
        }
      }
    },
    "required": [
      "summary",
      "keyPoints"
    ],
    "additionalProperties": false,
    "name": "response",
    "strict": true,
    "schema": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "summary": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "keyPoints": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "type": "string"
          }
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "summary",
        "keyPoints"
      ],
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
  }
}

import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  model: 'google:gemini@3.5-flash',
  settings: {
    systemPrompt: 'You are a precise multimodal operations analyst. Base conclusions only on visible or audible evidence from the provided media, clearly separating observation from inference.',
    temperature: 0.35,
    topP: 0.9,
    maxTokens: 1800,
    thinkingLevel: 'medium'
  },
  providerSettings: {
    google: {
      mediaResolution: 'high'
    }
  },
  inputs: {
    videos: [
      'https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/966b7d69-ed7a-4c4a-a437-c5242851a8ef.mp4'
    ]
  },
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'Analyze the attached video as an operations safety reviewer. Provide: 1) a timestamped timeline of relevant events, 2) the most likely root cause of the interruption, 3) visible evidence supporting your conclusion, 4) any uncertainties or alternate explanations, and 5) three concrete changes to reduce recurrence. Keep the answer concise and use Markdown headings.'
    }
  ]
})

import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
            "settings": {
                "systemPrompt": "You are a precise multimodal operations analyst. Base conclusions only on visible or audible evidence from the provided media, clearly separating observation from inference.",
                "temperature": 0.35,
                "topP": 0.9,
                "maxTokens": 1800,
                "thinkingLevel": "medium"
            },
            "providerSettings": {
                "google": {
                    "mediaResolution": "high"
                }
            },
            "inputs": {
                "videos": [
                    "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/966b7d69-ed7a-4c4a-a437-c5242851a8ef.mp4"
                ]
            },
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "Analyze the attached video as an operations safety reviewer. Provide: 1) a timestamped timeline of relevant events, 2) the most likely root cause of the interruption, 3) visible evidence supporting your conclusion, 4) any uncertainties or alternate explanations, and 5) three concrete changes to reduce recurrence. Keep the answer concise and use Markdown headings."
                }
            ]
        })


asyncio.run(main())

curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "8b05e50d-8582-4352-9f66-1bb5136f762d",
      "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
      "settings": {
        "systemPrompt": "You are a precise multimodal operations analyst. Base conclusions only on visible or audible evidence from the provided media, clearly separating observation from inference.",
        "temperature": 0.35,
        "topP": 0.9,
        "maxTokens": 1800,
        "thinkingLevel": "medium"
      },
      "providerSettings": {
        "google": {
          "mediaResolution": "high"
        }
      },
      "inputs": {
        "videos": [
          "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/966b7d69-ed7a-4c4a-a437-c5242851a8ef.mp4"
        ]
      },
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "Analyze the attached video as an operations safety reviewer. Provide: 1) a timestamped timeline of relevant events, 2) the most likely root cause of the interruption, 3) visible evidence supporting your conclusion, 4) any uncertainties or alternate explanations, and 5) three concrete changes to reduce recurrence. Keep the answer concise and use Markdown headings."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]'

runware run google:gemini@3.5-flash \
  settings.systemPrompt="You are a precise multimodal operations analyst. Base conclusions only on visible or audible evidence from the provided media, clearly separating observation from inference." \
  settings.temperature=0.35 \
  settings.topP=0.9 \
  settings.maxTokens=1800 \
  settings.thinkingLevel=medium \
  providerSettings.google.mediaResolution=high \
  inputs.videos.0=https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/966b7d69-ed7a-4c4a-a437-c5242851a8ef.mp4 \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="Analyze the attached video as an operations safety reviewer. Provide: 1) a timestamped timeline of relevant events, 2) the most likely root cause of the interruption, 3) visible evidence supporting your conclusion, 4) any uncertainties or alternate explanations, and 5) three concrete changes to reduce recurrence. Keep the answer concise and use Markdown headings."

{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "8b05e50d-8582-4352-9f66-1bb5136f762d",
  "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
  "settings": {
    "systemPrompt": "You are a precise multimodal operations analyst. Base conclusions only on visible or audible evidence from the provided media, clearly separating observation from inference.",
    "temperature": 0.35,
    "topP": 0.9,
    "maxTokens": 1800,
    "thinkingLevel": "medium"
  },
  "providerSettings": {
    "google": {
      "mediaResolution": "high"
    }
  },
  "inputs": {
    "videos": [
      "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/966b7d69-ed7a-4c4a-a437-c5242851a8ef.mp4"
    ]
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "Analyze the attached video as an operations safety reviewer. Provide: 1) a timestamped timeline of relevant events, 2) the most likely root cause of the interruption, 3) visible evidence supporting your conclusion, 4) any uncertainties or alternate explanations, and 5) three concrete changes to reduce recurrence. Keep the answer concise and use Markdown headings."
    }
  ]
}

import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  model: 'google:gemini@3.5-flash',
  settings: {
    systemPrompt: 'You are a precise multimodal analyst. Base every claim on observable visual evidence, separate inference from certainty, and organize the answer clearly for an operations team.',
    temperature: 0.25,
    topP: 0.9,
    maxTokens: 1800,
    thinkingLevel: 'high'
  },
  providerSettings: {
    google: {
      mediaResolution: 'high'
    }
  },
  inputs: {
    videos: [
      'https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/0028cf6b-e521-4839-bdd7-2a5d78a9baac.mp4'
    ]
  },
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'Review the video as a safety and operations analyst. Provide a concise incident report with: 1) a one-paragraph summary, 2) a timestamped sequence of important events, 3) all readable text or labels, 4) equipment and people present, 5) likely safety risks, 6) recommended next actions, and 7) any uncertainty you have about the scene.'
    }
  ]
})

import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
            "settings": {
                "systemPrompt": "You are a precise multimodal analyst. Base every claim on observable visual evidence, separate inference from certainty, and organize the answer clearly for an operations team.",
                "temperature": 0.25,
                "topP": 0.9,
                "maxTokens": 1800,
                "thinkingLevel": "high"
            },
            "providerSettings": {
                "google": {
                    "mediaResolution": "high"
                }
            },
            "inputs": {
                "videos": [
                    "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/0028cf6b-e521-4839-bdd7-2a5d78a9baac.mp4"
                ]
            },
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "Review the video as a safety and operations analyst. Provide a concise incident report with: 1) a one-paragraph summary, 2) a timestamped sequence of important events, 3) all readable text or labels, 4) equipment and people present, 5) likely safety risks, 6) recommended next actions, and 7) any uncertainty you have about the scene."
                }
            ]
        })


asyncio.run(main())

curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "63f327d7-7ea8-4810-bbc8-cdbbc437d24b",
      "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
      "settings": {
        "systemPrompt": "You are a precise multimodal analyst. Base every claim on observable visual evidence, separate inference from certainty, and organize the answer clearly for an operations team.",
        "temperature": 0.25,
        "topP": 0.9,
        "maxTokens": 1800,
        "thinkingLevel": "high"
      },
      "providerSettings": {
        "google": {
          "mediaResolution": "high"
        }
      },
      "inputs": {
        "videos": [
          "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/0028cf6b-e521-4839-bdd7-2a5d78a9baac.mp4"
        ]
      },
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "Review the video as a safety and operations analyst. Provide a concise incident report with: 1) a one-paragraph summary, 2) a timestamped sequence of important events, 3) all readable text or labels, 4) equipment and people present, 5) likely safety risks, 6) recommended next actions, and 7) any uncertainty you have about the scene."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]'

runware run google:gemini@3.5-flash \
  settings.systemPrompt="You are a precise multimodal analyst. Base every claim on observable visual evidence, separate inference from certainty, and organize the answer clearly for an operations team." \
  settings.temperature=0.25 \
  settings.topP=0.9 \
  settings.maxTokens=1800 \
  settings.thinkingLevel=high \
  providerSettings.google.mediaResolution=high \
  inputs.videos.0=https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/0028cf6b-e521-4839-bdd7-2a5d78a9baac.mp4 \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="Review the video as a safety and operations analyst. Provide a concise incident report with: 1) a one-paragraph summary, 2) a timestamped sequence of important events, 3) all readable text or labels, 4) equipment and people present, 5) likely safety risks, 6) recommended next actions, and 7) any uncertainty you have about the scene."

{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "63f327d7-7ea8-4810-bbc8-cdbbc437d24b",
  "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
  "settings": {
    "systemPrompt": "You are a precise multimodal analyst. Base every claim on observable visual evidence, separate inference from certainty, and organize the answer clearly for an operations team.",
    "temperature": 0.25,
    "topP": 0.9,
    "maxTokens": 1800,
    "thinkingLevel": "high"
  },
  "providerSettings": {
    "google": {
      "mediaResolution": "high"
    }
  },
  "inputs": {
    "videos": [
      "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/0028cf6b-e521-4839-bdd7-2a5d78a9baac.mp4"
    ]
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "Review the video as a safety and operations analyst. Provide a concise incident report with: 1) a one-paragraph summary, 2) a timestamped sequence of important events, 3) all readable text or labels, 4) equipment and people present, 5) likely safety risks, 6) recommended next actions, and 7) any uncertainty you have about the scene."
    }
  ]
}

import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  model: 'google:gemini@3.5-flash',
  settings: {
    thinkingLevel: 'medium'
  },
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'Prepare a concise negotiation brief for our CFO and procurement lead ahead of a business-intelligence platform renewal.\n\nFacts:\n- Current contract: 220 seats at $70 per seat per month, totaling $184,800 annually.\n- Actual usage: 147 monthly active users and 126 weekly active users. Headcount is forecast to grow 8% next year.\n- Renewal quote: 240 seats at $78 per seat per month, totaling $224,640 annually, with standard support included.\n- Vendor will hold that price only if we sign a three-year term before its quarter ends in 12 days.\n- Our renewal date is in 30 days; non-renewal notice is due in 18 days.\n- Finance target: no more than $165,000 annually. Absolute walk-away ceiling: $180,000 annually.\n- Preferred term: 12 months. We could accept 24 months for a meaningful price concession, but not 36 months.\n- Credible alternative: $149,000 annually plus $18,000 one-time implementation, with an eight-week migration. It meets core needs but lacks two advanced forecasting features used by the finance team.\n- Required contract changes: no automatic renewal, annual data export at no charge, security-incident notice within 24 hours, and liability capped at twice annual fees rather than the vendor\'s proposed one-times-fees cap.\n- Low-cost items we can trade: public case-study participation after six successful months, quarterly product-feedback calls, consolidated annual billing, and signature before quarter end.\n\nCreate a decision-ready brief of no more than 700 words with these sections:\n1. Executive recommendation\n2. Cost and usage analysis, including percentage changes and a justified seat count\n3. Opening offer, target outcome, and walk-away position\n4. Prioritized contract terms: must-have, preferred, and tradable\n5. Three-step concession ladder in which every concession receives something in return\n6. Our strongest leverage and the vendor\'s likely counterarguments\n7. A short opening email to the account executive\n\nUse exact figures, distinguish first-year from recurring costs, flag assumptions, and avoid generic negotiation advice or unsupported market benchmarks.'
    }
  ]
})

import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
            "settings": {
                "thinkingLevel": "medium"
            },
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "Prepare a concise negotiation brief for our CFO and procurement lead ahead of a business-intelligence platform renewal.\n\nFacts:\n- Current contract: 220 seats at $70 per seat per month, totaling $184,800 annually.\n- Actual usage: 147 monthly active users and 126 weekly active users. Headcount is forecast to grow 8% next year.\n- Renewal quote: 240 seats at $78 per seat per month, totaling $224,640 annually, with standard support included.\n- Vendor will hold that price only if we sign a three-year term before its quarter ends in 12 days.\n- Our renewal date is in 30 days; non-renewal notice is due in 18 days.\n- Finance target: no more than $165,000 annually. Absolute walk-away ceiling: $180,000 annually.\n- Preferred term: 12 months. We could accept 24 months for a meaningful price concession, but not 36 months.\n- Credible alternative: $149,000 annually plus $18,000 one-time implementation, with an eight-week migration. It meets core needs but lacks two advanced forecasting features used by the finance team.\n- Required contract changes: no automatic renewal, annual data export at no charge, security-incident notice within 24 hours, and liability capped at twice annual fees rather than the vendor's proposed one-times-fees cap.\n- Low-cost items we can trade: public case-study participation after six successful months, quarterly product-feedback calls, consolidated annual billing, and signature before quarter end.\n\nCreate a decision-ready brief of no more than 700 words with these sections:\n1. Executive recommendation\n2. Cost and usage analysis, including percentage changes and a justified seat count\n3. Opening offer, target outcome, and walk-away position\n4. Prioritized contract terms: must-have, preferred, and tradable\n5. Three-step concession ladder in which every concession receives something in return\n6. Our strongest leverage and the vendor's likely counterarguments\n7. A short opening email to the account executive\n\nUse exact figures, distinguish first-year from recurring costs, flag assumptions, and avoid generic negotiation advice or unsupported market benchmarks."
                }
            ]
        })


asyncio.run(main())

curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "f43a60c5-76b9-4418-bc61-d798c2d80fdf",
      "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
      "settings": {
        "thinkingLevel": "medium"
      },
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "Prepare a concise negotiation brief for our CFO and procurement lead ahead of a business-intelligence platform renewal.\n\nFacts:\n- Current contract: 220 seats at $70 per seat per month, totaling $184,800 annually.\n- Actual usage: 147 monthly active users and 126 weekly active users. Headcount is forecast to grow 8% next year.\n- Renewal quote: 240 seats at $78 per seat per month, totaling $224,640 annually, with standard support included.\n- Vendor will hold that price only if we sign a three-year term before its quarter ends in 12 days.\n- Our renewal date is in 30 days; non-renewal notice is due in 18 days.\n- Finance target: no more than $165,000 annually. Absolute walk-away ceiling: $180,000 annually.\n- Preferred term: 12 months. We could accept 24 months for a meaningful price concession, but not 36 months.\n- Credible alternative: $149,000 annually plus $18,000 one-time implementation, with an eight-week migration. It meets core needs but lacks two advanced forecasting features used by the finance team.\n- Required contract changes: no automatic renewal, annual data export at no charge, security-incident notice within 24 hours, and liability capped at twice annual fees rather than the vendor's proposed one-times-fees cap.\n- Low-cost items we can trade: public case-study participation after six successful months, quarterly product-feedback calls, consolidated annual billing, and signature before quarter end.\n\nCreate a decision-ready brief of no more than 700 words with these sections:\n1. Executive recommendation\n2. Cost and usage analysis, including percentage changes and a justified seat count\n3. Opening offer, target outcome, and walk-away position\n4. Prioritized contract terms: must-have, preferred, and tradable\n5. Three-step concession ladder in which every concession receives something in return\n6. Our strongest leverage and the vendor's likely counterarguments\n7. A short opening email to the account executive\n\nUse exact figures, distinguish first-year from recurring costs, flag assumptions, and avoid generic negotiation advice or unsupported market benchmarks."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]'

runware run google:gemini@3.5-flash \
  settings.thinkingLevel=medium \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="Prepare a concise negotiation brief for our CFO and procurement lead ahead of a business-intelligence platform renewal.

Facts:
- Current contract: 220 seats at \$70 per seat per month, totaling \$184,800 annually.
- Actual usage: 147 monthly active users and 126 weekly active users. Headcount is forecast to grow 8% next year.
- Renewal quote: 240 seats at \$78 per seat per month, totaling \$224,640 annually, with standard support included.
- Vendor will hold that price only if we sign a three-year term before its quarter ends in 12 days.
- Our renewal date is in 30 days; non-renewal notice is due in 18 days.
- Finance target: no more than \$165,000 annually. Absolute walk-away ceiling: \$180,000 annually.
- Preferred term: 12 months. We could accept 24 months for a meaningful price concession, but not 36 months.
- Credible alternative: \$149,000 annually plus \$18,000 one-time implementation, with an eight-week migration. It meets core needs but lacks two advanced forecasting features used by the finance team.
- Required contract changes: no automatic renewal, annual data export at no charge, security-incident notice within 24 hours, and liability capped at twice annual fees rather than the vendor's proposed one-times-fees cap.
- Low-cost items we can trade: public case-study participation after six successful months, quarterly product-feedback calls, consolidated annual billing, and signature before quarter end.

Create a decision-ready brief of no more than 700 words with these sections:
1. Executive recommendation
2. Cost and usage analysis, including percentage changes and a justified seat count
3. Opening offer, target outcome, and walk-away position
4. Prioritized contract terms: must-have, preferred, and tradable
5. Three-step concession ladder in which every concession receives something in return
6. Our strongest leverage and the vendor's likely counterarguments
7. A short opening email to the account executive

Use exact figures, distinguish first-year from recurring costs, flag assumptions, and avoid generic negotiation advice or unsupported market benchmarks."

{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "f43a60c5-76b9-4418-bc61-d798c2d80fdf",
  "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
  "settings": {
    "thinkingLevel": "medium"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "Prepare a concise negotiation brief for our CFO and procurement lead ahead of a business-intelligence platform renewal.\n\nFacts:\n- Current contract: 220 seats at $70 per seat per month, totaling $184,800 annually.\n- Actual usage: 147 monthly active users and 126 weekly active users. Headcount is forecast to grow 8% next year.\n- Renewal quote: 240 seats at $78 per seat per month, totaling $224,640 annually, with standard support included.\n- Vendor will hold that price only if we sign a three-year term before its quarter ends in 12 days.\n- Our renewal date is in 30 days; non-renewal notice is due in 18 days.\n- Finance target: no more than $165,000 annually. Absolute walk-away ceiling: $180,000 annually.\n- Preferred term: 12 months. We could accept 24 months for a meaningful price concession, but not 36 months.\n- Credible alternative: $149,000 annually plus $18,000 one-time implementation, with an eight-week migration. It meets core needs but lacks two advanced forecasting features used by the finance team.\n- Required contract changes: no automatic renewal, annual data export at no charge, security-incident notice within 24 hours, and liability capped at twice annual fees rather than the vendor's proposed one-times-fees cap.\n- Low-cost items we can trade: public case-study participation after six successful months, quarterly product-feedback calls, consolidated annual billing, and signature before quarter end.\n\nCreate a decision-ready brief of no more than 700 words with these sections:\n1. Executive recommendation\n2. Cost and usage analysis, including percentage changes and a justified seat count\n3. Opening offer, target outcome, and walk-away position\n4. Prioritized contract terms: must-have, preferred, and tradable\n5. Three-step concession ladder in which every concession receives something in return\n6. Our strongest leverage and the vendor's likely counterarguments\n7. A short opening email to the account executive\n\nUse exact figures, distinguish first-year from recurring costs, flag assumptions, and avoid generic negotiation advice or unsupported market benchmarks."
    }
  ]
}

import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  model: 'google:gemini@3.5-flash',
  providerSettings: {
    google: {
      search: true
    }
  },
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'What is the current operating status of the Port of Savannah’s Garden City Terminal? Confirm whether truck gates are open on their normal schedule today and identify any active weather, rail, vessel, or terminal advisories that could delay container pickup. Answer in no more than five bullets, include an as-of timestamp in Eastern Time, and cite the most recent official Georgia Ports Authority or U.S. Coast Guard sources with links.'
    }
  ]
})

import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
            "providerSettings": {
                "google": {
                    "search": True
                }
            },
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "What is the current operating status of the Port of Savannah’s Garden City Terminal? Confirm whether truck gates are open on their normal schedule today and identify any active weather, rail, vessel, or terminal advisories that could delay container pickup. Answer in no more than five bullets, include an as-of timestamp in Eastern Time, and cite the most recent official Georgia Ports Authority or U.S. Coast Guard sources with links."
                }
            ]
        })


asyncio.run(main())

curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "c13dc71c-d707-4ca8-8c0e-7b013f421e20",
      "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
      "providerSettings": {
        "google": {
          "search": true
        }
      },
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "What is the current operating status of the Port of Savannah’s Garden City Terminal? Confirm whether truck gates are open on their normal schedule today and identify any active weather, rail, vessel, or terminal advisories that could delay container pickup. Answer in no more than five bullets, include an as-of timestamp in Eastern Time, and cite the most recent official Georgia Ports Authority or U.S. Coast Guard sources with links."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]'

runware run google:gemini@3.5-flash \
  providerSettings.google.search=true \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="What is the current operating status of the Port of Savannah’s Garden City Terminal? Confirm whether truck gates are open on their normal schedule today and identify any active weather, rail, vessel, or terminal advisories that could delay container pickup. Answer in no more than five bullets, include an as-of timestamp in Eastern Time, and cite the most recent official Georgia Ports Authority or U.S. Coast Guard sources with links."

{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "c13dc71c-d707-4ca8-8c0e-7b013f421e20",
  "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
  "providerSettings": {
    "google": {
      "search": true
    }
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "What is the current operating status of the Port of Savannah’s Garden City Terminal? Confirm whether truck gates are open on their normal schedule today and identify any active weather, rail, vessel, or terminal advisories that could delay container pickup. Answer in no more than five bullets, include an as-of timestamp in Eastern Time, and cite the most recent official Georgia Ports Authority or U.S. Coast Guard sources with links."
    }
  ]
}

import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  model: 'google:gemini@3.5-flash',
  settings: {
    systemPrompt: 'You are a production operations assistant. Never infer or invent live service health. Call the supplied status function and let the integration detect and execute the function call before presenting any status information.'
  },
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'What is the current service status? Check the live status source before answering.'
    }
  ],
  tools: [
    {
      type: 'function',
      name: 'get_service_status',
      description: 'Returns the current operational status of the service.',
      schema: {}
    }
  ],
  toolChoice: {
    type: 'tool',
    name: 'get_service_status'
  }
})

import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
            "settings": {
                "systemPrompt": "You are a production operations assistant. Never infer or invent live service health. Call the supplied status function and let the integration detect and execute the function call before presenting any status information."
            },
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "What is the current service status? Check the live status source before answering."
                }
            ],
            "tools": [
                {
                    "type": "function",
                    "name": "get_service_status",
                    "description": "Returns the current operational status of the service.",
                    "schema": {}
                }
            ],
            "toolChoice": {
                "type": "tool",
                "name": "get_service_status"
            }
        })


asyncio.run(main())

curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "31dae07b-37a0-4e8c-8f3e-076c6b0c6f33",
      "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
      "settings": {
        "systemPrompt": "You are a production operations assistant. Never infer or invent live service health. Call the supplied status function and let the integration detect and execute the function call before presenting any status information."
      },
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "What is the current service status? Check the live status source before answering."
        }
      ],
      "tools": [
        {
          "type": "function",
          "name": "get_service_status",
          "description": "Returns the current operational status of the service.",
          "schema": {}
        }
      ],
      "toolChoice": {
        "type": "tool",
        "name": "get_service_status"
      }
    }
  ]'

runware run google:gemini@3.5-flash \
  settings.systemPrompt="You are a production operations assistant. Never infer or invent live service health. Call the supplied status function and let the integration detect and execute the function call before presenting any status information." \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="What is the current service status? Check the live status source before answering." \
  tools.0.type=function \
  tools.0.name=get_service_status \
  tools.0.description="Returns the current operational status of the service." \
  toolChoice.type=tool \
  toolChoice.name=get_service_status

{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "31dae07b-37a0-4e8c-8f3e-076c6b0c6f33",
  "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
  "settings": {
    "systemPrompt": "You are a production operations assistant. Never infer or invent live service health. Call the supplied status function and let the integration detect and execute the function call before presenting any status information."
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "What is the current service status? Check the live status source before answering."
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "type": "function",
      "name": "get_service_status",
      "description": "Returns the current operational status of the service.",
      "schema": {}
    }
  ],
  "toolChoice": {
    "type": "tool",
    "name": "get_service_status"
  }
}

import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  model: 'google:gemini@3.5-flash',
  providerSettings: {
    google: {
      mediaResolution: 'high'
    }
  },
  inputs: {
    images: [
      'https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/b4acc43c-aa44-485c-801d-30415aee7784.jpg'
    ],
    videos: [
      'https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/57b41d8c-02f3-482c-ac44-5ed92a3842aa.mp4'
    ]
  },
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'Act as a retail merchandising auditor. Treat the image as the approved planogram reference and the video as the in-store audit evidence. Compare the visible shelf structure, product groupings, item positions, facing counts, empty spaces, shelf-edge labels, promotional materials, and obstructions across both assets.\n\nProduce a concise grounded compliance report with:\n1. An executive summary and overall status: Compliant, Partially Compliant, or Non-Compliant.\n2. A markdown table of discrepancies with columns: Video Timestamp, Shelf/Location, Reference Expectation, Observed Condition, Issue Type, Confidence, and Recommended Correction.\n3. A short list of elements that appear compliant.\n4. A prioritized corrective action list for store staff.\n\nUse timestamps from the video for every discrepancy. Describe products by visible brand, variant, package color, size, or category only when those details can be read or clearly distinguished. Do not invent SKU names, quantities, labels, or hidden shelf contents. If motion blur, glare, occlusion, or limited camera coverage prevents a reliable comparison, mark the finding as Uncertain and explain why. Base every conclusion solely on visible evidence in the supplied image and video.'
    }
  ]
})

import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
            "providerSettings": {
                "google": {
                    "mediaResolution": "high"
                }
            },
            "inputs": {
                "images": [
                    "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/b4acc43c-aa44-485c-801d-30415aee7784.jpg"
                ],
                "videos": [
                    "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/57b41d8c-02f3-482c-ac44-5ed92a3842aa.mp4"
                ]
            },
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "Act as a retail merchandising auditor. Treat the image as the approved planogram reference and the video as the in-store audit evidence. Compare the visible shelf structure, product groupings, item positions, facing counts, empty spaces, shelf-edge labels, promotional materials, and obstructions across both assets.\n\nProduce a concise grounded compliance report with:\n1. An executive summary and overall status: Compliant, Partially Compliant, or Non-Compliant.\n2. A markdown table of discrepancies with columns: Video Timestamp, Shelf/Location, Reference Expectation, Observed Condition, Issue Type, Confidence, and Recommended Correction.\n3. A short list of elements that appear compliant.\n4. A prioritized corrective action list for store staff.\n\nUse timestamps from the video for every discrepancy. Describe products by visible brand, variant, package color, size, or category only when those details can be read or clearly distinguished. Do not invent SKU names, quantities, labels, or hidden shelf contents. If motion blur, glare, occlusion, or limited camera coverage prevents a reliable comparison, mark the finding as Uncertain and explain why. Base every conclusion solely on visible evidence in the supplied image and video."
                }
            ]
        })


asyncio.run(main())

curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "ef6d43cb-aa55-4501-94f4-3d3b47140f1e",
      "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
      "providerSettings": {
        "google": {
          "mediaResolution": "high"
        }
      },
      "inputs": {
        "images": [
          "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/b4acc43c-aa44-485c-801d-30415aee7784.jpg"
        ],
        "videos": [
          "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/57b41d8c-02f3-482c-ac44-5ed92a3842aa.mp4"
        ]
      },
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "Act as a retail merchandising auditor. Treat the image as the approved planogram reference and the video as the in-store audit evidence. Compare the visible shelf structure, product groupings, item positions, facing counts, empty spaces, shelf-edge labels, promotional materials, and obstructions across both assets.\n\nProduce a concise grounded compliance report with:\n1. An executive summary and overall status: Compliant, Partially Compliant, or Non-Compliant.\n2. A markdown table of discrepancies with columns: Video Timestamp, Shelf/Location, Reference Expectation, Observed Condition, Issue Type, Confidence, and Recommended Correction.\n3. A short list of elements that appear compliant.\n4. A prioritized corrective action list for store staff.\n\nUse timestamps from the video for every discrepancy. Describe products by visible brand, variant, package color, size, or category only when those details can be read or clearly distinguished. Do not invent SKU names, quantities, labels, or hidden shelf contents. If motion blur, glare, occlusion, or limited camera coverage prevents a reliable comparison, mark the finding as Uncertain and explain why. Base every conclusion solely on visible evidence in the supplied image and video."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]'

runware run google:gemini@3.5-flash \
  providerSettings.google.mediaResolution=high \
  inputs.images.0=https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/b4acc43c-aa44-485c-801d-30415aee7784.jpg \
  inputs.videos.0=https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/57b41d8c-02f3-482c-ac44-5ed92a3842aa.mp4 \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="Act as a retail merchandising auditor. Treat the image as the approved planogram reference and the video as the in-store audit evidence. Compare the visible shelf structure, product groupings, item positions, facing counts, empty spaces, shelf-edge labels, promotional materials, and obstructions across both assets.

Produce a concise grounded compliance report with:
1. An executive summary and overall status: Compliant, Partially Compliant, or Non-Compliant.
2. A markdown table of discrepancies with columns: Video Timestamp, Shelf/Location, Reference Expectation, Observed Condition, Issue Type, Confidence, and Recommended Correction.
3. A short list of elements that appear compliant.
4. A prioritized corrective action list for store staff.

Use timestamps from the video for every discrepancy. Describe products by visible brand, variant, package color, size, or category only when those details can be read or clearly distinguished. Do not invent SKU names, quantities, labels, or hidden shelf contents. If motion blur, glare, occlusion, or limited camera coverage prevents a reliable comparison, mark the finding as Uncertain and explain why. Base every conclusion solely on visible evidence in the supplied image and video."

{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "ef6d43cb-aa55-4501-94f4-3d3b47140f1e",
  "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
  "providerSettings": {
    "google": {
      "mediaResolution": "high"
    }
  },
  "inputs": {
    "images": [
      "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/b4acc43c-aa44-485c-801d-30415aee7784.jpg"
    ],
    "videos": [
      "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/57b41d8c-02f3-482c-ac44-5ed92a3842aa.mp4"
    ]
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "Act as a retail merchandising auditor. Treat the image as the approved planogram reference and the video as the in-store audit evidence. Compare the visible shelf structure, product groupings, item positions, facing counts, empty spaces, shelf-edge labels, promotional materials, and obstructions across both assets.\n\nProduce a concise grounded compliance report with:\n1. An executive summary and overall status: Compliant, Partially Compliant, or Non-Compliant.\n2. A markdown table of discrepancies with columns: Video Timestamp, Shelf/Location, Reference Expectation, Observed Condition, Issue Type, Confidence, and Recommended Correction.\n3. A short list of elements that appear compliant.\n4. A prioritized corrective action list for store staff.\n\nUse timestamps from the video for every discrepancy. Describe products by visible brand, variant, package color, size, or category only when those details can be read or clearly distinguished. Do not invent SKU names, quantities, labels, or hidden shelf contents. If motion blur, glare, occlusion, or limited camera coverage prevents a reliable comparison, mark the finding as Uncertain and explain why. Base every conclusion solely on visible evidence in the supplied image and video."
    }
  ]
}

import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  model: 'google:gemini@3.5-flash',
  settings: {
    maxTokens: 8192,
    temperature: 0.35,
    topP: 0.9,
    thinkingLevel: 'high'
  },
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'Scenario: A city library’s pneumatic tube index, RFID shelving robots, and e-ink wayfinding signs disagree after a rare calendar rollover. Patrons are being sent to wrong floors, loan records flip between two values, and one robot keeps sealing returned books in archival capsules.\n\nTask: act as a senior AI engineer and reliability lead. Produce:\n1. a concise incident timeline from the clues below;\n2. likely root causes ranked by confidence;\n3. a minimal Python reproduction of the bug using deterministic sample data;\n4. a patch plan for the inventory reconciliation service;\n5. unit tests and property-style tests in pseudocode;\n6. a risk register with rollback steps;\n7. a short executive brief for nontechnical library staff.\n\nClues:\n- All failing records have shelf codes ending QZ-9.\n- Failures occur only when daylight saving offset and fiscal-week rollover happen in the same hour.\n- The reconciliation job sorts location tokens lexicographically, then merges conflicting writes by latest client timestamp.\n- The shelving robots cache floor maps for 47 minutes.\n- Manual checkouts remain accurate.\n\nBe specific, avoid handwaving, and call out assumptions.'
    }
  ]
})

import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
            "settings": {
                "maxTokens": 8192,
                "temperature": 0.35,
                "topP": 0.9,
                "thinkingLevel": "high"
            },
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "Scenario: A city library’s pneumatic tube index, RFID shelving robots, and e-ink wayfinding signs disagree after a rare calendar rollover. Patrons are being sent to wrong floors, loan records flip between two values, and one robot keeps sealing returned books in archival capsules.\n\nTask: act as a senior AI engineer and reliability lead. Produce:\n1. a concise incident timeline from the clues below;\n2. likely root causes ranked by confidence;\n3. a minimal Python reproduction of the bug using deterministic sample data;\n4. a patch plan for the inventory reconciliation service;\n5. unit tests and property-style tests in pseudocode;\n6. a risk register with rollback steps;\n7. a short executive brief for nontechnical library staff.\n\nClues:\n- All failing records have shelf codes ending QZ-9.\n- Failures occur only when daylight saving offset and fiscal-week rollover happen in the same hour.\n- The reconciliation job sorts location tokens lexicographically, then merges conflicting writes by latest client timestamp.\n- The shelving robots cache floor maps for 47 minutes.\n- Manual checkouts remain accurate.\n\nBe specific, avoid handwaving, and call out assumptions."
                }
            ]
        })


asyncio.run(main())

curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "d9fd832d-f7a9-464b-96af-b9a555f4e816",
      "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
      "settings": {
        "maxTokens": 8192,
        "temperature": 0.35,
        "topP": 0.9,
        "thinkingLevel": "high"
      },
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "Scenario: A city library’s pneumatic tube index, RFID shelving robots, and e-ink wayfinding signs disagree after a rare calendar rollover. Patrons are being sent to wrong floors, loan records flip between two values, and one robot keeps sealing returned books in archival capsules.\n\nTask: act as a senior AI engineer and reliability lead. Produce:\n1. a concise incident timeline from the clues below;\n2. likely root causes ranked by confidence;\n3. a minimal Python reproduction of the bug using deterministic sample data;\n4. a patch plan for the inventory reconciliation service;\n5. unit tests and property-style tests in pseudocode;\n6. a risk register with rollback steps;\n7. a short executive brief for nontechnical library staff.\n\nClues:\n- All failing records have shelf codes ending QZ-9.\n- Failures occur only when daylight saving offset and fiscal-week rollover happen in the same hour.\n- The reconciliation job sorts location tokens lexicographically, then merges conflicting writes by latest client timestamp.\n- The shelving robots cache floor maps for 47 minutes.\n- Manual checkouts remain accurate.\n\nBe specific, avoid handwaving, and call out assumptions."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]'

runware run google:gemini@3.5-flash \
  settings.maxTokens=8192 \
  settings.temperature=0.35 \
  settings.topP=0.9 \
  settings.thinkingLevel=high \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="Scenario: A city library’s pneumatic tube index, RFID shelving robots, and e-ink wayfinding signs disagree after a rare calendar rollover. Patrons are being sent to wrong floors, loan records flip between two values, and one robot keeps sealing returned books in archival capsules.

Task: act as a senior AI engineer and reliability lead. Produce:
1. a concise incident timeline from the clues below;
2. likely root causes ranked by confidence;
3. a minimal Python reproduction of the bug using deterministic sample data;
4. a patch plan for the inventory reconciliation service;
5. unit tests and property-style tests in pseudocode;
6. a risk register with rollback steps;
7. a short executive brief for nontechnical library staff.

Clues:
- All failing records have shelf codes ending QZ-9.
- Failures occur only when daylight saving offset and fiscal-week rollover happen in the same hour.
- The reconciliation job sorts location tokens lexicographically, then merges conflicting writes by latest client timestamp.
- The shelving robots cache floor maps for 47 minutes.
- Manual checkouts remain accurate.

Be specific, avoid handwaving, and call out assumptions."

{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "d9fd832d-f7a9-464b-96af-b9a555f4e816",
  "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
  "settings": {
    "maxTokens": 8192,
    "temperature": 0.35,
    "topP": 0.9,
    "thinkingLevel": "high"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "Scenario: A city library’s pneumatic tube index, RFID shelving robots, and e-ink wayfinding signs disagree after a rare calendar rollover. Patrons are being sent to wrong floors, loan records flip between two values, and one robot keeps sealing returned books in archival capsules.\n\nTask: act as a senior AI engineer and reliability lead. Produce:\n1. a concise incident timeline from the clues below;\n2. likely root causes ranked by confidence;\n3. a minimal Python reproduction of the bug using deterministic sample data;\n4. a patch plan for the inventory reconciliation service;\n5. unit tests and property-style tests in pseudocode;\n6. a risk register with rollback steps;\n7. a short executive brief for nontechnical library staff.\n\nClues:\n- All failing records have shelf codes ending QZ-9.\n- Failures occur only when daylight saving offset and fiscal-week rollover happen in the same hour.\n- The reconciliation job sorts location tokens lexicographically, then merges conflicting writes by latest client timestamp.\n- The shelving robots cache floor maps for 47 minutes.\n- Manual checkouts remain accurate.\n\nBe specific, avoid handwaving, and call out assumptions."
    }
  ]
}

import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  model: 'google:gemini@3.5-flash',
  seed: 51190,
  settings: {
    systemPrompt: 'You are a senior AI engineer specializing in distributed systems, TypeScript, safety-critical automation, and production incident analysis. Be precise, practical, and structured.',
    temperature: 0.35,
    topP: 0.9,
    thinkingLevel: 'high',
    maxTokens: 8192
  },
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'A cargo climber network on an equatorial orbital elevator is experiencing a packet storm during peak ascent windows. Symptoms: duplicate berth reservations, battery-swap cancellations after approval, and rare out-of-order emergency-priority messages. Operators suspect a race condition in the reservation coordinator below.\n\nReview the simplified TypeScript service and produce a production-ready response:\n\n```ts\ntype Priority = "standard" | "urgent" | "emergency";\n\ntype Reservation = {\n  id: string;\n  climberId: string;\n  berthId: string;\n  priority: Priority;\n  status: "pending" | "approved" | "cancelled";\n  createdAt: number;\n};\n\nconst reservations = new Map<string, Reservation>();\nconst berthLocks = new Map<string, boolean>();\nconst queue: Reservation[] = [];\n\nexport async function reserveBerth(input: Omit<Reservation, "status" | "createdAt">) {\n  const reservation: Reservation = {\n    ...input,\n    status: "pending",\n    createdAt: Date.now()\n  };\n\n  reservations.set(reservation.id, reservation);\n  queue.push(reservation);\n  processQueue();\n  return reservation;\n}\n\nexport async function cancelReservation(id: string) {\n  const reservation = reservations.get(id);\n  if (!reservation) return false;\n\n  reservation.status = "cancelled";\n  reservations.set(id, reservation);\n  berthLocks.delete(reservation.berthId);\n  return true;\n}\n\nasync function processQueue() {\n  queue.sort((a, b) => {\n    const rank = { emergency: 0, urgent: 1, standard: 2 };\n    return rank[a.priority] - rank[b.priority] || a.createdAt - b.createdAt;\n  });\n\n  while (queue.length > 0) {\n    const next = queue.shift()!;\n    if (next.status !== "pending") continue;\n    if (berthLocks.get(next.berthId)) continue;\n\n    berthLocks.set(next.berthId, true);\n    await notifyClimber(next.climberId, next.berthId);\n    next.status = "approved";\n    reservations.set(next.id, next);\n  }\n}\n\nasync function notifyClimber(climberId: string, berthId: string) {\n  await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, Math.random() * 50));\n  console.log(`Approved ${climberId} for ${berthId}`);\n}\n```\n\nPlease provide:\n1. A concise root-cause analysis with at least five distinct failure modes.\n2. A corrected TypeScript implementation that prevents concurrent processors from corrupting queue state.\n3. A small deterministic priority-queue approach or equivalent ordering mechanism.\n4. A state-transition policy for pending, approved, and cancelled reservations.\n5. A focused test plan with cases for duplicate requests, cancellation during notification, emergency preemption, and retry behavior.\n6. A staged production rollout plan for a safety-critical environment.\n\nKeep the answer readable for both engineering leads and on-call responders.'
    }
  ]
})

import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
            "seed": 51190,
            "settings": {
                "systemPrompt": "You are a senior AI engineer specializing in distributed systems, TypeScript, safety-critical automation, and production incident analysis. Be precise, practical, and structured.",
                "temperature": 0.35,
                "topP": 0.9,
                "thinkingLevel": "high",
                "maxTokens": 8192
            },
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "A cargo climber network on an equatorial orbital elevator is experiencing a packet storm during peak ascent windows. Symptoms: duplicate berth reservations, battery-swap cancellations after approval, and rare out-of-order emergency-priority messages. Operators suspect a race condition in the reservation coordinator below.\n\nReview the simplified TypeScript service and produce a production-ready response:\n\n```ts\ntype Priority = \"standard\" | \"urgent\" | \"emergency\";\n\ntype Reservation = {\n  id: string;\n  climberId: string;\n  berthId: string;\n  priority: Priority;\n  status: \"pending\" | \"approved\" | \"cancelled\";\n  createdAt: number;\n};\n\nconst reservations = new Map<string, Reservation>();\nconst berthLocks = new Map<string, boolean>();\nconst queue: Reservation[] = [];\n\nexport async function reserveBerth(input: Omit<Reservation, \"status\" | \"createdAt\">) {\n  const reservation: Reservation = {\n    ...input,\n    status: \"pending\",\n    createdAt: Date.now()\n  };\n\n  reservations.set(reservation.id, reservation);\n  queue.push(reservation);\n  processQueue();\n  return reservation;\n}\n\nexport async function cancelReservation(id: string) {\n  const reservation = reservations.get(id);\n  if (!reservation) return false;\n\n  reservation.status = \"cancelled\";\n  reservations.set(id, reservation);\n  berthLocks.delete(reservation.berthId);\n  return true;\n}\n\nasync function processQueue() {\n  queue.sort((a, b) => {\n    const rank = { emergency: 0, urgent: 1, standard: 2 };\n    return rank[a.priority] - rank[b.priority] || a.createdAt - b.createdAt;\n  });\n\n  while (queue.length > 0) {\n    const next = queue.shift()!;\n    if (next.status !== \"pending\") continue;\n    if (berthLocks.get(next.berthId)) continue;\n\n    berthLocks.set(next.berthId, true);\n    await notifyClimber(next.climberId, next.berthId);\n    next.status = \"approved\";\n    reservations.set(next.id, next);\n  }\n}\n\nasync function notifyClimber(climberId: string, berthId: string) {\n  await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, Math.random() * 50));\n  console.log(`Approved ${climberId} for ${berthId}`);\n}\n```\n\nPlease provide:\n1. A concise root-cause analysis with at least five distinct failure modes.\n2. A corrected TypeScript implementation that prevents concurrent processors from corrupting queue state.\n3. A small deterministic priority-queue approach or equivalent ordering mechanism.\n4. A state-transition policy for pending, approved, and cancelled reservations.\n5. A focused test plan with cases for duplicate requests, cancellation during notification, emergency preemption, and retry behavior.\n6. A staged production rollout plan for a safety-critical environment.\n\nKeep the answer readable for both engineering leads and on-call responders."
                }
            ]
        })


asyncio.run(main())

curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "e2702e0f-77f8-4779-a496-b11a7cc1338b",
      "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
      "seed": 51190,
      "settings": {
        "systemPrompt": "You are a senior AI engineer specializing in distributed systems, TypeScript, safety-critical automation, and production incident analysis. Be precise, practical, and structured.",
        "temperature": 0.35,
        "topP": 0.9,
        "thinkingLevel": "high",
        "maxTokens": 8192
      },
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "A cargo climber network on an equatorial orbital elevator is experiencing a packet storm during peak ascent windows. Symptoms: duplicate berth reservations, battery-swap cancellations after approval, and rare out-of-order emergency-priority messages. Operators suspect a race condition in the reservation coordinator below.\n\nReview the simplified TypeScript service and produce a production-ready response:\n\n```ts\ntype Priority = \"standard\" | \"urgent\" | \"emergency\";\n\ntype Reservation = {\n  id: string;\n  climberId: string;\n  berthId: string;\n  priority: Priority;\n  status: \"pending\" | \"approved\" | \"cancelled\";\n  createdAt: number;\n};\n\nconst reservations = new Map<string, Reservation>();\nconst berthLocks = new Map<string, boolean>();\nconst queue: Reservation[] = [];\n\nexport async function reserveBerth(input: Omit<Reservation, \"status\" | \"createdAt\">) {\n  const reservation: Reservation = {\n    ...input,\n    status: \"pending\",\n    createdAt: Date.now()\n  };\n\n  reservations.set(reservation.id, reservation);\n  queue.push(reservation);\n  processQueue();\n  return reservation;\n}\n\nexport async function cancelReservation(id: string) {\n  const reservation = reservations.get(id);\n  if (!reservation) return false;\n\n  reservation.status = \"cancelled\";\n  reservations.set(id, reservation);\n  berthLocks.delete(reservation.berthId);\n  return true;\n}\n\nasync function processQueue() {\n  queue.sort((a, b) => {\n    const rank = { emergency: 0, urgent: 1, standard: 2 };\n    return rank[a.priority] - rank[b.priority] || a.createdAt - b.createdAt;\n  });\n\n  while (queue.length > 0) {\n    const next = queue.shift()!;\n    if (next.status !== \"pending\") continue;\n    if (berthLocks.get(next.berthId)) continue;\n\n    berthLocks.set(next.berthId, true);\n    await notifyClimber(next.climberId, next.berthId);\n    next.status = \"approved\";\n    reservations.set(next.id, next);\n  }\n}\n\nasync function notifyClimber(climberId: string, berthId: string) {\n  await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, Math.random() * 50));\n  console.log(`Approved ${climberId} for ${berthId}`);\n}\n```\n\nPlease provide:\n1. A concise root-cause analysis with at least five distinct failure modes.\n2. A corrected TypeScript implementation that prevents concurrent processors from corrupting queue state.\n3. A small deterministic priority-queue approach or equivalent ordering mechanism.\n4. A state-transition policy for pending, approved, and cancelled reservations.\n5. A focused test plan with cases for duplicate requests, cancellation during notification, emergency preemption, and retry behavior.\n6. A staged production rollout plan for a safety-critical environment.\n\nKeep the answer readable for both engineering leads and on-call responders."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]'

runware run google:gemini@3.5-flash \
  seed=51190 \
  settings.systemPrompt="You are a senior AI engineer specializing in distributed systems, TypeScript, safety-critical automation, and production incident analysis. Be precise, practical, and structured." \
  settings.temperature=0.35 \
  settings.topP=0.9 \
  settings.thinkingLevel=high \
  settings.maxTokens=8192 \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="A cargo climber network on an equatorial orbital elevator is experiencing a packet storm during peak ascent windows. Symptoms: duplicate berth reservations, battery-swap cancellations after approval, and rare out-of-order emergency-priority messages. Operators suspect a race condition in the reservation coordinator below.

Review the simplified TypeScript service and produce a production-ready response:

\`\`\`ts
type Priority = \"standard\" | \"urgent\" | \"emergency\";

type Reservation = {
  id: string;
  climberId: string;
  berthId: string;
  priority: Priority;
  status: \"pending\" | \"approved\" | \"cancelled\";
  createdAt: number;
};

const reservations = new Map<string, Reservation>();
const berthLocks = new Map<string, boolean>();
const queue: Reservation[] = [];

export async function reserveBerth(input: Omit<Reservation, \"status\" | \"createdAt\">) {
  const reservation: Reservation = {
    ...input,
    status: \"pending\",
    createdAt: Date.now()
  };

  reservations.set(reservation.id, reservation);
  queue.push(reservation);
  processQueue();
  return reservation;
}

export async function cancelReservation(id: string) {
  const reservation = reservations.get(id);
  if (!reservation) return false;

  reservation.status = \"cancelled\";
  reservations.set(id, reservation);
  berthLocks.delete(reservation.berthId);
  return true;
}

async function processQueue() {
  queue.sort((a, b) => {
    const rank = { emergency: 0, urgent: 1, standard: 2 };
    return rank[a.priority] - rank[b.priority] || a.createdAt - b.createdAt;
  });

  while (queue.length > 0) {
    const next = queue.shift()!;
    if (next.status !== \"pending\") continue;
    if (berthLocks.get(next.berthId)) continue;

    berthLocks.set(next.berthId, true);
    await notifyClimber(next.climberId, next.berthId);
    next.status = \"approved\";
    reservations.set(next.id, next);
  }
}

async function notifyClimber(climberId: string, berthId: string) {
  await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, Math.random() * 50));
  console.log(\`Approved \${climberId} for \${berthId}\`);
}
\`\`\`

Please provide:
1. A concise root-cause analysis with at least five distinct failure modes.
2. A corrected TypeScript implementation that prevents concurrent processors from corrupting queue state.
3. A small deterministic priority-queue approach or equivalent ordering mechanism.
4. A state-transition policy for pending, approved, and cancelled reservations.
5. A focused test plan with cases for duplicate requests, cancellation during notification, emergency preemption, and retry behavior.
6. A staged production rollout plan for a safety-critical environment.

Keep the answer readable for both engineering leads and on-call responders."

{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "e2702e0f-77f8-4779-a496-b11a7cc1338b",
  "model": "google:gemini@3.5-flash",
  "seed": 51190,
  "settings": {
    "systemPrompt": "You are a senior AI engineer specializing in distributed systems, TypeScript, safety-critical automation, and production incident analysis. Be precise, practical, and structured.",
    "temperature": 0.35,
    "topP": 0.9,
    "thinkingLevel": "high",
    "maxTokens": 8192
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "A cargo climber network on an equatorial orbital elevator is experiencing a packet storm during peak ascent windows. Symptoms: duplicate berth reservations, battery-swap cancellations after approval, and rare out-of-order emergency-priority messages. Operators suspect a race condition in the reservation coordinator below.\n\nReview the simplified TypeScript service and produce a production-ready response:\n\n```ts\ntype Priority = \"standard\" | \"urgent\" | \"emergency\";\n\ntype Reservation = {\n  id: string;\n  climberId: string;\n  berthId: string;\n  priority: Priority;\n  status: \"pending\" | \"approved\" | \"cancelled\";\n  createdAt: number;\n};\n\nconst reservations = new Map<string, Reservation>();\nconst berthLocks = new Map<string, boolean>();\nconst queue: Reservation[] = [];\n\nexport async function reserveBerth(input: Omit<Reservation, \"status\" | \"createdAt\">) {\n  const reservation: Reservation = {\n    ...input,\n    status: \"pending\",\n    createdAt: Date.now()\n  };\n\n  reservations.set(reservation.id, reservation);\n  queue.push(reservation);\n  processQueue();\n  return reservation;\n}\n\nexport async function cancelReservation(id: string) {\n  const reservation = reservations.get(id);\n  if (!reservation) return false;\n\n  reservation.status = \"cancelled\";\n  reservations.set(id, reservation);\n  berthLocks.delete(reservation.berthId);\n  return true;\n}\n\nasync function processQueue() {\n  queue.sort((a, b) => {\n    const rank = { emergency: 0, urgent: 1, standard: 2 };\n    return rank[a.priority] - rank[b.priority] || a.createdAt - b.createdAt;\n  });\n\n  while (queue.length > 0) {\n    const next = queue.shift()!;\n    if (next.status !== \"pending\") continue;\n    if (berthLocks.get(next.berthId)) continue;\n\n    berthLocks.set(next.berthId, true);\n    await notifyClimber(next.climberId, next.berthId);\n    next.status = \"approved\";\n    reservations.set(next.id, next);\n  }\n}\n\nasync function notifyClimber(climberId: string, berthId: string) {\n  await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, Math.random() * 50));\n  console.log(`Approved ${climberId} for ${berthId}`);\n}\n```\n\nPlease provide:\n1. A concise root-cause analysis with at least five distinct failure modes.\n2. A corrected TypeScript implementation that prevents concurrent processors from corrupting queue state.\n3. A small deterministic priority-queue approach or equivalent ordering mechanism.\n4. A state-transition policy for pending, approved, and cancelled reservations.\n5. A focused test plan with cases for duplicate requests, cancellation during notification, emergency preemption, and retry behavior.\n6. A staged production rollout plan for a safety-critical environment.\n\nKeep the answer readable for both engineering leads and on-call responders."
    }
  ]
}