live
MODEL IDopenai-gpt-5-mini

GPT-5 Mini

OpenAI
by 400K context

GPT-5 Mini is a faster, more cost-efficient variant of GPT-5 designed for well-defined tasks, precise prompts, and high-volume production use. OpenAI positions it for cost-sensitive, low-latency workloads while retaining strong reasoning ability, 400K context, 128K max output tokens, image input support, and compatibility with structured outputs and function calling.

GPT-5 Mini

structured-output

Commercial Lease Abstract Dataset$0.0083~34s
{"title":"Controlling-Term Lease Abstract","summary":"This abstract reflects the ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE executed 2026-09-15 as modified by the FIRST AMENDMENT executed 2026-12-10. Where the Amendment expressly modifies the Lease, the Amendment controls. All dates are normalized to YYYY-MM-DD and monetary amounts are shown as numbers without currency symbols or commas. Quotes cite the source section and reproduce short exact excerpts from the supplied texts.","keyPoints":[ "Original Lease Execution Date — 2026-09-15. Source: ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE header. Exact quote: \"Executed: September 15, 2026\" (Original Office Lease).", "First Amendment Execution Date — 2026-12-10. Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE header. Exact quote: \"Executed: December 10, 2026\" (First Amendment).", "Parties — Landlord: Harbor Exchange Owner LLC; Tenant: Meridian Cartography, Inc. Source: ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE, 'Parties.' Exact quote: \"Harbor Exchange Owner LLC (Landlord) and Meridian Cartography, Inc. (Tenant).\" (Section labeled 'Parties').", "Premises — Suites and Rentable Area (amended): Suites 410 and 425; 21300 rentable square feet. Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 1 — 'Premises.' Exact quote: \"Effective on the Commencement Date, Suite 425 is added to the Premises. The combined Premises consist of Suites 410 and 425 and contain 21,300 rentable square feet.\" (Section 1).", "Tenant's Proportionate Share — 9.37% (amended). Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 1 — 'Premises.' Exact quote: \"Tenant's Proportionate Share is revised to 9.37%.\" (Section 1).", "Term — Commencement and Expiration (amended): Term begins 2027-02-01 and expires 2037-01-31. Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 2 — 'Commencement and Expiration.' Exact quote: \"The Term begins February 1, 2027 and expires January 31, 2037.\" (Section 2).", "Base Rent — Monthly schedule (amended): 2027-02-01 to 2030-01-31: 53250.00; 2030-02-01 to 2033-01-31: 58575.00; 2033-02-01 to 2036-01-31: 64432.50; 2036-02-01 to 2037-01-31: 70875.75. Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 3 — 'Base Rent and Abatement.' Exact quote: \"Monthly Base Rent is: February 1, 2027 through January 31, 2030: $53,250.00; February 1, 2030 through January 31, 2033: $58,575.00; February 1, 2033 through January 31, 2036: $64,432.50; and February 1, 2036 through January 31, 2037: $70,875.75.\" (Section 3).", "Base Rent Abatement — First four full calendar months of the Term (amended). Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations during abatement. Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 3 — 'Base Rent and Abatement.' Exact quote: \"Notwithstanding Section 3.2 of the Lease, Base Rent is abated for the first four full calendar months of the Term. Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations during the abatement period.\" (Section 3).", "Operating Expenses — Base stop, cap, exclusions (original, proportionate share amended): Beginning on the Commencement Date Tenant shall pay Tenant's Proportionate Share of increases in Operating Expenses over the 2027 calendar-year base stop of $12.00 per rentable square foot; Controllable Operating Expenses cap 5% per calendar year cumulative compounded; exclusions listed. Tenant's Proportionate Share is 9.37% per Amendment. Sources and exact quotes: ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE, Section 4.1 — \"Beginning on the Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay Tenant's Proportionate Share of increases in Operating Expenses over the 2027 calendar-year base stop of $12.00 per rentable square foot. ... Controllable Operating Expenses may not increase by more than 5% per calendar year on a cumulative, compounded basis. Taxes, insurance, utilities, snow removal, security costs, and costs arising from changes in law are excluded from the cap.\" (Section 4.1); FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 1 — \"Tenant's Proportionate Share is revised to 9.37%.\" (Section 1).", "Security Deposit — Initial and reduction (amended): initial 159750.00 due upon execution; reduced to 79875.00 on 2030-02-01 provided no Event of Default. Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 4 — 'Security Deposit.' Exact quote: \"Section 5.1 is amended so that the initial Security Deposit is $159,750.00 and, provided no Event of Default has occurred, it is reduced to $79,875.00 on February 1, 2030.\" (Section 4).", "Assignment and Subletting — Landlord consent required except for Affiliate/merger/sale as provided (original). Source: ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE, Section 12.3 — 'Assignment and Subletting.' Exact quote: \"Tenant may not assign this Lease or sublet any portion of the Premises without Landlord's prior written consent, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. No consent is required for an assignment to an Affiliate or in connection with a merger or sale of substantially all of Tenant's assets, provided the successor has a net worth at least equal to Tenant's net worth immediately before the transaction and Tenant gives Landlord at least 15 days' prior written notice.\" (Section 12.3).", "Renewal Option — One five-year option at 95% of Fair Market Rent; exercise window amended to notice delivery no earlier than 18 months and no later than 15 months before expiration; other conditions in Section 18.2 remain unchanged. Sources and exact quotes: ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE, Section 18.2 — \"Tenant has one option to renew the entire Premises for five years at 95% of Fair Market Rent. Tenant must exercise the option by written notice delivered no earlier than 15 months and no later than 12 months before expiration. The option is unavailable if Tenant is in monetary default when notice is given or on the renewal commencement date.\" (Section 18.2); FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 5 — \"The renewal option remains one five-year option at 95% of Fair Market Rent. The exercise window is changed: notice must be delivered no earlier than 18 months and no later than 15 months before expiration. All other conditions in Section 18.2 remain unchanged.\" (Section 5).", "Notices — Addresses and attention lines (original): Notices to Landlord to Harbor Exchange Owner LLC, 100 Riverfront Plaza, Suite 900, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Asset Manager, with a copy to Bell & Crowe LLP, 50 North Laura Street, Suite 2400, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Real Estate Department. Notices to Tenant to Meridian Cartography, Inc., Suite 410, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Chief Financial Officer. Source: ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE, Section 24.1 — 'Notices.' Exact quote: \"Notices to Landlord shall be delivered to Harbor Exchange Owner LLC, 100 Riverfront Plaza, Suite 900, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Asset Manager, with a copy to Bell & Crowe LLP, 50 North Laura Street, Suite 2400, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Real Estate Department. Notices to Tenant shall be delivered to Meridian Cartography, Inc., Suite 410, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Chief Financial Officer.\" (Section 24.1).", "Abatement responsibility during abatement — Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations (amended). Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 3 — 'Base Rent and Abatement.' Exact quote: \"Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations during the abatement period.\" (Section 3)."]}
Finish reason: stop
Try in Playground
import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  outputFormat: 'JSON',
  model: 'openai:gpt@5-mini',
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'Create a controlling-term lease abstract from the original lease and amendment below. Reconcile conflicts by applying the amendment where it expressly modifies the original lease. Use only the supplied text; do not infer missing provisions or provide legal advice. Normalize dates as YYYY-MM-DD and monetary amounts as numbers without currency symbols or commas. Every extracted term must cite its source section and include a short exact quote. Return parsed JSON only, matching the supplied schema.\n\nORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE\nExecuted: September 15, 2026\n\nParties. Harbor Exchange Owner LLC (Landlord) and Meridian Cartography, Inc. (Tenant).\n\nSection 1.1 — Premises. Landlord leases to Tenant Suite 410 at Harbor Exchange, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, Florida, containing approximately 18,750 rentable square feet.\n\nSection 2.1 — Term. The Term begins January 1, 2027 and expires December 31, 2036.\n\nSection 3.1 — Base Rent. Tenant shall pay monthly Base Rent as follows: January 1, 2027 through December 31, 2029: $46,875.00; January 1, 2030 through December 31, 2032: $51,562.50; January 1, 2033 through December 31, 2035: $56,718.75; and January 1, 2036 through December 31, 2036: $62,390.63.\n\nSection 3.2 — Abatement. Base Rent is abated for the first three full calendar months of the Term. Tenant remains responsible during that period for Additional Rent and all other obligations.\n\nSection 4.1 — Operating Expenses. Beginning on the Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay Tenant\'s Proportionate Share of increases in Operating Expenses over the 2027 calendar-year base stop of $12.00 per rentable square foot. Tenant\'s Proportionate Share is 8.25%. Controllable Operating Expenses may not increase by more than 5% per calendar year on a cumulative, compounded basis. Taxes, insurance, utilities, snow removal, security costs, and costs arising from changes in law are excluded from the cap.\n\nSection 5.1 — Security Deposit. Upon execution, Tenant shall deposit $140,625.00. Provided no Event of Default has occurred, the deposit shall be reduced to $70,312.50 on January 1, 2030.\n\nSection 12.3 — Assignment and Subletting. Tenant may not assign this Lease or sublet any portion of the Premises without Landlord\'s prior written consent, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. No consent is required for an assignment to an Affiliate or in connection with a merger or sale of substantially all of Tenant\'s assets, provided the successor has a net worth at least equal to Tenant\'s net worth immediately before the transaction and Tenant gives Landlord at least 15 days\' prior written notice.\n\nSection 18.2 — Renewal Option. Tenant has one option to renew the entire Premises for five years at 95% of Fair Market Rent. Tenant must exercise the option by written notice delivered no earlier than 15 months and no later than 12 months before expiration. The option is unavailable if Tenant is in monetary default when notice is given or on the renewal commencement date.\n\nSection 24.1 — Notices. Notices to Landlord shall be delivered to Harbor Exchange Owner LLC, 100 Riverfront Plaza, Suite 900, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Asset Manager, with a copy to Bell & Crowe LLP, 50 North Laura Street, Suite 2400, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Real Estate Department. Notices to Tenant shall be delivered to Meridian Cartography, Inc., Suite 410, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Chief Financial Officer.\n\nFIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE\nExecuted: December 10, 2026\n\nRecitals. This First Amendment modifies the Office Lease dated September 15, 2026 between Harbor Exchange Owner LLC and Meridian Cartography, Inc. If this Amendment conflicts with the Lease, this Amendment controls.\n\nSection 1 — Premises. Effective on the Commencement Date, Suite 425 is added to the Premises. The combined Premises consist of Suites 410 and 425 and contain 21,300 rentable square feet. Tenant\'s Proportionate Share is revised to 9.37%.\n\nSection 2 — Commencement and Expiration. Section 2.1 of the Lease is deleted and replaced. The Term begins February 1, 2027 and expires January 31, 2037.\n\nSection 3 — Base Rent and Abatement. Section 3.1 is deleted and replaced. Monthly Base Rent is: February 1, 2027 through January 31, 2030: $53,250.00; February 1, 2030 through January 31, 2033: $58,575.00; February 1, 2033 through January 31, 2036: $64,432.50; and February 1, 2036 through January 31, 2037: $70,875.75. Notwithstanding Section 3.2 of the Lease, Base Rent is abated for the first four full calendar months of the Term. Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations during the abatement period.\n\nSection 4 — Security Deposit. Section 5.1 is amended so that the initial Security Deposit is $159,750.00 and, provided no Event of Default has occurred, it is reduced to $79,875.00 on February 1, 2030.\n\nSection 5 — Renewal Option. The renewal option remains one five-year option at 95% of Fair Market Rent. The exercise window is changed: notice must be delivered no earlier than 18 months and no later than 15 months before expiration. All other conditions in Section 18.2 remain unchanged.\n\nSection 6 — Ratification. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Lease remains in full force and effect.'
    }
  ],
  jsonSchema: {
    name: 'response',
    strict: true,
    schema: {
      type: 'object',
      properties: {
        title: {
          type: 'string'
        },
        summary: {
          type: 'string'
        },
        keyPoints: {
          type: 'array',
          items: {
            type: 'string'
          }
        }
      },
      required: [
        'title',
        'summary',
        'keyPoints'
      ],
      additionalProperties: false
    }
  }
})
import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "outputFormat": "JSON",
            "model": "openai:gpt@5-mini",
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "Create a controlling-term lease abstract from the original lease and amendment below. Reconcile conflicts by applying the amendment where it expressly modifies the original lease. Use only the supplied text; do not infer missing provisions or provide legal advice. Normalize dates as YYYY-MM-DD and monetary amounts as numbers without currency symbols or commas. Every extracted term must cite its source section and include a short exact quote. Return parsed JSON only, matching the supplied schema.\n\nORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE\nExecuted: September 15, 2026\n\nParties. Harbor Exchange Owner LLC (Landlord) and Meridian Cartography, Inc. (Tenant).\n\nSection 1.1 — Premises. Landlord leases to Tenant Suite 410 at Harbor Exchange, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, Florida, containing approximately 18,750 rentable square feet.\n\nSection 2.1 — Term. The Term begins January 1, 2027 and expires December 31, 2036.\n\nSection 3.1 — Base Rent. Tenant shall pay monthly Base Rent as follows: January 1, 2027 through December 31, 2029: $46,875.00; January 1, 2030 through December 31, 2032: $51,562.50; January 1, 2033 through December 31, 2035: $56,718.75; and January 1, 2036 through December 31, 2036: $62,390.63.\n\nSection 3.2 — Abatement. Base Rent is abated for the first three full calendar months of the Term. Tenant remains responsible during that period for Additional Rent and all other obligations.\n\nSection 4.1 — Operating Expenses. Beginning on the Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay Tenant's Proportionate Share of increases in Operating Expenses over the 2027 calendar-year base stop of $12.00 per rentable square foot. Tenant's Proportionate Share is 8.25%. Controllable Operating Expenses may not increase by more than 5% per calendar year on a cumulative, compounded basis. Taxes, insurance, utilities, snow removal, security costs, and costs arising from changes in law are excluded from the cap.\n\nSection 5.1 — Security Deposit. Upon execution, Tenant shall deposit $140,625.00. Provided no Event of Default has occurred, the deposit shall be reduced to $70,312.50 on January 1, 2030.\n\nSection 12.3 — Assignment and Subletting. Tenant may not assign this Lease or sublet any portion of the Premises without Landlord's prior written consent, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. No consent is required for an assignment to an Affiliate or in connection with a merger or sale of substantially all of Tenant's assets, provided the successor has a net worth at least equal to Tenant's net worth immediately before the transaction and Tenant gives Landlord at least 15 days' prior written notice.\n\nSection 18.2 — Renewal Option. Tenant has one option to renew the entire Premises for five years at 95% of Fair Market Rent. Tenant must exercise the option by written notice delivered no earlier than 15 months and no later than 12 months before expiration. The option is unavailable if Tenant is in monetary default when notice is given or on the renewal commencement date.\n\nSection 24.1 — Notices. Notices to Landlord shall be delivered to Harbor Exchange Owner LLC, 100 Riverfront Plaza, Suite 900, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Asset Manager, with a copy to Bell & Crowe LLP, 50 North Laura Street, Suite 2400, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Real Estate Department. Notices to Tenant shall be delivered to Meridian Cartography, Inc., Suite 410, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Chief Financial Officer.\n\nFIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE\nExecuted: December 10, 2026\n\nRecitals. This First Amendment modifies the Office Lease dated September 15, 2026 between Harbor Exchange Owner LLC and Meridian Cartography, Inc. If this Amendment conflicts with the Lease, this Amendment controls.\n\nSection 1 — Premises. Effective on the Commencement Date, Suite 425 is added to the Premises. The combined Premises consist of Suites 410 and 425 and contain 21,300 rentable square feet. Tenant's Proportionate Share is revised to 9.37%.\n\nSection 2 — Commencement and Expiration. Section 2.1 of the Lease is deleted and replaced. The Term begins February 1, 2027 and expires January 31, 2037.\n\nSection 3 — Base Rent and Abatement. Section 3.1 is deleted and replaced. Monthly Base Rent is: February 1, 2027 through January 31, 2030: $53,250.00; February 1, 2030 through January 31, 2033: $58,575.00; February 1, 2033 through January 31, 2036: $64,432.50; and February 1, 2036 through January 31, 2037: $70,875.75. Notwithstanding Section 3.2 of the Lease, Base Rent is abated for the first four full calendar months of the Term. Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations during the abatement period.\n\nSection 4 — Security Deposit. Section 5.1 is amended so that the initial Security Deposit is $159,750.00 and, provided no Event of Default has occurred, it is reduced to $79,875.00 on February 1, 2030.\n\nSection 5 — Renewal Option. The renewal option remains one five-year option at 95% of Fair Market Rent. The exercise window is changed: notice must be delivered no earlier than 18 months and no later than 15 months before expiration. All other conditions in Section 18.2 remain unchanged.\n\nSection 6 — Ratification. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Lease remains in full force and effect."
                }
            ],
            "jsonSchema": {
                "name": "response",
                "strict": True,
                "schema": {
                    "type": "object",
                    "properties": {
                        "title": {
                            "type": "string"
                        },
                        "summary": {
                            "type": "string"
                        },
                        "keyPoints": {
                            "type": "array",
                            "items": {
                                "type": "string"
                            }
                        }
                    },
                    "required": [
                        "title",
                        "summary",
                        "keyPoints"
                    ],
                    "additionalProperties": False
                }
            }
        })


asyncio.run(main())
curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "c1a49175-a584-4c45-a6dc-357f4ea11726",
      "outputFormat": "JSON",
      "model": "openai:gpt@5-mini",
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "Create a controlling-term lease abstract from the original lease and amendment below. Reconcile conflicts by applying the amendment where it expressly modifies the original lease. Use only the supplied text; do not infer missing provisions or provide legal advice. Normalize dates as YYYY-MM-DD and monetary amounts as numbers without currency symbols or commas. Every extracted term must cite its source section and include a short exact quote. Return parsed JSON only, matching the supplied schema.\n\nORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE\nExecuted: September 15, 2026\n\nParties. Harbor Exchange Owner LLC (Landlord) and Meridian Cartography, Inc. (Tenant).\n\nSection 1.1 — Premises. Landlord leases to Tenant Suite 410 at Harbor Exchange, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, Florida, containing approximately 18,750 rentable square feet.\n\nSection 2.1 — Term. The Term begins January 1, 2027 and expires December 31, 2036.\n\nSection 3.1 — Base Rent. Tenant shall pay monthly Base Rent as follows: January 1, 2027 through December 31, 2029: $46,875.00; January 1, 2030 through December 31, 2032: $51,562.50; January 1, 2033 through December 31, 2035: $56,718.75; and January 1, 2036 through December 31, 2036: $62,390.63.\n\nSection 3.2 — Abatement. Base Rent is abated for the first three full calendar months of the Term. Tenant remains responsible during that period for Additional Rent and all other obligations.\n\nSection 4.1 — Operating Expenses. Beginning on the Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay Tenant's Proportionate Share of increases in Operating Expenses over the 2027 calendar-year base stop of $12.00 per rentable square foot. Tenant's Proportionate Share is 8.25%. Controllable Operating Expenses may not increase by more than 5% per calendar year on a cumulative, compounded basis. Taxes, insurance, utilities, snow removal, security costs, and costs arising from changes in law are excluded from the cap.\n\nSection 5.1 — Security Deposit. Upon execution, Tenant shall deposit $140,625.00. Provided no Event of Default has occurred, the deposit shall be reduced to $70,312.50 on January 1, 2030.\n\nSection 12.3 — Assignment and Subletting. Tenant may not assign this Lease or sublet any portion of the Premises without Landlord's prior written consent, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. No consent is required for an assignment to an Affiliate or in connection with a merger or sale of substantially all of Tenant's assets, provided the successor has a net worth at least equal to Tenant's net worth immediately before the transaction and Tenant gives Landlord at least 15 days' prior written notice.\n\nSection 18.2 — Renewal Option. Tenant has one option to renew the entire Premises for five years at 95% of Fair Market Rent. Tenant must exercise the option by written notice delivered no earlier than 15 months and no later than 12 months before expiration. The option is unavailable if Tenant is in monetary default when notice is given or on the renewal commencement date.\n\nSection 24.1 — Notices. Notices to Landlord shall be delivered to Harbor Exchange Owner LLC, 100 Riverfront Plaza, Suite 900, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Asset Manager, with a copy to Bell & Crowe LLP, 50 North Laura Street, Suite 2400, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Real Estate Department. Notices to Tenant shall be delivered to Meridian Cartography, Inc., Suite 410, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Chief Financial Officer.\n\nFIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE\nExecuted: December 10, 2026\n\nRecitals. This First Amendment modifies the Office Lease dated September 15, 2026 between Harbor Exchange Owner LLC and Meridian Cartography, Inc. If this Amendment conflicts with the Lease, this Amendment controls.\n\nSection 1 — Premises. Effective on the Commencement Date, Suite 425 is added to the Premises. The combined Premises consist of Suites 410 and 425 and contain 21,300 rentable square feet. Tenant's Proportionate Share is revised to 9.37%.\n\nSection 2 — Commencement and Expiration. Section 2.1 of the Lease is deleted and replaced. The Term begins February 1, 2027 and expires January 31, 2037.\n\nSection 3 — Base Rent and Abatement. Section 3.1 is deleted and replaced. Monthly Base Rent is: February 1, 2027 through January 31, 2030: $53,250.00; February 1, 2030 through January 31, 2033: $58,575.00; February 1, 2033 through January 31, 2036: $64,432.50; and February 1, 2036 through January 31, 2037: $70,875.75. Notwithstanding Section 3.2 of the Lease, Base Rent is abated for the first four full calendar months of the Term. Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations during the abatement period.\n\nSection 4 — Security Deposit. Section 5.1 is amended so that the initial Security Deposit is $159,750.00 and, provided no Event of Default has occurred, it is reduced to $79,875.00 on February 1, 2030.\n\nSection 5 — Renewal Option. The renewal option remains one five-year option at 95% of Fair Market Rent. The exercise window is changed: notice must be delivered no earlier than 18 months and no later than 15 months before expiration. All other conditions in Section 18.2 remain unchanged.\n\nSection 6 — Ratification. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Lease remains in full force and effect."
        }
      ],
      "jsonSchema": {
        "name": "response",
        "strict": true,
        "schema": {
          "type": "object",
          "properties": {
            "title": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "summary": {
              "type": "string"
            },
            "keyPoints": {
              "type": "array",
              "items": {
                "type": "string"
              }
            }
          },
          "required": [
            "title",
            "summary",
            "keyPoints"
          ],
          "additionalProperties": false
        }
      }
    }
  ]'
runware run openai:gpt@5-mini \
  outputFormat=JSON \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="Create a controlling-term lease abstract from the original lease and amendment below. Reconcile conflicts by applying the amendment where it expressly modifies the original lease. Use only the supplied text; do not infer missing provisions or provide legal advice. Normalize dates as YYYY-MM-DD and monetary amounts as numbers without currency symbols or commas. Every extracted term must cite its source section and include a short exact quote. Return parsed JSON only, matching the supplied schema.

ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE
Executed: September 15, 2026

Parties. Harbor Exchange Owner LLC (Landlord) and Meridian Cartography, Inc. (Tenant).

Section 1.1 — Premises. Landlord leases to Tenant Suite 410 at Harbor Exchange, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, Florida, containing approximately 18,750 rentable square feet.

Section 2.1 — Term. The Term begins January 1, 2027 and expires December 31, 2036.

Section 3.1 — Base Rent. Tenant shall pay monthly Base Rent as follows: January 1, 2027 through December 31, 2029: \$46,875.00; January 1, 2030 through December 31, 2032: \$51,562.50; January 1, 2033 through December 31, 2035: \$56,718.75; and January 1, 2036 through December 31, 2036: \$62,390.63.

Section 3.2 — Abatement. Base Rent is abated for the first three full calendar months of the Term. Tenant remains responsible during that period for Additional Rent and all other obligations.

Section 4.1 — Operating Expenses. Beginning on the Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay Tenant's Proportionate Share of increases in Operating Expenses over the 2027 calendar-year base stop of \$12.00 per rentable square foot. Tenant's Proportionate Share is 8.25%. Controllable Operating Expenses may not increase by more than 5% per calendar year on a cumulative, compounded basis. Taxes, insurance, utilities, snow removal, security costs, and costs arising from changes in law are excluded from the cap.

Section 5.1 — Security Deposit. Upon execution, Tenant shall deposit \$140,625.00. Provided no Event of Default has occurred, the deposit shall be reduced to \$70,312.50 on January 1, 2030.

Section 12.3 — Assignment and Subletting. Tenant may not assign this Lease or sublet any portion of the Premises without Landlord's prior written consent, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. No consent is required for an assignment to an Affiliate or in connection with a merger or sale of substantially all of Tenant's assets, provided the successor has a net worth at least equal to Tenant's net worth immediately before the transaction and Tenant gives Landlord at least 15 days' prior written notice.

Section 18.2 — Renewal Option. Tenant has one option to renew the entire Premises for five years at 95% of Fair Market Rent. Tenant must exercise the option by written notice delivered no earlier than 15 months and no later than 12 months before expiration. The option is unavailable if Tenant is in monetary default when notice is given or on the renewal commencement date.

Section 24.1 — Notices. Notices to Landlord shall be delivered to Harbor Exchange Owner LLC, 100 Riverfront Plaza, Suite 900, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Asset Manager, with a copy to Bell & Crowe LLP, 50 North Laura Street, Suite 2400, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Real Estate Department. Notices to Tenant shall be delivered to Meridian Cartography, Inc., Suite 410, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Chief Financial Officer.

FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE
Executed: December 10, 2026

Recitals. This First Amendment modifies the Office Lease dated September 15, 2026 between Harbor Exchange Owner LLC and Meridian Cartography, Inc. If this Amendment conflicts with the Lease, this Amendment controls.

Section 1 — Premises. Effective on the Commencement Date, Suite 425 is added to the Premises. The combined Premises consist of Suites 410 and 425 and contain 21,300 rentable square feet. Tenant's Proportionate Share is revised to 9.37%.

Section 2 — Commencement and Expiration. Section 2.1 of the Lease is deleted and replaced. The Term begins February 1, 2027 and expires January 31, 2037.

Section 3 — Base Rent and Abatement. Section 3.1 is deleted and replaced. Monthly Base Rent is: February 1, 2027 through January 31, 2030: \$53,250.00; February 1, 2030 through January 31, 2033: \$58,575.00; February 1, 2033 through January 31, 2036: \$64,432.50; and February 1, 2036 through January 31, 2037: \$70,875.75. Notwithstanding Section 3.2 of the Lease, Base Rent is abated for the first four full calendar months of the Term. Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations during the abatement period.

Section 4 — Security Deposit. Section 5.1 is amended so that the initial Security Deposit is \$159,750.00 and, provided no Event of Default has occurred, it is reduced to \$79,875.00 on February 1, 2030.

Section 5 — Renewal Option. The renewal option remains one five-year option at 95% of Fair Market Rent. The exercise window is changed: notice must be delivered no earlier than 18 months and no later than 15 months before expiration. All other conditions in Section 18.2 remain unchanged.

Section 6 — Ratification. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Lease remains in full force and effect." \
  jsonSchema.name=response \
  jsonSchema.strict=true \
  jsonSchema.schema.type=object \
  jsonSchema.schema.properties.title.type=string \
  jsonSchema.schema.properties.summary.type=string \
  jsonSchema.schema.properties.keyPoints.type=array \
  jsonSchema.schema.properties.keyPoints.items.type=string \
  jsonSchema.schema.required.0=title \
  jsonSchema.schema.required.1=summary \
  jsonSchema.schema.required.2=keyPoints \
  jsonSchema.schema.additionalProperties=false
{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "c1a49175-a584-4c45-a6dc-357f4ea11726",
  "outputFormat": "JSON",
  "model": "openai:gpt@5-mini",
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "Create a controlling-term lease abstract from the original lease and amendment below. Reconcile conflicts by applying the amendment where it expressly modifies the original lease. Use only the supplied text; do not infer missing provisions or provide legal advice. Normalize dates as YYYY-MM-DD and monetary amounts as numbers without currency symbols or commas. Every extracted term must cite its source section and include a short exact quote. Return parsed JSON only, matching the supplied schema.\n\nORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE\nExecuted: September 15, 2026\n\nParties. Harbor Exchange Owner LLC (Landlord) and Meridian Cartography, Inc. (Tenant).\n\nSection 1.1 — Premises. Landlord leases to Tenant Suite 410 at Harbor Exchange, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, Florida, containing approximately 18,750 rentable square feet.\n\nSection 2.1 — Term. The Term begins January 1, 2027 and expires December 31, 2036.\n\nSection 3.1 — Base Rent. Tenant shall pay monthly Base Rent as follows: January 1, 2027 through December 31, 2029: $46,875.00; January 1, 2030 through December 31, 2032: $51,562.50; January 1, 2033 through December 31, 2035: $56,718.75; and January 1, 2036 through December 31, 2036: $62,390.63.\n\nSection 3.2 — Abatement. Base Rent is abated for the first three full calendar months of the Term. Tenant remains responsible during that period for Additional Rent and all other obligations.\n\nSection 4.1 — Operating Expenses. Beginning on the Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay Tenant's Proportionate Share of increases in Operating Expenses over the 2027 calendar-year base stop of $12.00 per rentable square foot. Tenant's Proportionate Share is 8.25%. Controllable Operating Expenses may not increase by more than 5% per calendar year on a cumulative, compounded basis. Taxes, insurance, utilities, snow removal, security costs, and costs arising from changes in law are excluded from the cap.\n\nSection 5.1 — Security Deposit. Upon execution, Tenant shall deposit $140,625.00. Provided no Event of Default has occurred, the deposit shall be reduced to $70,312.50 on January 1, 2030.\n\nSection 12.3 — Assignment and Subletting. Tenant may not assign this Lease or sublet any portion of the Premises without Landlord's prior written consent, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. No consent is required for an assignment to an Affiliate or in connection with a merger or sale of substantially all of Tenant's assets, provided the successor has a net worth at least equal to Tenant's net worth immediately before the transaction and Tenant gives Landlord at least 15 days' prior written notice.\n\nSection 18.2 — Renewal Option. Tenant has one option to renew the entire Premises for five years at 95% of Fair Market Rent. Tenant must exercise the option by written notice delivered no earlier than 15 months and no later than 12 months before expiration. The option is unavailable if Tenant is in monetary default when notice is given or on the renewal commencement date.\n\nSection 24.1 — Notices. Notices to Landlord shall be delivered to Harbor Exchange Owner LLC, 100 Riverfront Plaza, Suite 900, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Asset Manager, with a copy to Bell & Crowe LLP, 50 North Laura Street, Suite 2400, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Real Estate Department. Notices to Tenant shall be delivered to Meridian Cartography, Inc., Suite 410, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Chief Financial Officer.\n\nFIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE\nExecuted: December 10, 2026\n\nRecitals. This First Amendment modifies the Office Lease dated September 15, 2026 between Harbor Exchange Owner LLC and Meridian Cartography, Inc. If this Amendment conflicts with the Lease, this Amendment controls.\n\nSection 1 — Premises. Effective on the Commencement Date, Suite 425 is added to the Premises. The combined Premises consist of Suites 410 and 425 and contain 21,300 rentable square feet. Tenant's Proportionate Share is revised to 9.37%.\n\nSection 2 — Commencement and Expiration. Section 2.1 of the Lease is deleted and replaced. The Term begins February 1, 2027 and expires January 31, 2037.\n\nSection 3 — Base Rent and Abatement. Section 3.1 is deleted and replaced. Monthly Base Rent is: February 1, 2027 through January 31, 2030: $53,250.00; February 1, 2030 through January 31, 2033: $58,575.00; February 1, 2033 through January 31, 2036: $64,432.50; and February 1, 2036 through January 31, 2037: $70,875.75. Notwithstanding Section 3.2 of the Lease, Base Rent is abated for the first four full calendar months of the Term. Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations during the abatement period.\n\nSection 4 — Security Deposit. Section 5.1 is amended so that the initial Security Deposit is $159,750.00 and, provided no Event of Default has occurred, it is reduced to $79,875.00 on February 1, 2030.\n\nSection 5 — Renewal Option. The renewal option remains one five-year option at 95% of Fair Market Rent. The exercise window is changed: notice must be delivered no earlier than 18 months and no later than 15 months before expiration. All other conditions in Section 18.2 remain unchanged.\n\nSection 6 — Ratification. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Lease remains in full force and effect."
    }
  ],
  "jsonSchema": {
    "name": "response",
    "strict": true,
    "schema": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "title": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "summary": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "keyPoints": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "type": "string"
          }
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "title",
        "summary",
        "keyPoints"
      ],
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
  }
}
Response
{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "c1a49175-a584-4c45-a6dc-357f4ea11726",
  "text": "{\"title\":\"Controlling-Term Lease Abstract\",\"summary\":\"This abstract reflects the ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE executed 2026-09-15 as modified by the FIRST AMENDMENT executed 2026-12-10. Where the Amendment expressly modifies the Lease, the Amendment controls. All dates are normalized to YYYY-MM-DD and monetary amounts are shown as numbers without currency symbols or commas. Quotes cite the source section and reproduce short exact excerpts from the supplied texts.\",\"keyPoints\":[ \"Original Lease Execution Date — 2026-09-15. Source: ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE header. Exact quote: \\\"Executed: September 15, 2026\\\" (Original Office Lease).\", \"First Amendment Execution Date — 2026-12-10. Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE header. Exact quote: \\\"Executed: December 10, 2026\\\" (First Amendment).\", \"Parties — Landlord: Harbor Exchange Owner LLC; Tenant: Meridian Cartography, Inc. Source: ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE, 'Parties.' Exact quote: \\\"Harbor Exchange Owner LLC (Landlord) and Meridian Cartography, Inc. (Tenant).\\\" (Section labeled 'Parties').\", \"Premises — Suites and Rentable Area (amended): Suites 410 and 425; 21300 rentable square feet. Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 1 — 'Premises.' Exact quote: \\\"Effective on the Commencement Date, Suite 425 is added to the Premises. The combined Premises consist of Suites 410 and 425 and contain 21,300 rentable square feet.\\\" (Section 1).\", \"Tenant's Proportionate Share — 9.37% (amended). Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 1 — 'Premises.' Exact quote: \\\"Tenant's Proportionate Share is revised to 9.37%.\\\" (Section 1).\", \"Term — Commencement and Expiration (amended): Term begins 2027-02-01 and expires 2037-01-31. Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 2 — 'Commencement and Expiration.' Exact quote: \\\"The Term begins February 1, 2027 and expires January 31, 2037.\\\" (Section 2).\", \"Base Rent — Monthly schedule (amended): 2027-02-01 to 2030-01-31: 53250.00; 2030-02-01 to 2033-01-31: 58575.00; 2033-02-01 to 2036-01-31: 64432.50; 2036-02-01 to 2037-01-31: 70875.75. Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 3 — 'Base Rent and Abatement.' Exact quote: \\\"Monthly Base Rent is: February 1, 2027 through January 31, 2030: $53,250.00; February 1, 2030 through January 31, 2033: $58,575.00; February 1, 2033 through January 31, 2036: $64,432.50; and February 1, 2036 through January 31, 2037: $70,875.75.\\\" (Section 3).\", \"Base Rent Abatement — First four full calendar months of the Term (amended). Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations during abatement. Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 3 — 'Base Rent and Abatement.' Exact quote: \\\"Notwithstanding Section 3.2 of the Lease, Base Rent is abated for the first four full calendar months of the Term. Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations during the abatement period.\\\" (Section 3).\", \"Operating Expenses — Base stop, cap, exclusions (original, proportionate share amended): Beginning on the Commencement Date Tenant shall pay Tenant's Proportionate Share of increases in Operating Expenses over the 2027 calendar-year base stop of $12.00 per rentable square foot; Controllable Operating Expenses cap 5% per calendar year cumulative compounded; exclusions listed. Tenant's Proportionate Share is 9.37% per Amendment. Sources and exact quotes: ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE, Section 4.1 — \\\"Beginning on the Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay Tenant's Proportionate Share of increases in Operating Expenses over the 2027 calendar-year base stop of $12.00 per rentable square foot. ... Controllable Operating Expenses may not increase by more than 5% per calendar year on a cumulative, compounded basis. Taxes, insurance, utilities, snow removal, security costs, and costs arising from changes in law are excluded from the cap.\\\" (Section 4.1); FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 1 — \\\"Tenant's Proportionate Share is revised to 9.37%.\\\" (Section 1).\", \"Security Deposit — Initial and reduction (amended): initial 159750.00 due upon execution; reduced to 79875.00 on 2030-02-01 provided no Event of Default. Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 4 — 'Security Deposit.' Exact quote: \\\"Section 5.1 is amended so that the initial Security Deposit is $159,750.00 and, provided no Event of Default has occurred, it is reduced to $79,875.00 on February 1, 2030.\\\" (Section 4).\", \"Assignment and Subletting — Landlord consent required except for Affiliate/merger/sale as provided (original). Source: ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE, Section 12.3 — 'Assignment and Subletting.' Exact quote: \\\"Tenant may not assign this Lease or sublet any portion of the Premises without Landlord's prior written consent, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. No consent is required for an assignment to an Affiliate or in connection with a merger or sale of substantially all of Tenant's assets, provided the successor has a net worth at least equal to Tenant's net worth immediately before the transaction and Tenant gives Landlord at least 15 days' prior written notice.\\\" (Section 12.3).\", \"Renewal Option — One five-year option at 95% of Fair Market Rent; exercise window amended to notice delivery no earlier than 18 months and no later than 15 months before expiration; other conditions in Section 18.2 remain unchanged. Sources and exact quotes: ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE, Section 18.2 — \\\"Tenant has one option to renew the entire Premises for five years at 95% of Fair Market Rent. Tenant must exercise the option by written notice delivered no earlier than 15 months and no later than 12 months before expiration. The option is unavailable if Tenant is in monetary default when notice is given or on the renewal commencement date.\\\" (Section 18.2); FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 5 — \\\"The renewal option remains one five-year option at 95% of Fair Market Rent. The exercise window is changed: notice must be delivered no earlier than 18 months and no later than 15 months before expiration. All other conditions in Section 18.2 remain unchanged.\\\" (Section 5).\", \"Notices — Addresses and attention lines (original): Notices to Landlord to Harbor Exchange Owner LLC, 100 Riverfront Plaza, Suite 900, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Asset Manager, with a copy to Bell & Crowe LLP, 50 North Laura Street, Suite 2400, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Real Estate Department. Notices to Tenant to Meridian Cartography, Inc., Suite 410, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Chief Financial Officer. Source: ORIGINAL OFFICE LEASE, Section 24.1 — 'Notices.' Exact quote: \\\"Notices to Landlord shall be delivered to Harbor Exchange Owner LLC, 100 Riverfront Plaza, Suite 900, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Asset Manager, with a copy to Bell & Crowe LLP, 50 North Laura Street, Suite 2400, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Real Estate Department. Notices to Tenant shall be delivered to Meridian Cartography, Inc., Suite 410, 225 West Bay Street, Jacksonville, FL 32202, Attention: Chief Financial Officer.\\\" (Section 24.1).\", \"Abatement responsibility during abatement — Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations (amended). Source: FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE, Section 3 — 'Base Rent and Abatement.' Exact quote: \\\"Tenant remains responsible for Additional Rent and all other obligations during the abatement period.\\\" (Section 3).\"]}",
  "cost": 0.008302,
  "finishReason": "stop"
}

tool-calling

Pharma Cargo Cutoff Decision$0.000366~3s
{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "b81923e3-6a79-48fb-9fbe-6826fc5687b2",
  "cost": 0.000366,
  "finishReason": "tools",
  "tools": [
    {
      "id": "call_q7gctdUahI6DmzXAW14LOE0r",
      "name": "get_current_utc_time"
    }
  ]
}
Finish reason: tools
Try in Playground
import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  model: 'openai:gpt@5-mini',
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'Prepare an operations go/no-go brief for a temperature-controlled pharmaceutical shipment departing Frankfurt Airport today. The carrier\'s document desk closes at 18:00 Europe/Berlin, physical tender closes at 19:15 Europe/Berlin, and the validated truck is 85 minutes from the terminal. Before making any calculations or recommendation, use the available function to obtain the current UTC date and time. Do not estimate or invent the time. After the function result is returned, report the corresponding Frankfurt local time, minutes remaining to each cutoff, latest safe truck-departure time with a 20-minute terminal-entry buffer, and a concise GO, AT RISK, or NO-GO recommendation.'
    }
  ],
  tools: [
    {
      type: 'function',
      name: 'get_current_utc_time',
      description: 'Returns the current date and time in UTC.',
      schema: {}
    }
  ],
  toolChoice: {
    type: 'any',
    name: 'get_current_utc_time'
  }
})
import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "model": "openai:gpt@5-mini",
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "Prepare an operations go/no-go brief for a temperature-controlled pharmaceutical shipment departing Frankfurt Airport today. The carrier's document desk closes at 18:00 Europe/Berlin, physical tender closes at 19:15 Europe/Berlin, and the validated truck is 85 minutes from the terminal. Before making any calculations or recommendation, use the available function to obtain the current UTC date and time. Do not estimate or invent the time. After the function result is returned, report the corresponding Frankfurt local time, minutes remaining to each cutoff, latest safe truck-departure time with a 20-minute terminal-entry buffer, and a concise GO, AT RISK, or NO-GO recommendation."
                }
            ],
            "tools": [
                {
                    "type": "function",
                    "name": "get_current_utc_time",
                    "description": "Returns the current date and time in UTC.",
                    "schema": {}
                }
            ],
            "toolChoice": {
                "type": "any",
                "name": "get_current_utc_time"
            }
        })


asyncio.run(main())
curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "b81923e3-6a79-48fb-9fbe-6826fc5687b2",
      "model": "openai:gpt@5-mini",
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "Prepare an operations go/no-go brief for a temperature-controlled pharmaceutical shipment departing Frankfurt Airport today. The carrier's document desk closes at 18:00 Europe/Berlin, physical tender closes at 19:15 Europe/Berlin, and the validated truck is 85 minutes from the terminal. Before making any calculations or recommendation, use the available function to obtain the current UTC date and time. Do not estimate or invent the time. After the function result is returned, report the corresponding Frankfurt local time, minutes remaining to each cutoff, latest safe truck-departure time with a 20-minute terminal-entry buffer, and a concise GO, AT RISK, or NO-GO recommendation."
        }
      ],
      "tools": [
        {
          "type": "function",
          "name": "get_current_utc_time",
          "description": "Returns the current date and time in UTC.",
          "schema": {}
        }
      ],
      "toolChoice": {
        "type": "any",
        "name": "get_current_utc_time"
      }
    }
  ]'
runware run openai:gpt@5-mini \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="Prepare an operations go/no-go brief for a temperature-controlled pharmaceutical shipment departing Frankfurt Airport today. The carrier's document desk closes at 18:00 Europe/Berlin, physical tender closes at 19:15 Europe/Berlin, and the validated truck is 85 minutes from the terminal. Before making any calculations or recommendation, use the available function to obtain the current UTC date and time. Do not estimate or invent the time. After the function result is returned, report the corresponding Frankfurt local time, minutes remaining to each cutoff, latest safe truck-departure time with a 20-minute terminal-entry buffer, and a concise GO, AT RISK, or NO-GO recommendation." \
  tools.0.type=function \
  tools.0.name=get_current_utc_time \
  tools.0.description="Returns the current date and time in UTC." \
  toolChoice.type=any \
  toolChoice.name=get_current_utc_time
{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "b81923e3-6a79-48fb-9fbe-6826fc5687b2",
  "model": "openai:gpt@5-mini",
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "Prepare an operations go/no-go brief for a temperature-controlled pharmaceutical shipment departing Frankfurt Airport today. The carrier's document desk closes at 18:00 Europe/Berlin, physical tender closes at 19:15 Europe/Berlin, and the validated truck is 85 minutes from the terminal. Before making any calculations or recommendation, use the available function to obtain the current UTC date and time. Do not estimate or invent the time. After the function result is returned, report the corresponding Frankfurt local time, minutes remaining to each cutoff, latest safe truck-departure time with a 20-minute terminal-entry buffer, and a concise GO, AT RISK, or NO-GO recommendation."
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "type": "function",
      "name": "get_current_utc_time",
      "description": "Returns the current date and time in UTC.",
      "schema": {}
    }
  ],
  "toolChoice": {
    "type": "any",
    "name": "get_current_utc_time"
  }
}
Response
{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "b81923e3-6a79-48fb-9fbe-6826fc5687b2",
  "cost": 0.000366,
  "finishReason": "tools",
  "tools": [
    {
      "id": "call_q7gctdUahI6DmzXAW14LOE0r",
      "name": "get_current_utc_time"
    }
  ]
}

text-generation

Documentary Distribution Deal Memo$0.0135~1m 35s
TO: Producing Team, TIDELINE
FROM: [Senior Distribution Advisor]
RE: Distribution decision and immediate liquidity analysis — recommendation, Sept 30 cash test, comparative analysis, negotiation plan, and decision conditions

Date: Immediate

Executive recommendation (top-line)
- Preferred offer: Accept Offer B (Harbor Documentaries) subject to negotiated changes (see negotiation plan). Rationale: it best protects the film’s credibility and community relationships (Producer Objective #1) while preserving key rights needed to execute Objective #3–#6. It also delivers a firm near-term cash payment that can be combined with short-term bridge strategies to meet the September 30 obligations.
- Accept as written only if the negotiated changes below are refused and the producers judge the residual cash plan workable (see fallback cash measures). But do not accept Offer C (Vista) because its editorial/marketing control and community restrictions directly conflict with the top priority (credibility/relationships). Offer A (Northlight) is the secondary fallback if Harbor cannot be improved to meet our top negotiation priorities; Northlight gives more immediate cash than Harbor but imposes limits on community access and permits edits that risk participant framing.
- Best fallback: Offer A (Northlight) — accept only if Harbor cannot (a) increase advance to materially reduce the Sept 30 gap, or (b) amend SVOD negotiation/marketing and community-screening protections. Vista should be rejected unless the director and community are willing to accept significant editorial and access compromises despite immediate solvency relief.

Section 2 — September 30 liquidity test (facts and arithmetic)
Facts (contractual timing items given)
- Bridge loan due Sept 30: $420,000 (includes interest/fees).
- Deferred crew compensation due Sept 30: $40,000.
- Sales agent commission: 10% of any license fee, minimum guarantee, or advance, deducted when each payment is received.
- Producers currently have no unrestricted cash.

We show gross cash to the producer by Sept 30, the sales-agent commission on payments received, net cash to producer, and resulting funding gap versus $460,000 obligations. We separate committed payments (firm, with contractual timing that can occur before Sept 30) from uncertain/expected payments.

Liquidity table (committed vs. realistic/likely scenarios)

- Offer A — Northlight (US/Canada all-media MG $550,000; 50% on signing, 50% on delivery acceptance)
  - Committed by Sept 30 (realistic signing by Aug 20): 50% on signing = $275,000 (signing can occur by Aug 20).
    - Sales agent commission (10% when payment received): $27,500.
    - Net to producer: $247,500.
    - Funding gap: $460,000 - $247,500 = $212,500 shortfall.
  - Uncertain by Sept 30: second 50% ($275,000) — Northlight may take up to 60 days after delivery to accept; if acceptance occurs before Sept 30 cash would increase by $247,500 net (after commission), eliminating the gap and leaving surplus. But this second tranche is not contractually guaranteed before Sept 30.

- Offer B — Harbor (US theatrical & TVOD exclusives; $250,000 advance payable within 10 business days after signing)
  - Committed by Sept 30 (Harbor can sign by Aug 15): $250,000 advance within ~10 business days.
    - Sales agent commission (10%): $25,000.
    - Net to producer: $225,000.
    - Funding gap: $460,000 - $225,000 = $235,000 shortfall.
  - Uncertain by Sept 30: additional licenses (public-television, educational, Canada) remain available to monetize but are expressions of interest only and not committed.

- Offer C — Vista (worldwide SVOD/AVOD/TV/educational; $1,200,000: $800k on delivery acceptance, $400k on platform launch)
  - Conservative (no payment before Sept 30): $0 received → funding gap = $460,000.
  - Reasonable/likely scenario (Vista expects delivery acceptance within 15 business days): $800,000 received by Sept 30.
    - Sales agent commission (10%): $80,000.
    - Net to producer: $720,000.
    - Surplus over obligations: $720,000 - $460,000 = $260,000 surplus.
  - Note: the $800k timing is an expectation in Offer C, not an unconditional, irrevocable guarantee in the wording we have. The second $400k is tied to platform launch (Jan–Mar window, no fixed date).

Immediate practical implication
- Only Vista clearly offers the potential to solve the Sept 30 cash need by itself (in the reasonable/likely timing scenario). Harbor and Northlight leave six-figure shortfalls that must be closed via (a) escalation of the advance, (b) lender extension(s) up to $150k (not committed), (c) immediate licensing of remaining rights (public TV, educational, Canada), or (d) combination of the above.

Section 3 — Comparative analysis (economics, rights, control, access, and execution risk)
We evaluate offers against the producer objectives in priority order and flag where headline dollars are misleading.

1) Credibility and community relationships (Objective #1)
- Harbor (B): Strongest protection. No editorial changes without producer approval; mutual approval over key art/trailer; expressly reserves producer free community screenings (up to 100 attendees). This aligns with the director’s sensitivity to participant portrayal and preserves community access for grassroots screenings.
- Northlight (A): Risky. Consultation only on trailer/key art; Northlight may request edits and only requires producer approval for cumulative edits exceeding three minutes — that permits multiple small edits that could change emphasis/meaning. Also Centralizes community screenings at non-theatrical rates, which may restrict affordable access and direct community organizing.
- Vista (C): Highest risk to credibility. Controls creative packaging (key art, trailer, title, publicity) after consultation; may create an 8-minute shorter platform version without producer approval unless it materially changes participant meaning. Limits producer-organized free screenings (25/year subject to approvals) and no educational pricing provided. Vista’s worldwide exclusivity for many rights curtails the producer’s ability to control community and educational distribution.

2) Near-term cash (Objective #2)
- Vista offers the largest headline cash and the only single-deal solution to Sept 30 in the likely-timing scenario. But timing is an expectation and editorial/access compromises are substantial.
- Northlight offers more immediate cash than Harbor (275k vs 250k) on signing; still leaves a six-figure gap.
- Harbor’s $250k is firm and payable quickly if we sign by Aug 15; it is competitive, but insufficient alone.

Why headline dollars can be misleading
- Vista’s $1.2M looks dominant but trades away long-term rights, editorial control, community access, and education—contrary to Objective #1 and #4. Also, Vista offers no backend share.
- Northlight’s $550k MG is attractive, but P&A recoupable + capped expenses and distributor fees will reduce net and their control over community screenings will limit grassroots reach.
- Harbor’s smaller advance leaves upside (SVOD, AVOD, TV deals, international) available to the producer, preserving multiple monetization pathways and credibility, which supports Objectives #3–#6 in aggregate.

3) Rights retained and long-term economics (Objectives #3, #4, #6)
- Harbor retains SVOD/AVOD/TV/educational/international/Canada — largest remaining optionality to monetize later. This preserves long-term economics without speculative dependence on any single platform.
- Northlight takes all US/Canada media for 12 years (broad) but offers backend participation; producers will have to rely on Northlight’s recoupment accounting and P&A spend. Community access will be mediated by Northlight’s non-theatrical rates.
- Vista takes worldwide rights (many categories) for 15 years with no backend — immediate money at the cost of long-term receipts and control.

4) Editorial and marketing control (Objective #5)
- Harbor: best protections (mutual approval and prohibition on editorial changes without producer consent).
- Northlight: limited consultation and ability to request edits up to 3 minutes without approval—this is a practical vulnerability.
- Vista: significant control over key art, trailer, and permissible edits (8 minutes) with limited approval; unacceptable given director sensitivity.

5) Community and educational access (Objective #4)
- Harbor explicitly reserves free community screenings (up to 100 attendees) — strongest community access.
- Northlight routes community screenings through their rates — reduces producer flexibility and likely increases cost to communities.
- Vista severely restricts community screenings (25/year and approval required) and offers no stated educational pricing.

6) Term, territory, and execution risk
- Harbor: 7-year US term limited to theatrical/TVOD; lower risk for long-term rights erosion; allows pursuing public-television and educational deals immediately.
- Northlight: 12-year US/Canada all-media — longer lockup and higher execution risk if P&A or release strategy is misaligned.
- Vista: 15-year worldwide — long lockup that prevents other deals and risks over-reliance on platform placement.

Waterfall and ambiguous language to flag
- Harbor’s waterfall language appears straightforward but we must confirm the precise ordering of recoupment (advance, expenses, P&A) and definition of “gross receipts” and allowable recoupable deductions.
- Northlight’s treatment of P&A as recoupable (but P&A also guaranteed $350k) and the $175k expense cap interaction need precise wording review.
- Vista contains broad sublicensing and editorial control/cut permissions that require careful clause review.

Section 4 — Negotiation plan (five highest-priority changes to request from Harbor, in order)
Goal: preserve credibility/relationships while securing sufficient near-term liquidity and protecting future optionality.

1) Increase the immediate advance to cover Sept 30 obligations (highest priority)
- Requested term: Raise the advance from $250,000 to $520,000, payable within 10 business days of signing. (Reason: producer needs net ≥ $460,000 after agent commission; 10% commission requires gross ≈ $511,111; ask round figure $520k.)
- Business rationale: This secures immediate obligations, avoids disruptive lender actions or rushed concessions, and enables a confident rollout with the director and community; it is a share-of-risk request given Harbor’s planned theatrical P&A and alignment with marketing.
- Realistic fallback: $350,000 advance now, plus $100,000 guaranteed on delivery acceptance (or within 30 days of public theatrical opening). If Harbor refuses, request a cash bridge co-funded by Harbor (e.g., Harbor-funded short-term loan/reimbursement) for $150k.

2) Preserve and expand community and educational rights
- Requested term: Explicit contractual reservation of unlimited producer-organized community screenings at affordable/educational rates (not limited to 100 attendees), plus explicit right to license educational rights to third-party educational distributor at agreed terms (or right of first refusal to Harbor, short window).
- Business rationale: Protects credibility and access (Objective #1 & #4) and allows immediate educational revenue offers to be accepted.
- Realistic fallback: Increase free community screening cap to 250 attendees and a guaranteed right to license educational rights if Harbor declines direct assignment — or require Harbor to offer reduced non-theatrical rates for community partners.

3) Shorten/clarify Harbor’s SVOD/AVOD first-negotiation period and preserve timetable
- Requested term: Reduce 30-day first-negotiation right to 14 calendar days, require Harbor to engage in good-faith written negotiations with defined timelines, and provide explicit language that theatrical and TVOD release schedules will not be paused or delayed during negotiation.
- Business rationale: Keeps SVOD/AVOD as a near-term monetization option while avoiding indefinite hold-ups that could block public-television or other buyers.
- Realistic fallback: Keep 30 days but require Harbor to submit a written offer within 14 days and allow producer to market to SVOD/AVOD if no written offer is made within 30 days.

4) Contractual protections against editorial changes and participant harm
- Requested term: Insert an explicit clause: “No edits, cuts, or versions that materially change participant meaning or assign responsibility for causes of coastal loss may be made or publicly distributed without producer and director written approval.” Preserve right to withhold approval.
- Business rationale: Protects film credibility and relationships with participants, addresses the director’s explicit opposition, reduces reputational/legal risk.
- Realistic fallback: Maintain Harbor’s existing “No editorial changes without producer approval” language but add dispute resolution and a requirement for a transparent editorial-change log.

5) Confirm P&A/expense accounting and payment triggers
- Requested term: Detailed definitions for “recoupable expenses,” explicit caps, audit rights, and a schedule that P&A spend committed by Harbor is non-recourse to the producer for cash flow (i.e., Harbor-funded and recouped only from film receipts and not from additional producer cash obligations). Also require reporting cadence.
- Business rationale: Protects long-term economics and prevents surprise recoupment claims; enables producer to evaluate the real backend.
- Realistic fallback: Accept Harbor’s stated $300k guaranteed P&A and $100k recoupable expense cap but secure quarterly accounting and audit rights.

Section 5 — Decision conditions and open questions (must be confirmed before signing; counsel issues)
Must be confirmed before signing
- Confirm Harbor can and will sign and deliver the $250k advance within the stated timeline (signable by Aug 15; payment within 10 business days). Require written commitment of exact payment date in the term sheet.
- Get written commitment (and schedule) for any negotiated increased advance or cash bridge. If Harbor agrees to an increased advance, ensure the payment schedule and agent commission treatment are explicit.
- Counsel must confirm: precise waterfall language, definitions of “gross receipts,” recoupable expense categories, and ordering of recoupment (advance first, then expenses/P&A).
- Confirm that producer expressly retains educational, Canadian, and non-US international rights under the final Harbor deal (as stated) — include precise reservation clauses.
- Obtain explicit contractual language preserving producer approval over all editorial changes and marketing materials and the community-screening rights described above.

Ambiguities for counsel to resolve
- Harbor’s 30-day first-negotiation clause for US SVOD/AVOD: what happens to release timing during negotiation? (Ambiguous — require language specifying theatrical/TVOD rollout unaffected.)
- Waterfall ambiguities: confirm whether P&A recoupment is subordinated to advance recoupment or treated in parallel; confirm exact deduction order and allowable offsets and collection-account fees.
- Northlight: clarify the “three-minute aggregate edits” process and whether small edits that change tone are permitted; confirm community-screening rate mechanics.
- Vista: clarify what constitutes a “material change” to participant meaning (this is a vague standard that could be litigated).

Section 6 — Concise final recommendation (for reading aloud)
Recommendation for the producers’ meeting:
- Pursue Harbor (Offer B) as our preferred partner because it best protects credibility and community relationships while preserving the rights we need to monetize later. Immediately enter negotiations with Harbor to secure a materially larger advance (target $520k gross, realistic fallback $350k) and contractually lock protections for editorial approval, expanded community/educational access, a shortened SVOD negotiation window, and clarified P&A/expense accounting. Simultaneously, prepare fallback conversations with Northlight (Offer A) and pursue lender-extension and immediate outreach to public-television and educational buyers to close any remaining Sept 30 cash gap. Do not accept Vista (Offer C) unless the director and community agree in writing to the editorial and access tradeoffs; its immediate cash is attractive but would sacrifice our top priority — the film’s credibility and community relationships.

Separate facts vs. judgments/assumptions
- Facts: All figures, payment schedules, rights/territory lists, repayment obligations, sales-agent commission, and the director’s opposition to edits are taken only from the provided facts.
- Judgments/assumptions: Likely timings for payments where the offer gives an expectation (Vista’s 15 business days), feasibility of increasing Harbor’s advance, and likely community/public-TV timelines are judgments. We treat expressions of interest (public TV, educational, Canada) as nonbinding and not committed funding.

Next steps (operational)
1. Instruct counsel to prepare a negotiation letter to Harbor today with the five requested changes and a deadline for response (48–72 hours).
2. Simultaneously request a formal written commitment from Harbor for signing/payment timing if they will meet the immediate needs.
3. Ask production-side lenders to negotiate a conditional 60-day extension up to $150k now as a backup (do not rely on it).
4. Begin outreach to public-television, the educational distributor, and the Canadian contact to determine realistic timelines and whether they can deliver funds before Sept 30 (collect hard offers if possible).
5. Prepare a contingency plan to reopen Northlight negotiations if Harbor will not concede on cash or protections.

I will be available to draft the negotiation letter, run quick math scenarios for each revised advance level, and assist with counsel’s redlines on waterfall/accounting language.
Finish reason: stop
Try in Playground
import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  model: 'openai:gpt@5-mini',
  settings: {
    thinkingLevel: 'medium'
  },
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'You are advising the producers of TIDELINE, a completed 92-minute documentary about a Louisiana fishing community adapting to coastal erosion. Prepare a substantive distribution decision memo using only the facts below.\n\nPRODUCER OBJECTIVES, IN PRIORITY ORDER\n1. Protect the film’s credibility and community relationships.\n2. Secure enough near-term cash to satisfy the September 30 obligations described below.\n3. Achieve broad US audience reach within 12 months.\n4. Preserve educational and community-screening access at affordable prices.\n5. Retain meaningful approval or consultation over edits, key art, trailer, and publicity framing.\n6. Maximize long-term economics, without relying on speculative performance forecasts.\n\nFINANCIAL POSITION\n- A $420,000 bridge loan must be repaid by September 30. Assume the stated amount includes all interest and fees.\n- The production also owes $40,000 in deferred crew compensation on September 30.\n- The sales agent receives 10% of every license fee, minimum guarantee, or advance paid to the producer, deducted when each payment is received. For this exercise, do not apply the commission to later backend distributions.\n- Ignore taxes and the time value of money.\n- The producer currently has no unrestricted cash available for these obligations.\n\nOFFER A — NORTHLIGHT RELEASING\n- Territory: United States and Canada.\n- Rights: all media, including theatrical, television, TVOD, SVOD, AVOD, educational, non-theatrical, airlines, and community screenings.\n- Term: 12 years.\n- Minimum guarantee: $550,000, recoupable; 50% on signing and 50% on delivery acceptance.\n- Northlight says signing can occur by August 20, but delivery acceptance may take up to 60 days after delivery. The film is ready to deliver immediately.\n- Distribution fee: 25% of gross receipts.\n- Recoupable distribution expenses: capped at $175,000, excluding residuals and collection-account fees.\n- P&A: $350,000 guaranteed spend, treated as a recoupable distribution expense but not counted against the $175,000 expense cap.\n- Release: minimum 20-market theatrical release followed by digital availability; no firm dates.\n- Producer approvals: consultation only on trailer and key art. Northlight may request edits, but producer approval is required for edits exceeding an aggregate of three minutes.\n- Community screenings must be booked through Northlight at its standard non-theatrical rates.\n- Producer backend: 75% of gross receipts remaining after the distribution fee, then applied first to recoup the minimum guarantee, expenses, and P&A; subsequent net proceeds are paid to the producer.\n\nOFFER B — HARBOR DOCUMENTARIES\n- Territory: United States only.\n- Rights: theatrical and TVOD exclusively; free community screenings of up to 100 attendees are expressly reserved to the producer. All other rights, including SVOD, AVOD, television, educational, non-theatrical, international, and Canada, remain available.\n- Term: 7 years.\n- Advance: $250,000, recoupable, payable in full within 10 business days after signing.\n- Harbor can sign by August 15.\n- Distribution fee: 18% of gross receipts from Harbor-controlled rights.\n- Recoupable expenses: capped at $100,000.\n- P&A: Harbor plans up to $500,000, but guarantees only $300,000. All P&A is recoupable; the first $300,000 is outside the expense cap, while any additional P&A requires producer approval and counts against the expense cap.\n- Release: theatrical launch in at least 12 markets by November 15, followed by TVOD no later than 45 days after the theatrical launch.\n- Producer has mutual approval over key art and trailer, approval not to be unreasonably withheld. No editorial changes without producer approval.\n- Harbor receives a 30-day first-negotiation right for US SVOD and AVOD, beginning after the first public theatrical screening. The proposal does not specify what happens to the release schedule while that negotiation is open.\n- Producer backend: 82% of gross receipts remaining after the distribution fee, then applied first to recoup the advance, expenses, and P&A; subsequent net proceeds are paid to the producer.\n\nOFFER C — VISTA STREAMING\n- Territory: worldwide.\n- Rights: exclusive SVOD, AVOD, television, educational, non-theatrical, and community-screening rights. Producer retains theatrical and TVOD rights, but may exploit them only during a 60-day window beginning before Vista’s launch date.\n- Term: 15 years.\n- License fee: $1,200,000; $800,000 on delivery acceptance and $400,000 on the platform launch date.\n- Vista expects delivery acceptance within 15 business days and proposes a launch between January 15 and March 31, but the agreement contains no fixed launch date.\n- No backend participation.\n- Marketing commitment: “customary platform support,” with no minimum spend or placement guarantee.\n- Vista controls key art, trailer, title treatment, synopsis, and publicity positioning after good-faith consultation with the producer.\n- Vista may create a platform version up to eight minutes shorter. It must consult the producer but does not need approval unless an edit materially changes a participant’s meaning.\n- Vista will permit up to 25 producer-organized free community screenings per year, subject to prior written approval and venue reporting. It has not provided educational pricing.\n- Vista may sublicense the covered rights without producer approval.\n\nADDITIONAL FACTS\n- A national public-television strand has expressed nonbinding interest in paying $180,000 for a three-year US broadcast license, but it cannot negotiate while another party controls US television rights.\n- An educational distributor has expressed nonbinding interest in a seven-year US educational license with a $75,000 advance and a 50/50 revenue split after recoupment. It requires the producer to retain educational rights.\n- A Canadian distributor has informally estimated a possible $60,000–$100,000 minimum guarantee, but has not screened the film.\n- The director strongly opposes edits that could make participants appear responsible for conditions caused by industrial land loss or public policy.\n- The producers may ask existing lenders to extend up to $150,000 of the bridge loan for 60 days, but no extension is committed.\n- Do not treat any expression of interest or possible extension as committed money.\n\nDELIVERABLE\nWrite a polished internal memo addressed to the producing team, approximately 1,500–2,000 words, with these sections:\n1. Executive recommendation: identify the preferred offer, whether it should be accepted as written, and the best fallback.\n2. September 30 liquidity test: show the arithmetic for cash received, sales-agent commission, and any funding gap under each offer. Distinguish committed timing from uncertain timing.\n3. Comparative analysis: evaluate economics, rights retained, audience strategy, editorial and marketing control, community access, term, territory, and execution risk. Explain why headline dollar amounts alone are misleading.\n4. Negotiation plan: list the five highest-priority changes to request from the preferred bidder, ordered by importance. For each, provide the requested term, business rationale, and a realistic fallback position.\n5. Decision conditions and open questions: state what must be confirmed before signing and identify ambiguities that counsel should resolve.\n6. A concise final recommendation suitable for reading aloud at a producer meeting.\n\nUse tables where they improve clarity. Separate facts from assumptions and judgments. Do not invent revenue projections, legal rules, or unstated deal terms. Flag any waterfall language that cannot be interpreted confidently rather than silently repairing it. Maintain a commercially practical, decisive tone rather than offering generic pros and cons. This is business analysis, not legal advice.'
    }
  ]
})
import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "model": "openai:gpt@5-mini",
            "settings": {
                "thinkingLevel": "medium"
            },
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "You are advising the producers of TIDELINE, a completed 92-minute documentary about a Louisiana fishing community adapting to coastal erosion. Prepare a substantive distribution decision memo using only the facts below.\n\nPRODUCER OBJECTIVES, IN PRIORITY ORDER\n1. Protect the film’s credibility and community relationships.\n2. Secure enough near-term cash to satisfy the September 30 obligations described below.\n3. Achieve broad US audience reach within 12 months.\n4. Preserve educational and community-screening access at affordable prices.\n5. Retain meaningful approval or consultation over edits, key art, trailer, and publicity framing.\n6. Maximize long-term economics, without relying on speculative performance forecasts.\n\nFINANCIAL POSITION\n- A $420,000 bridge loan must be repaid by September 30. Assume the stated amount includes all interest and fees.\n- The production also owes $40,000 in deferred crew compensation on September 30.\n- The sales agent receives 10% of every license fee, minimum guarantee, or advance paid to the producer, deducted when each payment is received. For this exercise, do not apply the commission to later backend distributions.\n- Ignore taxes and the time value of money.\n- The producer currently has no unrestricted cash available for these obligations.\n\nOFFER A — NORTHLIGHT RELEASING\n- Territory: United States and Canada.\n- Rights: all media, including theatrical, television, TVOD, SVOD, AVOD, educational, non-theatrical, airlines, and community screenings.\n- Term: 12 years.\n- Minimum guarantee: $550,000, recoupable; 50% on signing and 50% on delivery acceptance.\n- Northlight says signing can occur by August 20, but delivery acceptance may take up to 60 days after delivery. The film is ready to deliver immediately.\n- Distribution fee: 25% of gross receipts.\n- Recoupable distribution expenses: capped at $175,000, excluding residuals and collection-account fees.\n- P&A: $350,000 guaranteed spend, treated as a recoupable distribution expense but not counted against the $175,000 expense cap.\n- Release: minimum 20-market theatrical release followed by digital availability; no firm dates.\n- Producer approvals: consultation only on trailer and key art. Northlight may request edits, but producer approval is required for edits exceeding an aggregate of three minutes.\n- Community screenings must be booked through Northlight at its standard non-theatrical rates.\n- Producer backend: 75% of gross receipts remaining after the distribution fee, then applied first to recoup the minimum guarantee, expenses, and P&A; subsequent net proceeds are paid to the producer.\n\nOFFER B — HARBOR DOCUMENTARIES\n- Territory: United States only.\n- Rights: theatrical and TVOD exclusively; free community screenings of up to 100 attendees are expressly reserved to the producer. All other rights, including SVOD, AVOD, television, educational, non-theatrical, international, and Canada, remain available.\n- Term: 7 years.\n- Advance: $250,000, recoupable, payable in full within 10 business days after signing.\n- Harbor can sign by August 15.\n- Distribution fee: 18% of gross receipts from Harbor-controlled rights.\n- Recoupable expenses: capped at $100,000.\n- P&A: Harbor plans up to $500,000, but guarantees only $300,000. All P&A is recoupable; the first $300,000 is outside the expense cap, while any additional P&A requires producer approval and counts against the expense cap.\n- Release: theatrical launch in at least 12 markets by November 15, followed by TVOD no later than 45 days after the theatrical launch.\n- Producer has mutual approval over key art and trailer, approval not to be unreasonably withheld. No editorial changes without producer approval.\n- Harbor receives a 30-day first-negotiation right for US SVOD and AVOD, beginning after the first public theatrical screening. The proposal does not specify what happens to the release schedule while that negotiation is open.\n- Producer backend: 82% of gross receipts remaining after the distribution fee, then applied first to recoup the advance, expenses, and P&A; subsequent net proceeds are paid to the producer.\n\nOFFER C — VISTA STREAMING\n- Territory: worldwide.\n- Rights: exclusive SVOD, AVOD, television, educational, non-theatrical, and community-screening rights. Producer retains theatrical and TVOD rights, but may exploit them only during a 60-day window beginning before Vista’s launch date.\n- Term: 15 years.\n- License fee: $1,200,000; $800,000 on delivery acceptance and $400,000 on the platform launch date.\n- Vista expects delivery acceptance within 15 business days and proposes a launch between January 15 and March 31, but the agreement contains no fixed launch date.\n- No backend participation.\n- Marketing commitment: “customary platform support,” with no minimum spend or placement guarantee.\n- Vista controls key art, trailer, title treatment, synopsis, and publicity positioning after good-faith consultation with the producer.\n- Vista may create a platform version up to eight minutes shorter. It must consult the producer but does not need approval unless an edit materially changes a participant’s meaning.\n- Vista will permit up to 25 producer-organized free community screenings per year, subject to prior written approval and venue reporting. It has not provided educational pricing.\n- Vista may sublicense the covered rights without producer approval.\n\nADDITIONAL FACTS\n- A national public-television strand has expressed nonbinding interest in paying $180,000 for a three-year US broadcast license, but it cannot negotiate while another party controls US television rights.\n- An educational distributor has expressed nonbinding interest in a seven-year US educational license with a $75,000 advance and a 50/50 revenue split after recoupment. It requires the producer to retain educational rights.\n- A Canadian distributor has informally estimated a possible $60,000–$100,000 minimum guarantee, but has not screened the film.\n- The director strongly opposes edits that could make participants appear responsible for conditions caused by industrial land loss or public policy.\n- The producers may ask existing lenders to extend up to $150,000 of the bridge loan for 60 days, but no extension is committed.\n- Do not treat any expression of interest or possible extension as committed money.\n\nDELIVERABLE\nWrite a polished internal memo addressed to the producing team, approximately 1,500–2,000 words, with these sections:\n1. Executive recommendation: identify the preferred offer, whether it should be accepted as written, and the best fallback.\n2. September 30 liquidity test: show the arithmetic for cash received, sales-agent commission, and any funding gap under each offer. Distinguish committed timing from uncertain timing.\n3. Comparative analysis: evaluate economics, rights retained, audience strategy, editorial and marketing control, community access, term, territory, and execution risk. Explain why headline dollar amounts alone are misleading.\n4. Negotiation plan: list the five highest-priority changes to request from the preferred bidder, ordered by importance. For each, provide the requested term, business rationale, and a realistic fallback position.\n5. Decision conditions and open questions: state what must be confirmed before signing and identify ambiguities that counsel should resolve.\n6. A concise final recommendation suitable for reading aloud at a producer meeting.\n\nUse tables where they improve clarity. Separate facts from assumptions and judgments. Do not invent revenue projections, legal rules, or unstated deal terms. Flag any waterfall language that cannot be interpreted confidently rather than silently repairing it. Maintain a commercially practical, decisive tone rather than offering generic pros and cons. This is business analysis, not legal advice."
                }
            ]
        })


asyncio.run(main())
curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "d029067f-e25a-4dfc-8742-c8d4ead25069",
      "model": "openai:gpt@5-mini",
      "settings": {
        "thinkingLevel": "medium"
      },
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "You are advising the producers of TIDELINE, a completed 92-minute documentary about a Louisiana fishing community adapting to coastal erosion. Prepare a substantive distribution decision memo using only the facts below.\n\nPRODUCER OBJECTIVES, IN PRIORITY ORDER\n1. Protect the film’s credibility and community relationships.\n2. Secure enough near-term cash to satisfy the September 30 obligations described below.\n3. Achieve broad US audience reach within 12 months.\n4. Preserve educational and community-screening access at affordable prices.\n5. Retain meaningful approval or consultation over edits, key art, trailer, and publicity framing.\n6. Maximize long-term economics, without relying on speculative performance forecasts.\n\nFINANCIAL POSITION\n- A $420,000 bridge loan must be repaid by September 30. Assume the stated amount includes all interest and fees.\n- The production also owes $40,000 in deferred crew compensation on September 30.\n- The sales agent receives 10% of every license fee, minimum guarantee, or advance paid to the producer, deducted when each payment is received. For this exercise, do not apply the commission to later backend distributions.\n- Ignore taxes and the time value of money.\n- The producer currently has no unrestricted cash available for these obligations.\n\nOFFER A — NORTHLIGHT RELEASING\n- Territory: United States and Canada.\n- Rights: all media, including theatrical, television, TVOD, SVOD, AVOD, educational, non-theatrical, airlines, and community screenings.\n- Term: 12 years.\n- Minimum guarantee: $550,000, recoupable; 50% on signing and 50% on delivery acceptance.\n- Northlight says signing can occur by August 20, but delivery acceptance may take up to 60 days after delivery. The film is ready to deliver immediately.\n- Distribution fee: 25% of gross receipts.\n- Recoupable distribution expenses: capped at $175,000, excluding residuals and collection-account fees.\n- P&A: $350,000 guaranteed spend, treated as a recoupable distribution expense but not counted against the $175,000 expense cap.\n- Release: minimum 20-market theatrical release followed by digital availability; no firm dates.\n- Producer approvals: consultation only on trailer and key art. Northlight may request edits, but producer approval is required for edits exceeding an aggregate of three minutes.\n- Community screenings must be booked through Northlight at its standard non-theatrical rates.\n- Producer backend: 75% of gross receipts remaining after the distribution fee, then applied first to recoup the minimum guarantee, expenses, and P&A; subsequent net proceeds are paid to the producer.\n\nOFFER B — HARBOR DOCUMENTARIES\n- Territory: United States only.\n- Rights: theatrical and TVOD exclusively; free community screenings of up to 100 attendees are expressly reserved to the producer. All other rights, including SVOD, AVOD, television, educational, non-theatrical, international, and Canada, remain available.\n- Term: 7 years.\n- Advance: $250,000, recoupable, payable in full within 10 business days after signing.\n- Harbor can sign by August 15.\n- Distribution fee: 18% of gross receipts from Harbor-controlled rights.\n- Recoupable expenses: capped at $100,000.\n- P&A: Harbor plans up to $500,000, but guarantees only $300,000. All P&A is recoupable; the first $300,000 is outside the expense cap, while any additional P&A requires producer approval and counts against the expense cap.\n- Release: theatrical launch in at least 12 markets by November 15, followed by TVOD no later than 45 days after the theatrical launch.\n- Producer has mutual approval over key art and trailer, approval not to be unreasonably withheld. No editorial changes without producer approval.\n- Harbor receives a 30-day first-negotiation right for US SVOD and AVOD, beginning after the first public theatrical screening. The proposal does not specify what happens to the release schedule while that negotiation is open.\n- Producer backend: 82% of gross receipts remaining after the distribution fee, then applied first to recoup the advance, expenses, and P&A; subsequent net proceeds are paid to the producer.\n\nOFFER C — VISTA STREAMING\n- Territory: worldwide.\n- Rights: exclusive SVOD, AVOD, television, educational, non-theatrical, and community-screening rights. Producer retains theatrical and TVOD rights, but may exploit them only during a 60-day window beginning before Vista’s launch date.\n- Term: 15 years.\n- License fee: $1,200,000; $800,000 on delivery acceptance and $400,000 on the platform launch date.\n- Vista expects delivery acceptance within 15 business days and proposes a launch between January 15 and March 31, but the agreement contains no fixed launch date.\n- No backend participation.\n- Marketing commitment: “customary platform support,” with no minimum spend or placement guarantee.\n- Vista controls key art, trailer, title treatment, synopsis, and publicity positioning after good-faith consultation with the producer.\n- Vista may create a platform version up to eight minutes shorter. It must consult the producer but does not need approval unless an edit materially changes a participant’s meaning.\n- Vista will permit up to 25 producer-organized free community screenings per year, subject to prior written approval and venue reporting. It has not provided educational pricing.\n- Vista may sublicense the covered rights without producer approval.\n\nADDITIONAL FACTS\n- A national public-television strand has expressed nonbinding interest in paying $180,000 for a three-year US broadcast license, but it cannot negotiate while another party controls US television rights.\n- An educational distributor has expressed nonbinding interest in a seven-year US educational license with a $75,000 advance and a 50/50 revenue split after recoupment. It requires the producer to retain educational rights.\n- A Canadian distributor has informally estimated a possible $60,000–$100,000 minimum guarantee, but has not screened the film.\n- The director strongly opposes edits that could make participants appear responsible for conditions caused by industrial land loss or public policy.\n- The producers may ask existing lenders to extend up to $150,000 of the bridge loan for 60 days, but no extension is committed.\n- Do not treat any expression of interest or possible extension as committed money.\n\nDELIVERABLE\nWrite a polished internal memo addressed to the producing team, approximately 1,500–2,000 words, with these sections:\n1. Executive recommendation: identify the preferred offer, whether it should be accepted as written, and the best fallback.\n2. September 30 liquidity test: show the arithmetic for cash received, sales-agent commission, and any funding gap under each offer. Distinguish committed timing from uncertain timing.\n3. Comparative analysis: evaluate economics, rights retained, audience strategy, editorial and marketing control, community access, term, territory, and execution risk. Explain why headline dollar amounts alone are misleading.\n4. Negotiation plan: list the five highest-priority changes to request from the preferred bidder, ordered by importance. For each, provide the requested term, business rationale, and a realistic fallback position.\n5. Decision conditions and open questions: state what must be confirmed before signing and identify ambiguities that counsel should resolve.\n6. A concise final recommendation suitable for reading aloud at a producer meeting.\n\nUse tables where they improve clarity. Separate facts from assumptions and judgments. Do not invent revenue projections, legal rules, or unstated deal terms. Flag any waterfall language that cannot be interpreted confidently rather than silently repairing it. Maintain a commercially practical, decisive tone rather than offering generic pros and cons. This is business analysis, not legal advice."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]'
runware run openai:gpt@5-mini \
  settings.thinkingLevel=medium \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="You are advising the producers of TIDELINE, a completed 92-minute documentary about a Louisiana fishing community adapting to coastal erosion. Prepare a substantive distribution decision memo using only the facts below.

PRODUCER OBJECTIVES, IN PRIORITY ORDER
1. Protect the film’s credibility and community relationships.
2. Secure enough near-term cash to satisfy the September 30 obligations described below.
3. Achieve broad US audience reach within 12 months.
4. Preserve educational and community-screening access at affordable prices.
5. Retain meaningful approval or consultation over edits, key art, trailer, and publicity framing.
6. Maximize long-term economics, without relying on speculative performance forecasts.

FINANCIAL POSITION
- A \$420,000 bridge loan must be repaid by September 30. Assume the stated amount includes all interest and fees.
- The production also owes \$40,000 in deferred crew compensation on September 30.
- The sales agent receives 10% of every license fee, minimum guarantee, or advance paid to the producer, deducted when each payment is received. For this exercise, do not apply the commission to later backend distributions.
- Ignore taxes and the time value of money.
- The producer currently has no unrestricted cash available for these obligations.

OFFER A — NORTHLIGHT RELEASING
- Territory: United States and Canada.
- Rights: all media, including theatrical, television, TVOD, SVOD, AVOD, educational, non-theatrical, airlines, and community screenings.
- Term: 12 years.
- Minimum guarantee: \$550,000, recoupable; 50% on signing and 50% on delivery acceptance.
- Northlight says signing can occur by August 20, but delivery acceptance may take up to 60 days after delivery. The film is ready to deliver immediately.
- Distribution fee: 25% of gross receipts.
- Recoupable distribution expenses: capped at \$175,000, excluding residuals and collection-account fees.
- P&A: \$350,000 guaranteed spend, treated as a recoupable distribution expense but not counted against the \$175,000 expense cap.
- Release: minimum 20-market theatrical release followed by digital availability; no firm dates.
- Producer approvals: consultation only on trailer and key art. Northlight may request edits, but producer approval is required for edits exceeding an aggregate of three minutes.
- Community screenings must be booked through Northlight at its standard non-theatrical rates.
- Producer backend: 75% of gross receipts remaining after the distribution fee, then applied first to recoup the minimum guarantee, expenses, and P&A; subsequent net proceeds are paid to the producer.

OFFER B — HARBOR DOCUMENTARIES
- Territory: United States only.
- Rights: theatrical and TVOD exclusively; free community screenings of up to 100 attendees are expressly reserved to the producer. All other rights, including SVOD, AVOD, television, educational, non-theatrical, international, and Canada, remain available.
- Term: 7 years.
- Advance: \$250,000, recoupable, payable in full within 10 business days after signing.
- Harbor can sign by August 15.
- Distribution fee: 18% of gross receipts from Harbor-controlled rights.
- Recoupable expenses: capped at \$100,000.
- P&A: Harbor plans up to \$500,000, but guarantees only \$300,000. All P&A is recoupable; the first \$300,000 is outside the expense cap, while any additional P&A requires producer approval and counts against the expense cap.
- Release: theatrical launch in at least 12 markets by November 15, followed by TVOD no later than 45 days after the theatrical launch.
- Producer has mutual approval over key art and trailer, approval not to be unreasonably withheld. No editorial changes without producer approval.
- Harbor receives a 30-day first-negotiation right for US SVOD and AVOD, beginning after the first public theatrical screening. The proposal does not specify what happens to the release schedule while that negotiation is open.
- Producer backend: 82% of gross receipts remaining after the distribution fee, then applied first to recoup the advance, expenses, and P&A; subsequent net proceeds are paid to the producer.

OFFER C — VISTA STREAMING
- Territory: worldwide.
- Rights: exclusive SVOD, AVOD, television, educational, non-theatrical, and community-screening rights. Producer retains theatrical and TVOD rights, but may exploit them only during a 60-day window beginning before Vista’s launch date.
- Term: 15 years.
- License fee: \$1,200,000; \$800,000 on delivery acceptance and \$400,000 on the platform launch date.
- Vista expects delivery acceptance within 15 business days and proposes a launch between January 15 and March 31, but the agreement contains no fixed launch date.
- No backend participation.
- Marketing commitment: “customary platform support,” with no minimum spend or placement guarantee.
- Vista controls key art, trailer, title treatment, synopsis, and publicity positioning after good-faith consultation with the producer.
- Vista may create a platform version up to eight minutes shorter. It must consult the producer but does not need approval unless an edit materially changes a participant’s meaning.
- Vista will permit up to 25 producer-organized free community screenings per year, subject to prior written approval and venue reporting. It has not provided educational pricing.
- Vista may sublicense the covered rights without producer approval.

ADDITIONAL FACTS
- A national public-television strand has expressed nonbinding interest in paying \$180,000 for a three-year US broadcast license, but it cannot negotiate while another party controls US television rights.
- An educational distributor has expressed nonbinding interest in a seven-year US educational license with a \$75,000 advance and a 50/50 revenue split after recoupment. It requires the producer to retain educational rights.
- A Canadian distributor has informally estimated a possible \$60,000–\$100,000 minimum guarantee, but has not screened the film.
- The director strongly opposes edits that could make participants appear responsible for conditions caused by industrial land loss or public policy.
- The producers may ask existing lenders to extend up to \$150,000 of the bridge loan for 60 days, but no extension is committed.
- Do not treat any expression of interest or possible extension as committed money.

DELIVERABLE
Write a polished internal memo addressed to the producing team, approximately 1,500–2,000 words, with these sections:
1. Executive recommendation: identify the preferred offer, whether it should be accepted as written, and the best fallback.
2. September 30 liquidity test: show the arithmetic for cash received, sales-agent commission, and any funding gap under each offer. Distinguish committed timing from uncertain timing.
3. Comparative analysis: evaluate economics, rights retained, audience strategy, editorial and marketing control, community access, term, territory, and execution risk. Explain why headline dollar amounts alone are misleading.
4. Negotiation plan: list the five highest-priority changes to request from the preferred bidder, ordered by importance. For each, provide the requested term, business rationale, and a realistic fallback position.
5. Decision conditions and open questions: state what must be confirmed before signing and identify ambiguities that counsel should resolve.
6. A concise final recommendation suitable for reading aloud at a producer meeting.

Use tables where they improve clarity. Separate facts from assumptions and judgments. Do not invent revenue projections, legal rules, or unstated deal terms. Flag any waterfall language that cannot be interpreted confidently rather than silently repairing it. Maintain a commercially practical, decisive tone rather than offering generic pros and cons. This is business analysis, not legal advice."
{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "d029067f-e25a-4dfc-8742-c8d4ead25069",
  "model": "openai:gpt@5-mini",
  "settings": {
    "thinkingLevel": "medium"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "You are advising the producers of TIDELINE, a completed 92-minute documentary about a Louisiana fishing community adapting to coastal erosion. Prepare a substantive distribution decision memo using only the facts below.\n\nPRODUCER OBJECTIVES, IN PRIORITY ORDER\n1. Protect the film’s credibility and community relationships.\n2. Secure enough near-term cash to satisfy the September 30 obligations described below.\n3. Achieve broad US audience reach within 12 months.\n4. Preserve educational and community-screening access at affordable prices.\n5. Retain meaningful approval or consultation over edits, key art, trailer, and publicity framing.\n6. Maximize long-term economics, without relying on speculative performance forecasts.\n\nFINANCIAL POSITION\n- A $420,000 bridge loan must be repaid by September 30. Assume the stated amount includes all interest and fees.\n- The production also owes $40,000 in deferred crew compensation on September 30.\n- The sales agent receives 10% of every license fee, minimum guarantee, or advance paid to the producer, deducted when each payment is received. For this exercise, do not apply the commission to later backend distributions.\n- Ignore taxes and the time value of money.\n- The producer currently has no unrestricted cash available for these obligations.\n\nOFFER A — NORTHLIGHT RELEASING\n- Territory: United States and Canada.\n- Rights: all media, including theatrical, television, TVOD, SVOD, AVOD, educational, non-theatrical, airlines, and community screenings.\n- Term: 12 years.\n- Minimum guarantee: $550,000, recoupable; 50% on signing and 50% on delivery acceptance.\n- Northlight says signing can occur by August 20, but delivery acceptance may take up to 60 days after delivery. The film is ready to deliver immediately.\n- Distribution fee: 25% of gross receipts.\n- Recoupable distribution expenses: capped at $175,000, excluding residuals and collection-account fees.\n- P&A: $350,000 guaranteed spend, treated as a recoupable distribution expense but not counted against the $175,000 expense cap.\n- Release: minimum 20-market theatrical release followed by digital availability; no firm dates.\n- Producer approvals: consultation only on trailer and key art. Northlight may request edits, but producer approval is required for edits exceeding an aggregate of three minutes.\n- Community screenings must be booked through Northlight at its standard non-theatrical rates.\n- Producer backend: 75% of gross receipts remaining after the distribution fee, then applied first to recoup the minimum guarantee, expenses, and P&A; subsequent net proceeds are paid to the producer.\n\nOFFER B — HARBOR DOCUMENTARIES\n- Territory: United States only.\n- Rights: theatrical and TVOD exclusively; free community screenings of up to 100 attendees are expressly reserved to the producer. All other rights, including SVOD, AVOD, television, educational, non-theatrical, international, and Canada, remain available.\n- Term: 7 years.\n- Advance: $250,000, recoupable, payable in full within 10 business days after signing.\n- Harbor can sign by August 15.\n- Distribution fee: 18% of gross receipts from Harbor-controlled rights.\n- Recoupable expenses: capped at $100,000.\n- P&A: Harbor plans up to $500,000, but guarantees only $300,000. All P&A is recoupable; the first $300,000 is outside the expense cap, while any additional P&A requires producer approval and counts against the expense cap.\n- Release: theatrical launch in at least 12 markets by November 15, followed by TVOD no later than 45 days after the theatrical launch.\n- Producer has mutual approval over key art and trailer, approval not to be unreasonably withheld. No editorial changes without producer approval.\n- Harbor receives a 30-day first-negotiation right for US SVOD and AVOD, beginning after the first public theatrical screening. The proposal does not specify what happens to the release schedule while that negotiation is open.\n- Producer backend: 82% of gross receipts remaining after the distribution fee, then applied first to recoup the advance, expenses, and P&A; subsequent net proceeds are paid to the producer.\n\nOFFER C — VISTA STREAMING\n- Territory: worldwide.\n- Rights: exclusive SVOD, AVOD, television, educational, non-theatrical, and community-screening rights. Producer retains theatrical and TVOD rights, but may exploit them only during a 60-day window beginning before Vista’s launch date.\n- Term: 15 years.\n- License fee: $1,200,000; $800,000 on delivery acceptance and $400,000 on the platform launch date.\n- Vista expects delivery acceptance within 15 business days and proposes a launch between January 15 and March 31, but the agreement contains no fixed launch date.\n- No backend participation.\n- Marketing commitment: “customary platform support,” with no minimum spend or placement guarantee.\n- Vista controls key art, trailer, title treatment, synopsis, and publicity positioning after good-faith consultation with the producer.\n- Vista may create a platform version up to eight minutes shorter. It must consult the producer but does not need approval unless an edit materially changes a participant’s meaning.\n- Vista will permit up to 25 producer-organized free community screenings per year, subject to prior written approval and venue reporting. It has not provided educational pricing.\n- Vista may sublicense the covered rights without producer approval.\n\nADDITIONAL FACTS\n- A national public-television strand has expressed nonbinding interest in paying $180,000 for a three-year US broadcast license, but it cannot negotiate while another party controls US television rights.\n- An educational distributor has expressed nonbinding interest in a seven-year US educational license with a $75,000 advance and a 50/50 revenue split after recoupment. It requires the producer to retain educational rights.\n- A Canadian distributor has informally estimated a possible $60,000–$100,000 minimum guarantee, but has not screened the film.\n- The director strongly opposes edits that could make participants appear responsible for conditions caused by industrial land loss or public policy.\n- The producers may ask existing lenders to extend up to $150,000 of the bridge loan for 60 days, but no extension is committed.\n- Do not treat any expression of interest or possible extension as committed money.\n\nDELIVERABLE\nWrite a polished internal memo addressed to the producing team, approximately 1,500–2,000 words, with these sections:\n1. Executive recommendation: identify the preferred offer, whether it should be accepted as written, and the best fallback.\n2. September 30 liquidity test: show the arithmetic for cash received, sales-agent commission, and any funding gap under each offer. Distinguish committed timing from uncertain timing.\n3. Comparative analysis: evaluate economics, rights retained, audience strategy, editorial and marketing control, community access, term, territory, and execution risk. Explain why headline dollar amounts alone are misleading.\n4. Negotiation plan: list the five highest-priority changes to request from the preferred bidder, ordered by importance. For each, provide the requested term, business rationale, and a realistic fallback position.\n5. Decision conditions and open questions: state what must be confirmed before signing and identify ambiguities that counsel should resolve.\n6. A concise final recommendation suitable for reading aloud at a producer meeting.\n\nUse tables where they improve clarity. Separate facts from assumptions and judgments. Do not invent revenue projections, legal rules, or unstated deal terms. Flag any waterfall language that cannot be interpreted confidently rather than silently repairing it. Maintain a commercially practical, decisive tone rather than offering generic pros and cons. This is business analysis, not legal advice."
    }
  ]
}
Response
{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "d029067f-e25a-4dfc-8742-c8d4ead25069",
  "text": "TO: Producing Team, TIDELINE\nFROM: [Senior Distribution Advisor]\nRE: Distribution decision and immediate liquidity analysis — recommendation, Sept 30 cash test, comparative analysis, negotiation plan, and decision conditions\n\nDate: Immediate\n\nExecutive recommendation (top-line)\n- Preferred offer: Accept Offer B (Harbor Documentaries) subject to negotiated changes (see negotiation plan). Rationale: it best protects the film’s credibility and community relationships (Producer Objective #1) while preserving key rights needed to execute Objective #3–#6. It also delivers a firm near-term cash payment that can be combined with short-term bridge strategies to meet the September 30 obligations.\n- Accept as written only if the negotiated changes below are refused and the producers judge the residual cash plan workable (see fallback cash measures). But do not accept Offer C (Vista) because its editorial/marketing control and community restrictions directly conflict with the top priority (credibility/relationships). Offer A (Northlight) is the secondary fallback if Harbor cannot be improved to meet our top negotiation priorities; Northlight gives more immediate cash than Harbor but imposes limits on community access and permits edits that risk participant framing.\n- Best fallback: Offer A (Northlight) — accept only if Harbor cannot (a) increase advance to materially reduce the Sept 30 gap, or (b) amend SVOD negotiation/marketing and community-screening protections. Vista should be rejected unless the director and community are willing to accept significant editorial and access compromises despite immediate solvency relief.\n\nSection 2 — September 30 liquidity test (facts and arithmetic)\nFacts (contractual timing items given)\n- Bridge loan due Sept 30: $420,000 (includes interest/fees).\n- Deferred crew compensation due Sept 30: $40,000.\n- Sales agent commission: 10% of any license fee, minimum guarantee, or advance, deducted when each payment is received.\n- Producers currently have no unrestricted cash.\n\nWe show gross cash to the producer by Sept 30, the sales-agent commission on payments received, net cash to producer, and resulting funding gap versus $460,000 obligations. We separate committed payments (firm, with contractual timing that can occur before Sept 30) from uncertain/expected payments.\n\nLiquidity table (committed vs. realistic/likely scenarios)\n\n- Offer A — Northlight (US/Canada all-media MG $550,000; 50% on signing, 50% on delivery acceptance)\n  - Committed by Sept 30 (realistic signing by Aug 20): 50% on signing = $275,000 (signing can occur by Aug 20).\n    - Sales agent commission (10% when payment received): $27,500.\n    - Net to producer: $247,500.\n    - Funding gap: $460,000 - $247,500 = $212,500 shortfall.\n  - Uncertain by Sept 30: second 50% ($275,000) — Northlight may take up to 60 days after delivery to accept; if acceptance occurs before Sept 30 cash would increase by $247,500 net (after commission), eliminating the gap and leaving surplus. But this second tranche is not contractually guaranteed before Sept 30.\n\n- Offer B — Harbor (US theatrical & TVOD exclusives; $250,000 advance payable within 10 business days after signing)\n  - Committed by Sept 30 (Harbor can sign by Aug 15): $250,000 advance within ~10 business days.\n    - Sales agent commission (10%): $25,000.\n    - Net to producer: $225,000.\n    - Funding gap: $460,000 - $225,000 = $235,000 shortfall.\n  - Uncertain by Sept 30: additional licenses (public-television, educational, Canada) remain available to monetize but are expressions of interest only and not committed.\n\n- Offer C — Vista (worldwide SVOD/AVOD/TV/educational; $1,200,000: $800k on delivery acceptance, $400k on platform launch)\n  - Conservative (no payment before Sept 30): $0 received → funding gap = $460,000.\n  - Reasonable/likely scenario (Vista expects delivery acceptance within 15 business days): $800,000 received by Sept 30.\n    - Sales agent commission (10%): $80,000.\n    - Net to producer: $720,000.\n    - Surplus over obligations: $720,000 - $460,000 = $260,000 surplus.\n  - Note: the $800k timing is an expectation in Offer C, not an unconditional, irrevocable guarantee in the wording we have. The second $400k is tied to platform launch (Jan–Mar window, no fixed date).\n\nImmediate practical implication\n- Only Vista clearly offers the potential to solve the Sept 30 cash need by itself (in the reasonable/likely timing scenario). Harbor and Northlight leave six-figure shortfalls that must be closed via (a) escalation of the advance, (b) lender extension(s) up to $150k (not committed), (c) immediate licensing of remaining rights (public TV, educational, Canada), or (d) combination of the above.\n\nSection 3 — Comparative analysis (economics, rights, control, access, and execution risk)\nWe evaluate offers against the producer objectives in priority order and flag where headline dollars are misleading.\n\n1) Credibility and community relationships (Objective #1)\n- Harbor (B): Strongest protection. No editorial changes without producer approval; mutual approval over key art/trailer; expressly reserves producer free community screenings (up to 100 attendees). This aligns with the director’s sensitivity to participant portrayal and preserves community access for grassroots screenings.\n- Northlight (A): Risky. Consultation only on trailer/key art; Northlight may request edits and only requires producer approval for cumulative edits exceeding three minutes — that permits multiple small edits that could change emphasis/meaning. Also Centralizes community screenings at non-theatrical rates, which may restrict affordable access and direct community organizing.\n- Vista (C): Highest risk to credibility. Controls creative packaging (key art, trailer, title, publicity) after consultation; may create an 8-minute shorter platform version without producer approval unless it materially changes participant meaning. Limits producer-organized free screenings (25/year subject to approvals) and no educational pricing provided. Vista’s worldwide exclusivity for many rights curtails the producer’s ability to control community and educational distribution.\n\n2) Near-term cash (Objective #2)\n- Vista offers the largest headline cash and the only single-deal solution to Sept 30 in the likely-timing scenario. But timing is an expectation and editorial/access compromises are substantial.\n- Northlight offers more immediate cash than Harbor (275k vs 250k) on signing; still leaves a six-figure gap.\n- Harbor’s $250k is firm and payable quickly if we sign by Aug 15; it is competitive, but insufficient alone.\n\nWhy headline dollars can be misleading\n- Vista’s $1.2M looks dominant but trades away long-term rights, editorial control, community access, and education—contrary to Objective #1 and #4. Also, Vista offers no backend share.\n- Northlight’s $550k MG is attractive, but P&A recoupable + capped expenses and distributor fees will reduce net and their control over community screenings will limit grassroots reach.\n- Harbor’s smaller advance leaves upside (SVOD, AVOD, TV deals, international) available to the producer, preserving multiple monetization pathways and credibility, which supports Objectives #3–#6 in aggregate.\n\n3) Rights retained and long-term economics (Objectives #3, #4, #6)\n- Harbor retains SVOD/AVOD/TV/educational/international/Canada — largest remaining optionality to monetize later. This preserves long-term economics without speculative dependence on any single platform.\n- Northlight takes all US/Canada media for 12 years (broad) but offers backend participation; producers will have to rely on Northlight’s recoupment accounting and P&A spend. Community access will be mediated by Northlight’s non-theatrical rates.\n- Vista takes worldwide rights (many categories) for 15 years with no backend — immediate money at the cost of long-term receipts and control.\n\n4) Editorial and marketing control (Objective #5)\n- Harbor: best protections (mutual approval and prohibition on editorial changes without producer consent).\n- Northlight: limited consultation and ability to request edits up to 3 minutes without approval—this is a practical vulnerability.\n- Vista: significant control over key art, trailer, and permissible edits (8 minutes) with limited approval; unacceptable given director sensitivity.\n\n5) Community and educational access (Objective #4)\n- Harbor explicitly reserves free community screenings (up to 100 attendees) — strongest community access.\n- Northlight routes community screenings through their rates — reduces producer flexibility and likely increases cost to communities.\n- Vista severely restricts community screenings (25/year and approval required) and offers no stated educational pricing.\n\n6) Term, territory, and execution risk\n- Harbor: 7-year US term limited to theatrical/TVOD; lower risk for long-term rights erosion; allows pursuing public-television and educational deals immediately.\n- Northlight: 12-year US/Canada all-media — longer lockup and higher execution risk if P&A or release strategy is misaligned.\n- Vista: 15-year worldwide — long lockup that prevents other deals and risks over-reliance on platform placement.\n\nWaterfall and ambiguous language to flag\n- Harbor’s waterfall language appears straightforward but we must confirm the precise ordering of recoupment (advance, expenses, P&A) and definition of “gross receipts” and allowable recoupable deductions.\n- Northlight’s treatment of P&A as recoupable (but P&A also guaranteed $350k) and the $175k expense cap interaction need precise wording review.\n- Vista contains broad sublicensing and editorial control/cut permissions that require careful clause review.\n\nSection 4 — Negotiation plan (five highest-priority changes to request from Harbor, in order)\nGoal: preserve credibility/relationships while securing sufficient near-term liquidity and protecting future optionality.\n\n1) Increase the immediate advance to cover Sept 30 obligations (highest priority)\n- Requested term: Raise the advance from $250,000 to $520,000, payable within 10 business days of signing. (Reason: producer needs net ≥ $460,000 after agent commission; 10% commission requires gross ≈ $511,111; ask round figure $520k.)\n- Business rationale: This secures immediate obligations, avoids disruptive lender actions or rushed concessions, and enables a confident rollout with the director and community; it is a share-of-risk request given Harbor’s planned theatrical P&A and alignment with marketing.\n- Realistic fallback: $350,000 advance now, plus $100,000 guaranteed on delivery acceptance (or within 30 days of public theatrical opening). If Harbor refuses, request a cash bridge co-funded by Harbor (e.g., Harbor-funded short-term loan/reimbursement) for $150k.\n\n2) Preserve and expand community and educational rights\n- Requested term: Explicit contractual reservation of unlimited producer-organized community screenings at affordable/educational rates (not limited to 100 attendees), plus explicit right to license educational rights to third-party educational distributor at agreed terms (or right of first refusal to Harbor, short window).\n- Business rationale: Protects credibility and access (Objective #1 & #4) and allows immediate educational revenue offers to be accepted.\n- Realistic fallback: Increase free community screening cap to 250 attendees and a guaranteed right to license educational rights if Harbor declines direct assignment — or require Harbor to offer reduced non-theatrical rates for community partners.\n\n3) Shorten/clarify Harbor’s SVOD/AVOD first-negotiation period and preserve timetable\n- Requested term: Reduce 30-day first-negotiation right to 14 calendar days, require Harbor to engage in good-faith written negotiations with defined timelines, and provide explicit language that theatrical and TVOD release schedules will not be paused or delayed during negotiation.\n- Business rationale: Keeps SVOD/AVOD as a near-term monetization option while avoiding indefinite hold-ups that could block public-television or other buyers.\n- Realistic fallback: Keep 30 days but require Harbor to submit a written offer within 14 days and allow producer to market to SVOD/AVOD if no written offer is made within 30 days.\n\n4) Contractual protections against editorial changes and participant harm\n- Requested term: Insert an explicit clause: “No edits, cuts, or versions that materially change participant meaning or assign responsibility for causes of coastal loss may be made or publicly distributed without producer and director written approval.” Preserve right to withhold approval.\n- Business rationale: Protects film credibility and relationships with participants, addresses the director’s explicit opposition, reduces reputational/legal risk.\n- Realistic fallback: Maintain Harbor’s existing “No editorial changes without producer approval” language but add dispute resolution and a requirement for a transparent editorial-change log.\n\n5) Confirm P&A/expense accounting and payment triggers\n- Requested term: Detailed definitions for “recoupable expenses,” explicit caps, audit rights, and a schedule that P&A spend committed by Harbor is non-recourse to the producer for cash flow (i.e., Harbor-funded and recouped only from film receipts and not from additional producer cash obligations). Also require reporting cadence.\n- Business rationale: Protects long-term economics and prevents surprise recoupment claims; enables producer to evaluate the real backend.\n- Realistic fallback: Accept Harbor’s stated $300k guaranteed P&A and $100k recoupable expense cap but secure quarterly accounting and audit rights.\n\nSection 5 — Decision conditions and open questions (must be confirmed before signing; counsel issues)\nMust be confirmed before signing\n- Confirm Harbor can and will sign and deliver the $250k advance within the stated timeline (signable by Aug 15; payment within 10 business days). Require written commitment of exact payment date in the term sheet.\n- Get written commitment (and schedule) for any negotiated increased advance or cash bridge. If Harbor agrees to an increased advance, ensure the payment schedule and agent commission treatment are explicit.\n- Counsel must confirm: precise waterfall language, definitions of “gross receipts,” recoupable expense categories, and ordering of recoupment (advance first, then expenses/P&A).\n- Confirm that producer expressly retains educational, Canadian, and non-US international rights under the final Harbor deal (as stated) — include precise reservation clauses.\n- Obtain explicit contractual language preserving producer approval over all editorial changes and marketing materials and the community-screening rights described above.\n\nAmbiguities for counsel to resolve\n- Harbor’s 30-day first-negotiation clause for US SVOD/AVOD: what happens to release timing during negotiation? (Ambiguous — require language specifying theatrical/TVOD rollout unaffected.)\n- Waterfall ambiguities: confirm whether P&A recoupment is subordinated to advance recoupment or treated in parallel; confirm exact deduction order and allowable offsets and collection-account fees.\n- Northlight: clarify the “three-minute aggregate edits” process and whether small edits that change tone are permitted; confirm community-screening rate mechanics.\n- Vista: clarify what constitutes a “material change” to participant meaning (this is a vague standard that could be litigated).\n\nSection 6 — Concise final recommendation (for reading aloud)\nRecommendation for the producers’ meeting:\n- Pursue Harbor (Offer B) as our preferred partner because it best protects credibility and community relationships while preserving the rights we need to monetize later. Immediately enter negotiations with Harbor to secure a materially larger advance (target $520k gross, realistic fallback $350k) and contractually lock protections for editorial approval, expanded community/educational access, a shortened SVOD negotiation window, and clarified P&A/expense accounting. Simultaneously, prepare fallback conversations with Northlight (Offer A) and pursue lender-extension and immediate outreach to public-television and educational buyers to close any remaining Sept 30 cash gap. Do not accept Vista (Offer C) unless the director and community agree in writing to the editorial and access tradeoffs; its immediate cash is attractive but would sacrifice our top priority — the film’s credibility and community relationships.\n\nSeparate facts vs. judgments/assumptions\n- Facts: All figures, payment schedules, rights/territory lists, repayment obligations, sales-agent commission, and the director’s opposition to edits are taken only from the provided facts.\n- Judgments/assumptions: Likely timings for payments where the offer gives an expectation (Vista’s 15 business days), feasibility of increasing Harbor’s advance, and likely community/public-TV timelines are judgments. We treat expressions of interest (public TV, educational, Canada) as nonbinding and not committed funding.\n\nNext steps (operational)\n1. Instruct counsel to prepare a negotiation letter to Harbor today with the five requested changes and a deadline for response (48–72 hours).\n2. Simultaneously request a formal written commitment from Harbor for signing/payment timing if they will meet the immediate needs.\n3. Ask production-side lenders to negotiate a conditional 60-day extension up to $150k now as a backup (do not rely on it).\n4. Begin outreach to public-television, the educational distributor, and the Canadian contact to determine realistic timelines and whether they can deliver funds before Sept 30 (collect hard offers if possible).\n5. Prepare a contingency plan to reopen Northlight negotiations if Harbor will not concede on cash or protections.\n\nI will be available to draft the negotiation letter, run quick math scenarios for each revised advance level, and assist with counsel’s redlines on waterfall/accounting language.",
  "cost": 0.013487,
  "finishReason": "stop"
}

reference-to-text

Wetland Trail Camera Survey Report$0.0147~1m 15s
Field observation report — camera-trap image (single frame)
Note: the following is strictly limited to what is visible in the provided image. Direct observations are separated from inferences. Each statement is followed by the specific visual evidence from the image that supports it.

A. Summary (short)
- Direct observation: Two semi‑aquatic mustelid-like mammals are visible at the water’s edge beside a circular concrete culvert; one animal is carrying a bright red crustacean in its mouth. (Visual evidence: two distinct mammalian bodies present — one left-of-center in shallow water, one at the mouth of a round concrete pipe right-of-center; bright red multi‑lobed object with two obvious claws protrudes from the mouth of the animal at the pipe entrance.)

B. Direct observations (what is plainly visible)
1. Number of animals
- Observation: Exactly two animals are visible.
- Visual evidence: Two separate, non-overlapping mammalian bodies are present: one in the shallow water (left-of-center) and a second occupying the opening of a circular concrete culvert (right-of-center).

2. Probable higher-level identification (family/functional group)
- Observation: The animals are otter-like (semi‑aquatic mustelids).
- Visual evidence: Each animal shows an elongated, low-slung streamlined body; dense, wet-looking brown fur with lighter facial markings; short rounded ears; a whiskered muzzle; and a posture consistent with wading/shore use (one is in shallow water, one at water’s edge in a culvert opening).

3. Species-level ID confidence
- Observation: Species-level identification is not definitive from this image alone.
- Visual evidence: The image shows otter-typical morphology (see above) but lacks clear, species‑diagnostic details (e.g., close-up of forepaw claw length or clear tail shape) and there is no location metadata in the frame to constrain possible species.

4. Age-class (directly visible traits)
- Observation: Both individuals appear to have adult or subadult morphology (not obviously neonate/very young).
- Visual evidence: Both animals display fully developed, dense fur and adult-like body proportions (elongated torso, proportionate head) rather than downy coat or distinctly oversized head/eyes typical of very young juveniles.

5. Sex determination
- Observation: Sex cannot be determined from the image.
- Visual evidence: No external sexually dimorphic characters or genital anatomy are visible in the frame; animals’ ventral/anal regions are not clearly shown.

6. Individual animal descriptions (location, posture, movement, apparent behavior)
- Animal A (left-of-center; hereafter “Left animal”)
  - Location: Standing/wading in shallow water at the shoreline, left-of-center in the frame.
  - Visual evidence: Body positioned with ventral surface near waterline and lower limbs submerged; emergent vegetation is visible behind it.
  - Posture: Body elongated, head and neck raised and turned toward the right animal.
  - Visual evidence: Head oriented to right-of-center, eyes/face directed at the other animal; back and flanks show wet, slicked fur.
  - Movement: Water around the left animal shows small ripples, and the animal’s forelimb appears to be bearing weight at the waterline — consistent with standing/wading and possible slow forward motion.
  - Visual evidence: Concentric ripples and disturbed water surface immediately adjacent to the left animal’s legs.
  - Apparent behavior: Visually attentive to the right animal (head/eyes directed toward it); no visible prey in or around the left animal’s mouth.
  - Visual evidence: Mouth appears closed; no extraneous object in the left animal’s oral area.

- Animal B (right-of-center; hereafter “Right animal”)
  - Location: At the entrance of a circular concrete culvert embedded in the bank (right-of-center).
  - Visual evidence: Animal is positioned with part of its body inside the dark opening of the culvert and its forefeet on the muddy bank immediately outside the pipe.
  - Posture: Forelegs on the muddy bank, body posteriorly within culvert; head raised and turned slightly toward left.
  - Visual evidence: Forelimbs and chest are on the bank, back/abdomen recede into the dark interior of the culvert.
  - Movement: Appears stationary in this frame (no strong motion blur); stance suggests a paused posture at the pipe threshold.
  - Visual evidence: Clear, sharp capture of the animal with no streaking or blur; legs set on substrate.
  - Apparent behavior: Holding a red crustacean-like object in its mouth (prey capture/handling behavior).
  - Visual evidence: Bright red appendaged object protruding from the mouth, with two claw-like structures visible; the animal’s mouth is open/occupied and its head is elevated, consistent with carrying or presenting food.

7. Visible prey / food items and other potential food evidence
- Observation: A red crustacean (crab or crayfish) is visible in the mouth of the right animal.
- Visual evidence: Bright red body and paired claw-like appendages are clearly visible protruding from the right animal’s mouth at the culvert entrance.
- Observation: Scattered shell fragments (white/tan) are present on the mud in the foreground.
- Visual evidence: Numerous broken shells and shell fragments of varying sizes are visible on the muddy bank in the lower right/foreground of the image.

8. Habitat and infrastructure features (directly visible)
- Observation: Shallow water body with muddy shoreline and emergent marsh vegetation; man-made culvert/pipe opening embedded in the bank.
- Visual evidence: Standing water and mud at the foreground, tall grassy/emergent plants (sedge/reed-like stems) in the mid/background; a circular concrete pipe with a dark interior opening is embedded in the bank at right-of-center.

9. Tracks/field signs visible in the frame
- Observation: Multiple shallow depressions and rounded impressions are visible in the mud in the foreground.
- Visual evidence: Foreground mud shows numerous small, roughly oval to circular depressions and disturbed patches consistent with recent activity in the substrate (series of depressions visible center-lower area).

C. Inferences (interpretations based on the direct observations above; not proven by a single image)
(Each inference is labeled with supporting visual evidence and confidence level.)

1. Foraging activity
- Inference: The right animal is engaged in foraging/has just captured prey.
- Confidence: High.
- Visual evidence: The right animal is holding a bright red crustacean-like organism in its mouth (see B.6 Right animal — red appendaged object), which is direct evidence of prey capture/handling.

2. Possible den/refuge use of culvert
- Inference: The culvert may be used as a refuge or resting site by the animals (i.e., den/hol t use is plausible).
- Confidence: Low–moderate (plausible but not confirmed).
- Visual evidence: One animal is positioned with its posterior inside the culvert and forefeet on the threshold, suggesting the animal is entering/leaving or using the culvert’s interior space (B.6 Right animal). However, a single frame does not prove habitual den use.

3. Social interaction / food-related behavior
- Inference: The two animals may be socially interacting around the prey item (e.g., one animal showing food, possible food-sharing or begging behavior).
- Confidence: Low.
- Visual evidence: The left animal is looking toward the right animal that is holding prey (B.6 Left animal head oriented to right; B.6 Right animal holding prey). Proximity and orientation are consistent with interaction, but the single frame cannot confirm whether contact, sharing, or aggressive behavior occurred.

4. Movement / local travel
- Inference: The animals have recently moved through the mud/water in this immediate area.
- Confidence: Moderate.
- Visual evidence: Disturbed water ripples around the left animal (B.6 Left animal) and multiple shallow depressions/disturbed substrate in the foreground (B.9) indicate recent physical activity on the bank and in the water. These signs are consistent with local movement, but the track shapes are not clearly diagnostic of species.

5. Diet composition inference (local prey availability)
- Inference: Diet in this site likely includes crustaceans and potentially bivalves/snails (local available prey items visible).
- Confidence: Moderate for crustacean (direct), low for bivalves/snails.
- Visual evidence: Direct: red crustacean in mouth of right animal (B.7). Indirect: scattered shell fragments on bank (B.7) could indicate consumption of shelled invertebrates in the area, but fragments do not prove these animals produced them.

D. Image-quality limitations (items that restrict interpretation)
- Interior of culvert in deep shadow: prevents observation of the animal’s posterior or any material deeper inside the pipe. (Visual evidence: culvert interior is dark black with no visible detail.)
- Background atmospheric haze/fog: reduces ability to resolve distant habitat elements. (Visual evidence: distant emergent vegetation and treeline are soft/faint and low-contrast.)
- Species-level diagnostic features not clearly resolved: claws on forefeet, tail cross-section, and fine foot morphology are not visible at required resolution to separate closely similar otter species. (Visual evidence: forefeet are submerged or partially obscured; tail detail is underwater/behind the body.)
- Single-frame limitation: no temporal sequence to confirm approach, sharing, aggression, or den entry/exit. (Visual evidence: frame shows only one moment — a paused scene — so dynamics are unknown.)

E. Plausible alternative interpretations (with supporting visual evidence)
1. Prey taxonomic alternative
- Possibility: The red prey could be a small crab rather than a freshwater crayfish.
- Visual evidence: The object is red and shows claw-like appendages; both crabs and crayfish can appear similar at a glance in color and claw morphology in a single frame.

2. Species-level alternative
- Possibility: These animals are otters of an unspecified species or another semi‑aquatic mustelid.
- Visual evidence: While the animals show otter-typical morphology (elongated body, whiskered muzzle), specific species diagnostic characters (foot/claw length, precise tail morphology) are not visible; therefore, multiple otter species remain possible.

3. Track/print origin alternative
- Possibility: The shallow depressions in the mud could be from multiple taxa (otter paws, other mammals, wading birds, or disturbance from waves) rather than diagnostic otter prints.
- Visual evidence: Depressions are shallow and rounded but lack clear toe or pad impressions in the visible resolution, so origin cannot be uniquely assigned.

4. Culvert function alternative
- Possibility: The culvert may be acting only as a transient shelter or travel conduit rather than an established den.
- Visual evidence: The culvert is man‑made concrete and the animal is present at its threshold, which is consistent with either temporary use or regular occupation; a single frame does not distinguish these.

F. Recommendations (limited and image‑based)
- Acquire and review adjacent frames (previous/subsequent images or video) to determine sequence (approach, capture, sharing, entry/exit) and to better assess den use and social behavior (visual evidence: current single frame shows a possible interaction but cannot confirm temporal behavior).
- If possible, obtain higher‑resolution or closer-angle images of the forepaws, tail, and claws to assist species-level identification (visual evidence: those diagnostic areas are not resolved in this frame).
- Inspect the culvert interior physically (if safe and permitted) for signs of repeated use (e.g., fur, bedding material, repeated scats) to confirm den use — the image shows an animal partially within the culvert, which makes it a candidate for further checking.

G. Final concise statement of certainty
- High certainty: Two otter-like mammals are present and one is carrying a red crustacean-like prey item at the mouth of a concrete culvert on a muddy wetland shoreline. (Visual evidence: two distinct otter‑morph bodies; bright red clawed object in mouth of the right animal; culvert and wetland features visible.)
- Moderate-to-low certainty: Species-level assignment, evidence of den/hol t use, and social food‑sharing behavior — all are plausible from the frame but not confirmed without additional frames, clearer diagnostic details, or site context. (Visual evidence: general otter morphology present but lacking species-diagnostic detail; one animal inside culvert; left animal facing the right animal that holds prey.)

If you would like, I can mark and crop areas of the image to show the specific visual evidence referenced (e.g., the prey item, culvert entrance, and muddy depressions) or produce a short checklist for future camera placements to capture diagnostic features (paws, tail profile, multiple successive frames).
Finish reason: stop
Try in Playground
import { createClient } from '@runware/sdk'

const client = await createClient({ apiKey: process.env.RUNWARE_API_KEY })
await client.connect()

const [result] = await client.run({
  model: 'openai:gpt@5-mini',
  settings: {
    thinkingLevel: 'high'
  },
  inputs: {
    images: [
      'https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/70ddbbe2-3e6a-4288-bd5f-267918259652.jpg'
    ]
  },
  messages: [
    {
      role: 'user',
      content: 'Act as a wildlife biologist reviewing this camera-trap image for a wetland monitoring program. Produce a detailed field observation report grounded strictly in visible details from the image. Include: probable species identification and confidence; the exact number of animals visible; defensible age-class observations; whether sex can be determined; each animal’s location, posture, movement, and apparent behavior; any visible prey or food item; evidence of travel, foraging, den use, or social interaction; habitat and infrastructure features; tracks or other field signs; image-quality limitations; and plausible alternative interpretations. For every conclusion, cite the specific visual evidence supporting it. Clearly separate direct observations from inferences, avoid unsupported certainty, and do not invent measurements, timestamps, or off-camera activity.'
    }
  ]
})
import asyncio
import os

from runware import Runware


async def main():
    async with Runware(api_key=os.environ["RUNWARE_API_KEY"]) as client:
        results = await client.run({
            "model": "openai:gpt@5-mini",
            "settings": {
                "thinkingLevel": "high"
            },
            "inputs": {
                "images": [
                    "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/70ddbbe2-3e6a-4288-bd5f-267918259652.jpg"
                ]
            },
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "Act as a wildlife biologist reviewing this camera-trap image for a wetland monitoring program. Produce a detailed field observation report grounded strictly in visible details from the image. Include: probable species identification and confidence; the exact number of animals visible; defensible age-class observations; whether sex can be determined; each animal’s location, posture, movement, and apparent behavior; any visible prey or food item; evidence of travel, foraging, den use, or social interaction; habitat and infrastructure features; tracks or other field signs; image-quality limitations; and plausible alternative interpretations. For every conclusion, cite the specific visual evidence supporting it. Clearly separate direct observations from inferences, avoid unsupported certainty, and do not invent measurements, timestamps, or off-camera activity."
                }
            ]
        })


asyncio.run(main())
curl https://api.runware.ai/v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RUNWARE_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {
      "taskType": "textInference",
      "taskUUID": "51c7a3e4-fe9f-4355-9d4a-d84cccbeb5dd",
      "model": "openai:gpt@5-mini",
      "settings": {
        "thinkingLevel": "high"
      },
      "inputs": {
        "images": [
          "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/70ddbbe2-3e6a-4288-bd5f-267918259652.jpg"
        ]
      },
      "messages": [
        {
          "role": "user",
          "content": "Act as a wildlife biologist reviewing this camera-trap image for a wetland monitoring program. Produce a detailed field observation report grounded strictly in visible details from the image. Include: probable species identification and confidence; the exact number of animals visible; defensible age-class observations; whether sex can be determined; each animal’s location, posture, movement, and apparent behavior; any visible prey or food item; evidence of travel, foraging, den use, or social interaction; habitat and infrastructure features; tracks or other field signs; image-quality limitations; and plausible alternative interpretations. For every conclusion, cite the specific visual evidence supporting it. Clearly separate direct observations from inferences, avoid unsupported certainty, and do not invent measurements, timestamps, or off-camera activity."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]'
runware run openai:gpt@5-mini \
  settings.thinkingLevel=high \
  inputs.images.0=https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/70ddbbe2-3e6a-4288-bd5f-267918259652.jpg \
  messages.0.role=user \
  messages.0.content="Act as a wildlife biologist reviewing this camera-trap image for a wetland monitoring program. Produce a detailed field observation report grounded strictly in visible details from the image. Include: probable species identification and confidence; the exact number of animals visible; defensible age-class observations; whether sex can be determined; each animal’s location, posture, movement, and apparent behavior; any visible prey or food item; evidence of travel, foraging, den use, or social interaction; habitat and infrastructure features; tracks or other field signs; image-quality limitations; and plausible alternative interpretations. For every conclusion, cite the specific visual evidence supporting it. Clearly separate direct observations from inferences, avoid unsupported certainty, and do not invent measurements, timestamps, or off-camera activity."
{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "51c7a3e4-fe9f-4355-9d4a-d84cccbeb5dd",
  "model": "openai:gpt@5-mini",
  "settings": {
    "thinkingLevel": "high"
  },
  "inputs": {
    "images": [
      "https://assets.runware.ai/assets/inputs/70ddbbe2-3e6a-4288-bd5f-267918259652.jpg"
    ]
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "Act as a wildlife biologist reviewing this camera-trap image for a wetland monitoring program. Produce a detailed field observation report grounded strictly in visible details from the image. Include: probable species identification and confidence; the exact number of animals visible; defensible age-class observations; whether sex can be determined; each animal’s location, posture, movement, and apparent behavior; any visible prey or food item; evidence of travel, foraging, den use, or social interaction; habitat and infrastructure features; tracks or other field signs; image-quality limitations; and plausible alternative interpretations. For every conclusion, cite the specific visual evidence supporting it. Clearly separate direct observations from inferences, avoid unsupported certainty, and do not invent measurements, timestamps, or off-camera activity."
    }
  ]
}
Response
{
  "taskType": "textInference",
  "taskUUID": "51c7a3e4-fe9f-4355-9d4a-d84cccbeb5dd",
  "text": "Field observation report — camera-trap image (single frame)\nNote: the following is strictly limited to what is visible in the provided image. Direct observations are separated from inferences. Each statement is followed by the specific visual evidence from the image that supports it.\n\nA. Summary (short)\n- Direct observation: Two semi‑aquatic mustelid-like mammals are visible at the water’s edge beside a circular concrete culvert; one animal is carrying a bright red crustacean in its mouth. (Visual evidence: two distinct mammalian bodies present — one left-of-center in shallow water, one at the mouth of a round concrete pipe right-of-center; bright red multi‑lobed object with two obvious claws protrudes from the mouth of the animal at the pipe entrance.)\n\nB. Direct observations (what is plainly visible)\n1. Number of animals\n- Observation: Exactly two animals are visible.\n- Visual evidence: Two separate, non-overlapping mammalian bodies are present: one in the shallow water (left-of-center) and a second occupying the opening of a circular concrete culvert (right-of-center).\n\n2. Probable higher-level identification (family/functional group)\n- Observation: The animals are otter-like (semi‑aquatic mustelids).\n- Visual evidence: Each animal shows an elongated, low-slung streamlined body; dense, wet-looking brown fur with lighter facial markings; short rounded ears; a whiskered muzzle; and a posture consistent with wading/shore use (one is in shallow water, one at water’s edge in a culvert opening).\n\n3. Species-level ID confidence\n- Observation: Species-level identification is not definitive from this image alone.\n- Visual evidence: The image shows otter-typical morphology (see above) but lacks clear, species‑diagnostic details (e.g., close-up of forepaw claw length or clear tail shape) and there is no location metadata in the frame to constrain possible species.\n\n4. Age-class (directly visible traits)\n- Observation: Both individuals appear to have adult or subadult morphology (not obviously neonate/very young).\n- Visual evidence: Both animals display fully developed, dense fur and adult-like body proportions (elongated torso, proportionate head) rather than downy coat or distinctly oversized head/eyes typical of very young juveniles.\n\n5. Sex determination\n- Observation: Sex cannot be determined from the image.\n- Visual evidence: No external sexually dimorphic characters or genital anatomy are visible in the frame; animals’ ventral/anal regions are not clearly shown.\n\n6. Individual animal descriptions (location, posture, movement, apparent behavior)\n- Animal A (left-of-center; hereafter “Left animal”)\n  - Location: Standing/wading in shallow water at the shoreline, left-of-center in the frame.\n  - Visual evidence: Body positioned with ventral surface near waterline and lower limbs submerged; emergent vegetation is visible behind it.\n  - Posture: Body elongated, head and neck raised and turned toward the right animal.\n  - Visual evidence: Head oriented to right-of-center, eyes/face directed at the other animal; back and flanks show wet, slicked fur.\n  - Movement: Water around the left animal shows small ripples, and the animal’s forelimb appears to be bearing weight at the waterline — consistent with standing/wading and possible slow forward motion.\n  - Visual evidence: Concentric ripples and disturbed water surface immediately adjacent to the left animal’s legs.\n  - Apparent behavior: Visually attentive to the right animal (head/eyes directed toward it); no visible prey in or around the left animal’s mouth.\n  - Visual evidence: Mouth appears closed; no extraneous object in the left animal’s oral area.\n\n- Animal B (right-of-center; hereafter “Right animal”)\n  - Location: At the entrance of a circular concrete culvert embedded in the bank (right-of-center).\n  - Visual evidence: Animal is positioned with part of its body inside the dark opening of the culvert and its forefeet on the muddy bank immediately outside the pipe.\n  - Posture: Forelegs on the muddy bank, body posteriorly within culvert; head raised and turned slightly toward left.\n  - Visual evidence: Forelimbs and chest are on the bank, back/abdomen recede into the dark interior of the culvert.\n  - Movement: Appears stationary in this frame (no strong motion blur); stance suggests a paused posture at the pipe threshold.\n  - Visual evidence: Clear, sharp capture of the animal with no streaking or blur; legs set on substrate.\n  - Apparent behavior: Holding a red crustacean-like object in its mouth (prey capture/handling behavior).\n  - Visual evidence: Bright red appendaged object protruding from the mouth, with two claw-like structures visible; the animal’s mouth is open/occupied and its head is elevated, consistent with carrying or presenting food.\n\n7. Visible prey / food items and other potential food evidence\n- Observation: A red crustacean (crab or crayfish) is visible in the mouth of the right animal.\n- Visual evidence: Bright red body and paired claw-like appendages are clearly visible protruding from the right animal’s mouth at the culvert entrance.\n- Observation: Scattered shell fragments (white/tan) are present on the mud in the foreground.\n- Visual evidence: Numerous broken shells and shell fragments of varying sizes are visible on the muddy bank in the lower right/foreground of the image.\n\n8. Habitat and infrastructure features (directly visible)\n- Observation: Shallow water body with muddy shoreline and emergent marsh vegetation; man-made culvert/pipe opening embedded in the bank.\n- Visual evidence: Standing water and mud at the foreground, tall grassy/emergent plants (sedge/reed-like stems) in the mid/background; a circular concrete pipe with a dark interior opening is embedded in the bank at right-of-center.\n\n9. Tracks/field signs visible in the frame\n- Observation: Multiple shallow depressions and rounded impressions are visible in the mud in the foreground.\n- Visual evidence: Foreground mud shows numerous small, roughly oval to circular depressions and disturbed patches consistent with recent activity in the substrate (series of depressions visible center-lower area).\n\nC. Inferences (interpretations based on the direct observations above; not proven by a single image)\n(Each inference is labeled with supporting visual evidence and confidence level.)\n\n1. Foraging activity\n- Inference: The right animal is engaged in foraging/has just captured prey.\n- Confidence: High.\n- Visual evidence: The right animal is holding a bright red crustacean-like organism in its mouth (see B.6 Right animal — red appendaged object), which is direct evidence of prey capture/handling.\n\n2. Possible den/refuge use of culvert\n- Inference: The culvert may be used as a refuge or resting site by the animals (i.e., den/hol t use is plausible).\n- Confidence: Low–moderate (plausible but not confirmed).\n- Visual evidence: One animal is positioned with its posterior inside the culvert and forefeet on the threshold, suggesting the animal is entering/leaving or using the culvert’s interior space (B.6 Right animal). However, a single frame does not prove habitual den use.\n\n3. Social interaction / food-related behavior\n- Inference: The two animals may be socially interacting around the prey item (e.g., one animal showing food, possible food-sharing or begging behavior).\n- Confidence: Low.\n- Visual evidence: The left animal is looking toward the right animal that is holding prey (B.6 Left animal head oriented to right; B.6 Right animal holding prey). Proximity and orientation are consistent with interaction, but the single frame cannot confirm whether contact, sharing, or aggressive behavior occurred.\n\n4. Movement / local travel\n- Inference: The animals have recently moved through the mud/water in this immediate area.\n- Confidence: Moderate.\n- Visual evidence: Disturbed water ripples around the left animal (B.6 Left animal) and multiple shallow depressions/disturbed substrate in the foreground (B.9) indicate recent physical activity on the bank and in the water. These signs are consistent with local movement, but the track shapes are not clearly diagnostic of species.\n\n5. Diet composition inference (local prey availability)\n- Inference: Diet in this site likely includes crustaceans and potentially bivalves/snails (local available prey items visible).\n- Confidence: Moderate for crustacean (direct), low for bivalves/snails.\n- Visual evidence: Direct: red crustacean in mouth of right animal (B.7). Indirect: scattered shell fragments on bank (B.7) could indicate consumption of shelled invertebrates in the area, but fragments do not prove these animals produced them.\n\nD. Image-quality limitations (items that restrict interpretation)\n- Interior of culvert in deep shadow: prevents observation of the animal’s posterior or any material deeper inside the pipe. (Visual evidence: culvert interior is dark black with no visible detail.)\n- Background atmospheric haze/fog: reduces ability to resolve distant habitat elements. (Visual evidence: distant emergent vegetation and treeline are soft/faint and low-contrast.)\n- Species-level diagnostic features not clearly resolved: claws on forefeet, tail cross-section, and fine foot morphology are not visible at required resolution to separate closely similar otter species. (Visual evidence: forefeet are submerged or partially obscured; tail detail is underwater/behind the body.)\n- Single-frame limitation: no temporal sequence to confirm approach, sharing, aggression, or den entry/exit. (Visual evidence: frame shows only one moment — a paused scene — so dynamics are unknown.)\n\nE. Plausible alternative interpretations (with supporting visual evidence)\n1. Prey taxonomic alternative\n- Possibility: The red prey could be a small crab rather than a freshwater crayfish.\n- Visual evidence: The object is red and shows claw-like appendages; both crabs and crayfish can appear similar at a glance in color and claw morphology in a single frame.\n\n2. Species-level alternative\n- Possibility: These animals are otters of an unspecified species or another semi‑aquatic mustelid.\n- Visual evidence: While the animals show otter-typical morphology (elongated body, whiskered muzzle), specific species diagnostic characters (foot/claw length, precise tail morphology) are not visible; therefore, multiple otter species remain possible.\n\n3. Track/print origin alternative\n- Possibility: The shallow depressions in the mud could be from multiple taxa (otter paws, other mammals, wading birds, or disturbance from waves) rather than diagnostic otter prints.\n- Visual evidence: Depressions are shallow and rounded but lack clear toe or pad impressions in the visible resolution, so origin cannot be uniquely assigned.\n\n4. Culvert function alternative\n- Possibility: The culvert may be acting only as a transient shelter or travel conduit rather than an established den.\n- Visual evidence: The culvert is man‑made concrete and the animal is present at its threshold, which is consistent with either temporary use or regular occupation; a single frame does not distinguish these.\n\nF. Recommendations (limited and image‑based)\n- Acquire and review adjacent frames (previous/subsequent images or video) to determine sequence (approach, capture, sharing, entry/exit) and to better assess den use and social behavior (visual evidence: current single frame shows a possible interaction but cannot confirm temporal behavior).\n- If possible, obtain higher‑resolution or closer-angle images of the forepaws, tail, and claws to assist species-level identification (visual evidence: those diagnostic areas are not resolved in this frame).\n- Inspect the culvert interior physically (if safe and permitted) for signs of repeated use (e.g., fur, bedding material, repeated scats) to confirm den use — the image shows an animal partially within the culvert, which makes it a candidate for further checking.\n\nG. Final concise statement of certainty\n- High certainty: Two otter-like mammals are present and one is carrying a red crustacean-like prey item at the mouth of a concrete culvert on a muddy wetland shoreline. (Visual evidence: two distinct otter‑morph bodies; bright red clawed object in mouth of the right animal; culvert and wetland features visible.)\n- Moderate-to-low certainty: Species-level assignment, evidence of den/hol t use, and social food‑sharing behavior — all are plausible from the frame but not confirmed without additional frames, clearer diagnostic details, or site context. (Visual evidence: general otter morphology present but lacking species-diagnostic detail; one animal inside culvert; left animal facing the right animal that holds prey.)\n\nIf you would like, I can mark and crop areas of the image to show the specific visual evidence referenced (e.g., the prey item, culvert entrance, and muddy depressions) or produce a short checklist for future camera placements to capture diagnostic features (paws, tail profile, multiple successive frames).",
  "cost": 0.014713,
  "finishReason": "stop"
}